Geosciences Journal

  • 제22권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1041-1052
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-4806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-7477(eISSN)
한국지질과학협의회 (The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of single-well push-drift-pull tests using dual tracers (SF6 and salt) for designing CO2 leakage monitoring network at the environmental impact test site in Korea

  • Kim, Hong-Hyun (Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy) ;
  • Lee, Seong-Sun (School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ha, Seung-Wook (School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kang-Kun (School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.06
  • 심사 : 2018.05.20
  • 발행 : 2018.12.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A single-well push-drift-pull tracer test using two different tracers ($SF_6$ and salt) was performed at the Environmental Impact Test (EIT) site to determine suitable locations for monitoring wells and arrange them prior to artificial $CO_2$ injection and leak tests. Local-scale estimates of hydraulic properties (linear groundwater velocity and effective porosity) were obtained at the study site by the tracer test with two tracers. The mass recovery percentage of the volatile tracer ($SF_6$) was lower than that of the non-volatile tracer (salt) and increased drift time may make degassing of $SF_6$ intensified. The $CO_2$ leakage monitoring results for both unsaturated and saturated zones suggest that the $CO_2$ monitoring points should be located near points at which a high concentration gradient is expected. Based on the estimated hydraulic properties and tracer mass recovery rates, an optimal $CO_2$ monitoring network including boreholes for monitoring the unsaturated zone was constructed at the study site.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : KEITI

