DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중기 나이관련황반변성 환자에서 항산화영양제 복용 후 장기 관찰 결과

Long-term Results of Taking Anti-oxidant Nutritional Supplement in Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration

  • 방슬기 (경희대학교 의과대학 경희대학교병원 안과학교실) ;
  • 김응석 (경희대학교 의과대학 경희대학교병원 안과학교실) ;
  • 김종우 (건양대학교 의과대학 김안과병원 안과학교실) ;
  • 신재필 (경북대학교 의과대학 안과학교실) ;
  • 이지은 (부산대학교 의과대학 안과학교실) ;
  • 유형곤 (서울대학교 의과대학 안과학교실) ;
  • 허걸 (푸른세상안과의원) ;
  • 유승영 (경희대학교 의과대학 경희대학교병원 안과학교실)
  • Bang, Seul Ki (Department of Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Eung Suk (Department of Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jong Woo (Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Jae Pil (Department of Ophthalmology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Ji Eun (Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yu, Hyeong Gon (Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Huh, Kuhl (Blue Eye Center) ;
  • Yu, Seung-Young (Department of Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.21
  • 심사 : 2018.11.23
  • 발행 : 2018.12.15

초록

목적: 중기 나이관련황반변성 환자에서 항산화영양제 복용 후 3년간의 경과 변화를 전향적으로 분석하였다. 대상과 방법: 전향적, 다기관 연구로서 중기 나이관련황반변성으로 진단받은 55명 79안을 대상으로 루테인과 지아잔틴을 복용하게 한 후 전향적으로 관찰하였다. 첫 방문 후 12개월 간격으로 총 36개월간 대비감도검사를 시행하였고, 교정시력 및 중심와 망막두께, 드루젠 부피를 측정하였다. 중심와 망막두께 및 드루젠 부피는 스펙트럼영역 빛간섭단층촬영기를 이용해 측정하였다. 결과: 대상 환자의 임상 양상을 분석한 결과, 환자들의 평균 연령은 $72.46{\pm}7.16$세였다. 대비감도 검사 결과는 종료 시점에서 최초 시점과 비교하여 호전된 양상을 보였고, 특히 3, 6 cycles per degree에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 최초 환자들의 교정시력은 $0.13{\pm}0.14logMAR$로, 이후 36개월간 유의한 차이가 없었다. 관찰 기간 동안 중심와 망막두께, 드루젠 부피 또한 통계적으로 의미 있는 변화가 없었다. 결론: 중기 나이관련황반변성 환자에서 항산화영양제 복용 후 장기간의 추적관찰 기간 동안 대비감도가 호전되어 시기능 향상에 도움이 되었으며, 교정시력과 중심와 망막두께, 드루젠 부피에는 의미 있는 변화는 없었다. 따라서 항산화영양제의 섭취를 통해 황반 변성의 진행을 감소시키고 시기능의 질적 향상을 기대해 볼 수 있다.

