DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flight Test Hazard Identification

비행시험 위해요인 식별 연구

  • Kim, Mu-Geun (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Lim, In-Kyu (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Yoo, Beong-Seon (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Kang, Ja-Young (Aviation System Test and Certification Research Center, Korea Aerospace University)
  • 김무근 (한국항공대학교 항공체계시험인증연구센터) ;
  • 임인규 (한국항공대학교 항공체계시험인증연구센터) ;
  • 유병선 (한국항공대학교 항공체계시험인증연구센터) ;
  • 강자영 (한국항공대학교 항공체계시험인증연구센터)
  • Received : 2018.08.06
  • Accepted : 2018.08.24
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

Flight tests for aircraft development and certification have higher air accidents risk than other aerospace industries. Accordingly risk identification necessary for risk management in the safety management system is a very important factor in preventing similar air accidents during flight tests. But internationally issued accident statistics are usually confined to commercial transport aircraft and they do not reflect characteristics of flight tests, also databases to hazards identification during flight tests are not established or available in Republic of Korea. Therefore, we identified flight test procedures and traced the major causes of aviation accidents based on the statistics and preventive materials for risk management which were issued by international organizations and advanced countries of aviation. A total of 312 final reports classified as flight test among air accident/incident database held by U.S. NTSB were researched and about 200 flight test hazard were identified. The results of this study will be used as basic data for establishing the safety management system of the national comprehensive flight performance test site.

항공기 개발 및 인증 등을 위한 비행시험은 타 항공우주산업 분야 보다 높은 항공 사고 발생 리스크를 가지고 있다. 따라서 안전관리시스템 중 리스크 관리를 위해 필요한 위해요인 식별은 비행시험 중 유사한 항공 사고를 예방할 수 있는 매우 중요한 요소이다. 그러나 국제적으로 발행되는 사고 통계자료는 통상적으로 상업 운송용 항공기에 국한된 것으로 비행시험의 특성을 반영하지 못하고 있으며, 국내 여건 또한 비행시험 중 위해요인을 식별할 수 있는 각종 데이터베이스가 구축되어 있지 않거나 가용하지 않은 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 항공기의 개발 및 인증을 위한 비행시험 특성을 알아보고, 리스크 관리에 필요한 국제기구 및 항공선진국 등에서 구축한 항공 사고 통계 및 예방 자료 등을 기초로 항공 사고의 주요 원인을 추적해 보았다. 미국교통안전위원회가 보유하고 있는 항공 사고/준사고 데이터베이스 중 비행시험 시 발생한 총 312건의 최종 보고서가 조사되었으며, 약 200여개의 비행시험 위해 요인이 식별되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 국가종합 비행성능시험장의 안전관리시스템 구축을 위한 기초 자료로 활용될 예정이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yonhap news, Chinese passenger plane C919, flight stop due to serious problem, 2018.6.20. [Internet]. Available: http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2018/06/21/0200000000AKR20180621060800009.HTML?from=search
  2. Reuters, Mitsubishi says on track to deliver long-delayed jets by 2020, 2017.12.31. [Internet]. Available: http://www.businessinsider.com/r-mitsubishi-says-on-track-to-deliver-long-delayed-jets-by-2020-2017-12
  3. Flight Global, 787 suffers nose gear failure at VIP conversion site, 2018.3.22. [Internet]. Available: https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/787-suffers-nose-gear-failure-at-vip-conversion-site-446994/
  4. Collins Dictionary [Internet]. Available: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/flight-test
  5. DTaQ, Defense Science and Technology Glossary [Internet]. Available: http://dtims.dtaq.re.kr:8084/dictionary.do?method=main
  6. P. S. Kim, "Considerations on the flight test implementation for small airplane certification program," Journal of Aviation Development of Korea, Total No. 63, pp. 57-71, Oct . 2015.
  7. J. Y. Kang, M. G. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and I. K. Lim, "T&E process for safety-critical CNS/ATM systems", Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 51-58, Jan. 2017.
  8. Y. S. Jung, Comparison of flight test techniques on aircraft flight control system, Master thesis, Gyeongsang National University, Gyeongnam, S. Korea, 2004.
  9. R. Herman and M. Herschel "Integrated flight test environment-a concept for integration of simulation with flight test", Biennial Flight Test Conference, AIAA, South Carolina: SC, pp. 170-181, 1994.
  10. B. G. Lee, C. J. Kim, G. W. Kim, G. H. Han, and S. J. Park, Practical Flight Test Written by T-50 Aircraft Development Experience, Seoul, Korea: Cheongmungag, 2007.
  11. D. W. Ko, N. S. Choi, M. S. Kang, G. H. Kim, and G. S. Ryu, Development of civil aircraft based on KC-100 aircraft experience, Seoul, Korea, Cheongmungag, 2013.12.
  12. A. J. Stolzer and J. J. Goglia, Safety Management Systems in Aviation, 2nd ed, New York, NY: Routledge, 2015.
  13. ICAO, Accident Statistics [Internet]. Available: https://www.icao.int/safety/iStars/Pages/Accident-Statistics.aspx
  14. ICAO, Safety Report 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 [Internet]. Available: https://www.icao.int/safety/Pages/Safety-Report.aspx
  15. M. G. Kim, I. K. Lim, B. S. Yoo, and J. Y. Kang, "Flight test hazard identification for application of safety management system", in The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 2018 Spring Conference, Gyeonggi-do: Korea, pp. 317-320, May. 2018.
  16. IATA, Safety Report 2017, 2018. [Internet]. Available: https://aviation-safety.net/airlinesafety/industry/reports/IATA-safety-report-2017.pdf
  17. UK CAA CAP1036, Global Fatal Accident Review 2002-2011, 2013. [Internet]. Available: http://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?appid=11&mode=detail &id=5605
  18. EASA, Annual Safety Review 2017, 2017. [Internet]. Available: https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/general-publications/annual-safety-review-2017
  19. NTSB, Aviation: Data & Stats [Internet]. Available: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/data/Pages/Data_Stats.aspx