참고문헌

  1. Addy, K., Kellogg, D.Q., Gold, A.J., Groffman, P.M., Ferendo, G., and Sawyer, C., 2002, In situ push-pull method to determine ground water denitrification in riparian zones. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, 1017-1024. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2002.1017
  2. Blackford, J., Stahl, H., Bull, J.M., Berges, B.J.P., Cevatoglu, M., Lichtschlag, A., Connelly, D., James, R.H., Kita, J., Long, D., Naylor, M., Shitashima, K., Smith, D., Taylor, P., Wright, I., Akhurst, M., Chen, B., Gernon, T.M., Hauton, C., Hayashi, M., Kaieda, H., Leighton, T.G., Sato, T., Sayer, M.D.J., Suzumura, M., Tait, K., Vardy, M.E., White, P.R., and Widdicombe, S., 2014, Detection and impacts of leakage from sub-seafloor deep geological carbon dioxide storage. Nature Climate Change, 4, 1011-1016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2381
  3. Cahill, A.G., Marker, P., and Jakobsen, R., 2014, Hydrogeochemical and mineralogical effects of sustained $CO_2$ contamination in a shallow sandy aquifer: a field-scale controlled release experiment. Water Resources Research, 50, 1735-1755. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014294
  4. Cappa, F. and Rutqvist, J., 2011, Impact of $CO_2$ geological sequestration on the nucleation of earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L17313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048487
  5. Clark, J.F., Hudson, G.B., and Avisar, D., 2005, Gas transport below artificial recharge ponds: Insights from dissolved noble gases and a dual gas (SF6 and 3He) tracer experiment. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 3939-3945. https://doi.org/10.1021/es049053x
  6. Dewar, M., Wei, W., McNeil, D., and Chen, B., 2013, Small-scale modelling of the physiochemical impacts of $CO_2$ leaked from sub-seabed reservoirs or pipelines within the North Sea and surrounding waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 73, 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.03.005
  7. Ha, S.W., Park, B.H., Lee, S.H., and Lee, K.K., 2017, Experimental and numerical study on gaseous $CO_2$ leakage through shallow-depth layered porous medium: implication for leakage detection monitoring. Energy Procedia, 114, 3033-3039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1431
  8. Hall, S.H., Luttrell, S.P., and Cronin, W.E., 1991, A method for estimating effective porosity and ground-water velocity. Groundwater, 29, 171-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1991.tb00506.x
  9. Harvey, O.R., Qafoku, N.P., Cantrell, K.J., Lee, G., Amonette, J.E., and Brown, C.F., 2012, Geochemical implications of gas leakage associated with geologic $CO_2$ storage - a qualitative review. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 23-36.
  10. Hebig, K.H., Zeilfelder, S., Ito, N., Machida, I., Marui, A., and Scheytt, T.J., 2015, Study of the effects of the chaser in push-pull tracer tests by using temporal moment analysis. Geothermics, 54, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.11.004
  11. Hibbs, D.E., Parkhill, K.L., and Gulliver, J.S., 1998, Sulfur hexafluoride gas tracer studies in streams. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 124, 752-760. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:8(752)
  12. Humez, P., Audigane, P., Lions, J., Chiaberge, C., and Bellenfant, G., 2011, Modeling of $CO_2$ leakage up through an abandoned well from deep saline aquifer to shallow fresh groundwaters. Transport in Porous Media, 90, 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-011-9801-2
  13. Humez, P., Lagneau, V., Lions, J., and Negrel, P., 2013, Assessing the potential consequences of $CO_2$ leakage to freshwater resources: a batch-reaction experiment towards an isotopic tracing tool. Applied Geochemistry, 30, 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.07.014
  14. Hvidevold, H.K., Alendal, G., Johannessen, T., Ali, A., Mannseth, T., and Avesen, H., 2015, Layout of CCS monitoring infrastructure with highest probability of detecting a footprint of a $CO_2$ leak in a varying marine environment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 37, 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.013
  15. Hwang, H.T., 2004, Experimental and numerical sensitivity analyses on push-drift-pull tracer tests. Master's Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, 108 p.
  16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2005, Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. http://www.ipcc.ch
  17. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2007, Climate change 2007: the physical basis, the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate, summary for policymakers. http://www.ipcc.ch
  18. Istok, J.D., 2012, Push-Pull Tests for Site Characterization. Springer, Berlin, 83 p.
  19. Jenkins, C.R., Cook, P.J., Ennis-King, J., Undershultz, J., Boreham, C., Dance, T., de Caritat, P., Etheridge, D.M., Freifeld, B.M., Hortle, A., and Kirste, D., 2012, Safe storage and effective monitoring of $CO_2$ in depleted gas fields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, E35-E41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107255108
  20. Jun, S.C., Cheon, J.Y., Yi, J.H., and Yun, S.T., 2017, Controlled release test facility to develop environmental monitoring techniques for geologically stored $CO_2$ in Korea. Energy Procedia, 114, 3040-3051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1432
  21. Kang, P.J., Kim, W.Y., and Lee, J.H., 1980, Manual of geologic map of Jincheon. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon, South Korea (in Korean).
  22. Kharaka, Y.K., Cole, D.R., Hovorka, S.D., Gunter, W.D., Knauss, K.G., and Freifeld, B.M., 2006, Gas-water-rock interactions in Frio Formation following $CO_2$ injection: implications for the storage of greenhouse gases in sedimentary basins. Geology, 34, 577-580. https://doi.org/10.1130/G22357.1
  23. Kharaka, Y.K., Thordsen, J.J., Kakouros, E., Ambats, G., Herkelrath, W.N., Beers, S.R., Birkholzer, J.T., Apps, J.A., Spycher, N.F., and Zheng, L., 2010, Changes in the chemistry of shallow groundwater related to the 2008 injection of $CO_2$ at the ZERT field site, Bozeman, Montana. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60, 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0401-1
  24. Kilgallon, R., Gilfillan, S.M.V., Edlmann, K., McDermott, C.I., Naylor, M., and Haszeldine, R.S., 2017, Experimental determination of noble gases and SF6, as tracers of $CO_2$ flow through porous sandstone. Chemical Geology, 480, 93-104.
