Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A development of an assessment system for stream physical environments in Korea

하천의 물리 환경 평가체계의 구축

  • Jung, Hea-Reyn (Department of Civil Engineering, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Heung (Department of Civil Engineering, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
  • 정혜련 (경남과학기술대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 김기흥 (경남과학기술대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2018.05.18
  • Accepted : 2018.06.15
  • Published : 2018.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to develop an assessment system for stream physical environments by considering stream characteristics. Comprehensively, the descriptions of and steam classification, assessing reach selection, contents of assessment categories and indexes are summarized. Since the physical structure of stream is results of reaction by stream power, streams were classified into three types (as high gradient stream, mid gradient stream and low gradient stream) according to the slope of channel, the grain size of bed material and the characteristics of channel topography. The scale of assessment reach was selected based on 10 or 25 times of channel width according to typical characteristics such as interval of step or riffle and sinuosity in each stream type. The assessment indexes were organized into common indicators such as channel stability, flow status, cross-section shape, bank stability, channel alteration and stream crossing structure, and characteristic indicators by stream type such as effective habitats, bed embeddedness, diversity of flow and frequency of step or riffle. To evaluate the applicability, the assessment system was applied to 9 streams and the results were analyzed and presented.

본 연구는 국내 하천의 고유성을 반영할 수 있는 물리적 환경평가 체계를 개발하는 것이다. 하천유형 분류, 평가구간 선정, 평가 항목 및 지표에 대하여 종합적으로 요약하였다. 하천의 물리적 구조는 하천 유수력에 의한 반응의 결과이므로 하도경사, 하상재료의 입경 및 하도지형의 특성에 따라 하천을 3가지 유형으로 분류하였다. 평가구간은 각 하천 유형의 대표적인 특징인 step 또는 여울출현 간격, 사행도에 따라 저수로 폭의 10배와 25배 기준으로 선정하였다. 평가지표는 하도 안정성, 흐름 상태, 횡단면 형상, 하안 안정성, 하도개수 및 하천횡단구조물과 같은 공통지표와 유효 서식지, 하상 매몰도, 흐름의 다양성 및 step과 여울 출현빈도와 같은 하천 유형별 특성지표로 구성되어 있다. 적용성 검토를 위하여 개발된 평가체계를 9개의 하천에 적용하고 그 결과를 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., and Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. EPA 841-B-99-002.
  2. Costa, J. E. (1983). Paleohydraulic reconstruction of flash flood peaks from boulder deposits in the Colorado Front Range. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 94, No. 8, pp. 986-1004. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1983)94<986:PROFPF>2.0.CO;2
  3. EPA (2004). Field operation manual. EPA 841-B-04-004.
  4. Hur, J. W., Park, J. W., Kang, S. U., and Kim, J. K. (2009). "Estimation of fish fauna and habitat suitability index in the Geum river basin." Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 516-527 (in Korean with English summary).
  5. Kang, H. S. (2012). "Comparision of physical habitat suitability index for fishes in the rivers of Han and Geum river watersheds." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1B, pp. 71-78 (in Korean with English summary).
  6. Kang, H. S., Im, D. K., Hur, J. W., and Kim, K. H. (2011). "Estimation of habitat suitability index of fish species in the Geum river watershed." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 2B, pp. 193-203 (in Korean with English summary).
  7. KICT (2007). Developement of multi-functional river restoration techniques. KICT 2007-122: 32-69 (in Korean with English summary).
  8. Kim, D. C., and Park, I. S. (1999). "A study on the evaluation criteria of stream naturalness for ecological environment restoration of stream corridors." Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 123-134 (in Korean with English summary).
  9. Kim, K. H. (2008). "Assessment of physical river disturbance in Namgang-dam downstream." Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 83-97 (in Korean with English summary).
  10. Kim, K. H. (2009). "Assessment of physical river disturbances by river improvement; Case study of Nam river and Youngcheon river." Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 74-86 (in Korean with English summary).
  11. Kim, K. H. (2010). "Analysis of correlation on physical characteristics and bed materials in natural rivers." Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 95-104 (in Korean with English summary).
  12. Kim, K. H., and Jung, H. R. (2015). "An application of stream classification systems in the Nam river, Korea." Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 118-127 (in Korean with English summary). https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2015.2.2.118
  13. Kim, K. H., Lee, H. R., and Jung, H. R. (2016). "An analysis on geomorphic and hydraulic characteristics of dominant discharge in Nam river." Journal of Korean Water Resources Association, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 83-94 (in Korean with English summary). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.2.83
  14. Kim, K. H., Lee, H. R., and Jung, H. R. (2018). "Characteristics of step-pool structure in the mountain streams around Mt. Jiri." Journal of Korean Water Resources Association, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 313-322 (in Korean with English summary).
  15. LAWA (Laenderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser) (2004). Gewasserstrukturgutekartierung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland - Ubersichtsverfahren, Berlin, Germany (in German).
  16. Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., and Miller, J. P. (1964), Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology, Freeman, San Francisco, CA, p. 522.
  17. Montgomery, D. R., and Buffington, J. M. (1993). Channel classification, prediction of channel response, and assessment of channel condition. Washington State Department of Natural Resources - Timber, Fish and Wildlife. Olympia, WA, USA, pp. 3-63.
  18. Montgomery, D. R., and Buffington, J. M. (1997). "Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins." Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 109, No. 5, pp. 596-611. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0596:CRMIMD>2.3.CO;2
  19. Park, B. J., Shin, J. I., and Jung, K. S. (2005). "The evaluation of river naturalness for biological habitat restoration: II. Application of evaluation method." Journal of Korean Water Resources Association, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 37-48 (in Korean with English summary). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2005.38.1.037
  20. Parsons, M., Thoms, M., and Norris, R. (2002). Australian River Assessment System: AusRivAS Physical Assessment Protocol. Monitoring River Heath Initiative Technical Report No. 22, Commonwealth of Australia and University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
  21. Rosgen, D. L. (1994). "A classification of natural rivers." Catena, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 169-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(94)90001-9
  22. SEPA (2003). Field survey guidance manual: 2003 version. Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Environmental Agency, Bristol, UK.
  23. Southwood, T. R. E. (1977). "Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies?" Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 46, pp. 337-365.
  24. Yamamoto, K. (1988). Channel specific analysis. Public Works Research Institute Report 1394 (in Japanese).