Purpose: We prospectively investigated clinical changes and long-term outcomes after administration of the drugs recommended by the Age-Related Eye Disease Study-2 to patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: This prospective multicenter study enrolled 79 eyes of 55 patients taking lutein and zeaxanthin. The primary endpoint was contrast sensitivity; this was checked every 12 months for a total of 36 months after treatment commenced. The secondary endpoints were visual acuity, central macular thickness, and drusen volume; the latter two parameters were assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Results: The mean patient age was $72.46{\pm}7.16years$. Contrast sensitivity gradually improved at both three and six cycles per degree. The corrected visual acuity was $0.13{\pm}0.14logMAR$ and did not change significantly over the 36 months. Neither the central macular thickness nor drusen volume changed significantly. Conclusions: Contrast sensitivity markedly improved after treatment, improving vision and patient satisfaction. Visual acuity, central retinal thickness, and drusen volume did not deteriorate. Therefore, progression of AMD and visual function deterioration were halted.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Vingerling JR, Dielemans I, Hofman A, et al. The prevalence of age-related maculopathy in the Rotterdam study. Ophthalmology 1995;102:205-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(95)31034-2
  2. Klein R, Chou CF, Klein BE, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the US population. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:75-80. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.318
  3. Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The beaver dam eye study. Ophthalmology 1992;99:933-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31871-8
  4. Krishnaiah S, Das TP, Kovai V, Rao GN. Associated factors for Age-related maculopathy in the adult population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1146-50. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.159723
  5. Miyazaki M, Nakamura H, Kubo M, et al. Risk factors for age related maculopathy in a Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:469-72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.4.469
  6. Song SJ, Youm DJ, Chang Y, Yu HG. Age-related macular degeneration in a screened South Korean population: prevalence, risk factors, and subtypes. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16:304-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286580902999413
  7. Park SJ, Lee JH, Woo SJ, et al. Epidemiologic Survey Committee of the Korean Ophthalmologic Society; Age-related macular degeneration: prevalence and risk factors from Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008 through 2011. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1756-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.022
  8. Dimitrov PN, Mukesh BN, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Five-year incidence of bilateral cause-specific visual impairment in the Melbourne visual impairment project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5075-81. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-0457
  9. Domalpally A, Danis R, Agron E, et al. Evaluation of geographic atrophy from color photographs and fundus autofluorescence images: age-related eye disease study 2 report number 11. Ophthalmology 2016;123:2401-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.025
  10. Ding X, Patel M, Chan CC. Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res 2009;28:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.10.001
  11. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1417-36. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.10.1417
  12. Faria BM, Duman F, Zheng CX, et al. Evaluating contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration using a novel computer-based test, the SPAETH/RICHMAN contrast sensitivity test. Retina 2015;35:1465-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000474
  13. Maynard ML, Zele AJ, Feigl B. Mesopic Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and MP-1 microperimetry in healthy ageing and age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol 2016;94:e772-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13112
  14. Richman J, Spaeth GL, Wirostko B. Contrast sensitivity basics and a critique of currently available tests. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:1100-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.001
  15. Hammond BR, Fletcher LM, Roos F, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effects of lutein and zeaxanthin on photostress recovery, glare disability, and chromatic contrast. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:8583-9. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15573
  16. Nolan JM, Power R, Stringham J, et al. Enrichment of macular pigment enhances contrast sensitivity in subjects free of retinal disease: central retinal enrichment supplementation trials - report 1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57:3429-39. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19520
  17. Kvansakul J, Rodriguez-Carmona M, Edgar DF, et al. Supplementation with the carotenoids lutein or zeaxanthin improves human visual performance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006;26:362-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00387.x
  18. Loughman J, Nolan JM, Howard AN, et al. The impact of macular pigment augmentation on visual performance using different carotenoid formulations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:7871-80. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10690
  19. Nolan JM, Loughman J, Akkali MC, et al. The impact of macular pigment augmentation on visual performance in normal subjects: COMPASS. Vision Res 2011;51:459-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.016
  20. Olmedilla B, Granado F, Blanco I, Vaquero M. Lutein, but not alpha-tocopherol, supplementation improves visual function in patients with age-related cataracts: a 2-y double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Nutrition 2003;19:21-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00861-4
  21. Ma L, Lin XM, Zou ZY, et al. A 12-week lutein supplementation improves visual function in Chinese people with long-term computer display light exposure. Br J Nutr 2009;102:186-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508163000
  22. Bartlett HE, Eperjesi F. Effect of lutein and antioxidant dietary supplementation on contrast sensitivity in age-related macular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007;61:1121-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602626
  23. Woods RL, Wood JM. The role of contrast sensitivity charts and contrast letter charts in clinical practice. Clin Exp Optom 1995;78:43-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.1995.tb00787.x
  24. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading--II. Low vision. Vision Res 1985;25:253-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(85)90118-X
  25. Lovie-Kitchin JE, Mainstone JC, Robinson J, Brown B. What areas of the visual field are important for mobility in low vision patients. Vision Res 1990;5:249-63.

피인용 문헌

  1. Outcomes of Vitrectomy with Macular Membrane Peel in Eyes with Epiretinal Membrane and Coexisting Intermediate Stage Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration vol.6, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.21561/jor.2021.6.1.41