DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Poor Prognostic Implication of ASXL1 Mutations in Korean Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

  • Kim, Hyun-Young (Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Ki-O (Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Silvia (Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Jun Ho (Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Chul Won (Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Hee (Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jin (Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.08.28
  • Accepted : 2018.05.21
  • Published : 2018.11.01

Abstract

Background: Molecular genetic abnormalities are observed in over 90% of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) cases. Recently, several studies have demonstrated the negative prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations in CMML patients. We evaluated the prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations and compared five CMML prognostic models in Korean patients with CMML. Methods: We analyzed data from 36 of 57 patients diagnosed as having CMML from January 2000 to March 2016. ASXL1 mutation analysis was performed by direct sequencing, and the clinical and laboratory features of patients were compared according to ASXL1 mutation status. Results: ASXL1 mutations were detected in 18 patients (50%). There were no significant differences between the clinical and laboratory characteristics of ASXL1-mutated ($ASXL1^+$) CMML and ASXL1-nonmutated ($ASXL1^-$) CMML patients (all P >0.05). During the median follow-up of 14 months (range, 0-111 months), the overall survival (OS) of $ASXL1^+$ CMML patients was significantly inferior to that of $ASXL1^-$ CMML patients with a median survival of 11 months and 19 months, respectively (log-rank P =0.049). An evaluation of OS according to the prognostic models demonstrated inferior survival in patients with a higher risk category according to the Mayo molecular model (log-rank P =0.001); the other scoring systems did not demonstrate a significant association with survival. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ASXL1 mutations, occurring in half of the Korean CMML patients examined, were associated with inferior survival. ASXL1 mutation status needs to be determined for risk stratification in CMML.

Keywords

References

  1. Patnaik MM and Tefferi A. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2016;91:631-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24396
  2. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016;127:2391-405. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544
  3. Such E, Cervera J, Costa D, Sole F, Vallespi T, Luno E, et al. Cytogenetic risk stratification in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Haematologica 2011;96:375-83. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2010.030957
  4. Wassie EA, Itzykson R, Lasho TL, Kosmider O, Finke CM, Hanson CA, et al. Molecular and prognostic correlates of cytogenetic abnormalities in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a Mayo Clinic-French Consortium Study. Am J Hematol 2014;89:1111-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.23846
  5. Patnaik MM and Tefferi A. Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood Cancer J 2016;6:e393. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2016.5
  6. Patnaik MM, Lasho TL, Vijayvargiya P, Finke CM, Hanson CA, Ketterling RP, et al. Prognostic interaction between ASXL1 and TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood Cancer J 2016;6:e385. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.113
  7. Gelsi-Boyer V, Trouplin V, Roquain J, Adelaide J, Carbuccia N, Esterni B, et al. ASXL1 mutation is associated with poor prognosis and acute transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2010;151:365-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08381.x
  8. Itzykson R, Kosmider O, Renneville A, Gelsi-Boyer V, Meggendorfer M, Morabito M, et al. Prognostic score including gene mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2428-36. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.47.3314
  9. Patnaik MM, Itzykson R, Lasho TL, Kosmider O, Finke CM, Hanson CA, et al. ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations and their prognostic contribution in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a two-center study of 466 patients. Leukemia 2014;28:2206-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2014.125
  10. Onida F, Kantarjian HM, Smith TL, Ball G, Keating MJ, Estey EH, et al. Prognostic factors and scoring systems in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a retrospective analysis of 213 patients. Blood 2002;99:840-9. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V99.3.840
  11. Such E, Germing U, Malcovati L, Cervera J, Kuendgen A, Della Porta MG, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic scoring system for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 2013;121: 3005-15. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-08-452938
  12. Patnaik MM, Padron E, LaBorde RR, Lasho TL, Finke CM, Hanson CA, et al. Mayo prognostic model for WHO-defined chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: ASXL1 and spliceosome component mutations and outcomes. Leukemia 2013;27:1504-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.88
  13. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 2009;114:937-51. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262
  14. Tang G, Zhang L, Fu B, Hu J, Lu X, Hu S, et al. Cytogenetic risk stratification of 417 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia from a single institution. Am J Hematol 2014;89:813-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.23751
  15. Patnaik MM, Wassie EA, Padron E, Onida F, Itzykson R, Lasho TL, et al. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in younger patients: molecular and cytogenetic predictors of survival and treatment outcome. Blood Cancer J 2015;5:e270. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2014.90
  16. Calvo X, Nomdedeu M, Santacruz R, Martinez N, Costa D, Pereira A, et al. Comparison of three prognostic scoring systems in a series of 146 cases of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML): MD Anderson prognostic score (MDAPS), CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) and Mayo prognostic model. A detailed review of prognostic factors in CMML. Leuk Res 2015;39:1146-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2015.05.017
  17. Patnaik MM, Wassie EA, Lasho TL, Hanson CA, Ketterling R, Tefferi A. Blast transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: risk factors, genetic features, survival, and treatment outcome. Am J Hematol 2015; 90:411-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.23962

Cited by

  1. Clonal Hematopoiesis with Oncogenic Potential (CHOP): Separation from CHIP and Roads to AML vol.20, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030789