  25. Koo, C.M., Lee, K., Kim, M., and Kim, D.O., 2005, Automated system for fast and accurate analysis of SF6 injected in the surface ocean. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 8427-8433. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050149g
  26. Leap, D.I. and Kaplan, P.G., 1988, A single-well tracing method for estimating regional advective velocity in a confined aquifer: theory and preliminary laboratory verification. Water Resources Research, 24, 993-998. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i007p00993
  27. Lee, K.K., Lee, S.H., Yun, S.T., and Jeen, S.W., 2016, Shallow groundwater system monitoring on controlled $CO_2$ release sites: a review on field experimental methods and efforts for $CO_2$ leakage detection. Geosciences Journal, 20, 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-015-0060-z
  28. Lee, S.S., Kim, H.H., Joun, W.T., and Lee, K.K., 2017, Design and construction of groundwater monitoring network at shallow-depth $CO_2$ injection and leak site, Korea. Energy Procedia, 114, 3060-3069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1434
  29. Lemieux, J.M., 2011, The potential impact of underground geological storage of carbon dioxide in deep saline aquifers on shallow groundwater resources. Hydrogeology Journal, 19, 757-778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0715-4
  30. Lessoff, S.C. and Konikow, L.F., 1997, Ambiguity in measuring matrix diffusion with single-well injection/recovery tracer tests. Groundwater, 35, 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00072.x
  31. Lions, J.G.I., May, F., Nygaard, E., Ruetters, H., Beaubien, S., Sohrabi, M., and Hatzignatiou, D.G., 2011, Potential impacts on groundwater resources of deep $CO_2$ storage: natural analogues for assessing potential chemical effects. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, San Francisco, Dec. 5-9, H32B-08.
  32. Lu, J., Cook, P.J., Hosseini, S.A., Yang, C., Romanak, K.D., Zhang, T., Freifeld, B.M., Smyth, R.C., Zeng, H., and Hovorka, S.D., 2012, Complex fluid flow revealed by monitoring $CO_2$ injection in a fluvial formation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008939
  33. Ma, J., Wang, X., Gao, R., Zhang, X., Wei, Y., Wang, Z., Ma, J., Huang, C., Liu, L., Jiang, S., and Li, L., 2013, Monitoring the safety of $CO_2$ sequestration in Jingbian Field. Energy Procedia, 37, 3469-3478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.237
  34. Myer, L.R. and Daley, T., 2011, Elements of a best practices approach to induced seismicity in geologic storage. Energy Procedia, 4, 3707-3713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.303
  35. Myers, M., Stalker, L., Pejcic, B., and Ross, A., 2013, Tracers - past, present and future applications in $CO_2$ geosequestration. Applied Geochemistry, 30, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.06.001
  36. Nicol, A., Come, R., Gerstenberger, M., and Christophersen, A., 2011, Induced seismicity and its implications for $CO_2$ storage risk. Energy Procedia, 4, 3699-3706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.302
  37. Payne, F.C., Quinnan, J.A., and Potter, S.T., 2008, Remediation Hydraulics. CRC Press, New York, 432 p.
  38. Peter, A., Hornbruch, G., and Dahmke, A., 2011, $CO_2$ leakage test in a shallow aquifer for investigating the geochemical impact of $CO_2$ on groundwater and for developing monitoring methods and concepts. Energy Procedia, 4, 4148-4153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.359
  39. Peter, A., Lamert, H., Beyer, M., Hornbruch, G., Heinrich, B., Schulz, A., Geistlinger, H., Schreiber, B., Dietrich, P., and Werban, U., 2012, Investigation of the geochemical impact of $CO_2$ on shallow groundwater: design and implementation of a $CO_2$ injection test in Northeast Germany. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67, 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1700-5
  40. Rinaldi, A.P., Rutqvist, J., and Cappa, F., 2014, Geomechanical effects on $CO_2$ leakage through fault zones during large-scale underground injection. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 20, 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.001
  41. Salhani, N. and Stengel, E., 2001, A comparative study of the gas exchange potential between three wetland species using sulfur hexafluoride as a tracer. Ecological Engineering, 18, 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00175-0
  42. Smith, M., Campbell, D., Mackay, E., and Polson, D., 2012, $CO_2$ aquifer storage site evaluation and monitoring: Understanding the challenges of $CO_2$ storage: results of the CASSEM project. Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage, Edinburgh. Available from http://www.sccs.org.uk/expertise/reports
  43. Trautz, R.C., Pugh, J.D., Varadharajan, C., Zheng, L., Bianchi, M., Nico, P.S., Spycher, N.F., Newell, D.L., Esposito, R.A., and Wu, Y., 2013, Effect of dissolved $CO_2$ on a shallow groundwater system: a controlled release field experiment. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 298-305. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301280t
  44. Zheng, L., Apps, J.A., Zhang, Y., Xu, T., and Birkholzer, J.T., 2009, Reactive transport simulations to study groundwater quality changes in response to $CO_2$ leakage from deep geological storage. Energy Procedia, 1, 1887-1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.246
  45. Zhou, R., Huang, L., and Rutledge, J., 2010, Microseismic event location for monitoring $CO_2$ injection using double-difference tomography. The Leading Edge, 29, 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3304826

피인용 문헌

  1. Changes in geochemical and carbon isotopic compositions during reactions of CO2-saturated groundwater with aquifer materials vol.95, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.102961
  2. Changes in Geochemical Composition of Groundwater Due to CO2 Leakage in Various Geological Media vol.12, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092597
  3. Natural 222Rn as a tracer of mixing and volatilization in a shallow aquifer during a CO2 injection experiment vol.34, pp.26, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13953
  4. An adaptive zone-based refinement method for characterizing a highly complex aquifer system model vol.603, pp.no.pc, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126961