DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner

  • Kim, Dong-Yeon (Institute for Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Eun (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Jeon, Jin-Hun (Department of Dental Technology, Medical Campus, Kyung-Dong University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • Received : 2018.03.11
  • Accepted : 2018.06.26
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. To evaluate the reproducibility of scan-based abutments using a blue light model scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A wax cast abutment die was fabricated, and a silicone impression was prepared using a silicone material. Nine study dies were constructed using the prepared duplicable silicone, and the first was used as a reference. These dies were classified into three groups and scanned using a blue light model scanner. The first three-dimensional (3D) data set was obtained by scanning eight dies separately in the first group. The second 3D data set was acquired when four dies were placed together in the scanner and scanned twice in the second group. Finally, the third 3D data set was obtained when eight dies were placed together in the scanner and scanned once. These data were then used to define the data value using third-dimension software. All the data were then analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis H test (${\alpha}=.05$) and the post-hoc Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni's correction (${\alpha}=.017$). RESULTS. The means and standard deviations of the eight dies together were larger than those of the four dies together and of the individual die. Moreover, significant differences were observed among the three groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. With larger numbers of abutments scanned together, the scan becomes more inaccurate and loses reproducibility. Therefore, scans of smaller numbers of abutments are recommended to ensure better results.

Keywords

References

  1. Hung SH, Hung K-S, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
  2. Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:11-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90039-D
  3. Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60165-7
  4. Hamza TA, Sherif RM. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:762-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.011
  5. Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR, Scherer H, Loffler P, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/ CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:321-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.004
  6. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976
  7. Ciocca L, Ragazzini S, Fantini M, Corinaldesi G, Scotti R. Work flow for the prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic patients with a minimal-intervention CAD/CAM approach. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:22-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.014
  8. Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia P, Martinez-Rus F, Garcia-Orejas A, Salido MP, Pradies G. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:543-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.025
  9. Goracci C, Franchi L, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:422-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv077
  10. Atia MA, El-Gheriani AA, Ferguson DJ. Validity of 3 shape scanner techniques: A comparison with the actual plaster study casts. Biom Biostat Int J 2015;2:00026.
  11. Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:549-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019
  12. Keeling A, Wu J, Ferrari M. Confounding factors affecting the marginal quality of an intra-oral scan. J Dent 2017;59:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.003
  13. Lee JJ, Jeong ID, Park JY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.021
  14. Lee WS, Park JK, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC, Yu CH. New approach to accuracy verification of 3D surface models: An analysis of point cloud coordinates. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.002
  15. Mandelli F, Gherlone E, Gastaldi G, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a singletooth abutment model: A 3D analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:363-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.09.002
  16. Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015;46:9-17.
  17. Jeon JH, Jung ID, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner. Dent Mater J 2015;34:686-91. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-347
  18. Jeon JH, Kim DY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim WC. Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:214-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.214
  19. Jeon JH, Lee KT, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. White light scanner-based repeatability of 3-dimensional digitizing of silicon rubber abutment teeth impressions. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:452-6. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.4.452
  20. Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:755-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.007
  21. Jeon JH, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of 3D white light scanning of abutment teeth impressions: evaluation of trueness and precision. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:468-73. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.468
  22. Rudolph H, Salmen H, Moldan M, Kuhn K, Sichwardt V, Wostmann B, Luthardt RG. Accuracy of intraoral and extraoral digital data acquisition for dental restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2016;24:85-94. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150266
  23. Ulusoy AO, Calakli F, Taubin G. Robust one-shot 3D scanning using loopy belief propagation: Proceedings of the computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. San Francisco, CA, USA: 13-18 June 2010. p. 15-22.
  24. Bae SY, Park JY, Jeong ID, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:106-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.005
  25. Kim CM, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Threedimensional evaluation of the reproducibility of presintered zirconia single copings fabricated with the subtractive method. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:237-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.027
  26. Kim CM, Kim SR, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:624-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.014
  27. Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:260-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.007
  28. Kim DY, Jeong ID, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different coping arrangements fabricated by dental microstereolithography: Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in metal copings. J Dent Sci 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.06.006.
  29. Kim DY, Kim EB, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:463-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.463
  30. Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.008
  31. Park JY, Bae SY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:159-69. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.159
  32. Trifkovic B, Budak I, Todorovic A, Vukelic D, Lazic V, Puskar T. Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. Measurement 2014;47:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.051

Cited by

  1. 복합레진으로 제작한 인레이 보철물 구조에 따른 교합면 부위의 2차원 변연 적합도 및 내면 부위의 3차원 정확성 분석 vol.41, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2019.41.1.21
  2. A Comparative Study of the Fitness and Trueness of a Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Fabricated Using Two Digital Workflows vol.9, pp.14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142778
  3. 교합면의 교모형태에 따른 치과용 모형 스캐너의 정확도 평가 vol.42, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2020.42.4.313
  4. Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments vol.17, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017