DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CBCT study of mandibular first molars with a distolingual root in Koreans

  • Kim, Hee-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Jo, Hyoung-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Min, Jeong-Bum (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hwang, Ho-Keel (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2018.02.12
  • Accepted : 2018.04.09
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of a separate distolingual root and to measure the thickness of the buccal cortical bone in mandibular first molars in Koreans using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: High-quality CBCT data from 432 patients were analyzed in this study. The prevalence of a separate distolingual root of the mandibular first molar was investigated. The distance from the distobuccal and distolingual root apices to the outer surface of the buccal cortical bone was measured. We also evaluated the thickness of the buccal cortical bone. Results: The prevalence of a separate distolingual root (2 separate distal roots with 1 canal in each root; 2R2C) was 23.26%. In mandibular first molars with 2R2C, the distance from the distobuccal root apex to the outer surface of the buccal cortical bone was 5.51 mm. Furthermore, the distance from the distolingual root apex to the outer surface of the buccal cortical bone was 12.09 mm. In mandibular first molars with 2R2C morphology, the thickness of the buccal cortical bone at the distobuccal root apex of the mandibular first molar was 3.30 mm. The buccal cortical bone at the distobuccal root apex was significantly thicker in the right side (3.38 mm) than the left side (3.09 mm) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: A separate distolingual root is not rare in mandibular first molars in the Korean population. Anatomic and morphologic knowledge of the mandibular first molar can be useful in treatment planning, including surgical endodontic treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Song JS, Choi HJ, Jung IY, Jung HS, Kim SO. The prevalence and morphologic classification of distolingual roots in the mandibular molars in a Korean population. J Endod 2010;36:653-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.007
  2. Wang Y, Zheng QH, Zhou XD, Tang L, Wang Q, Zheng GN, Huang DM. Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular first permanent molars in a western Chinese population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2010;36:1786-1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.016
  3. Tu MG, Tsai CC, Jou MJ, Chen WL, Chang YF, Chen SY, Cheng HW. Prevalence of three-rooted mandibular first molars among Taiwanese individuals. J Endod 2007;33:1163-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.020
  4. Chen YC, Lee YY, Pai SF, Yang SF. The morphologic characteristics of the distolingual roots of mandibular first molars in a Taiwanese population. J Endod 2009;35:643-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.020
  5. De Moor RJ, Deroose CA, Calberson FL. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge. Int Endod J 2004;37:789-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00870.x
  6. Stephen C, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2005. Chapter 7, 20.
  7. Lin L, Skribner J, Shovlin F, Langeland K. Periapical surgery of mandibular posterior teeth: anatomical and surgical considerations. J Endod 1983;9:496-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80166-6
  8. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007;33:1121-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.011
  9. Tu MG, Huang HL, Hsue SS, Hsu JT, Chen SY, Jou MJ, Tsai CC. Detection of permanent three-rooted mandibular first molars by cone-beam computed tomography imaging in Taiwanese individuals. J Endod 2009;35:503-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.013
  10. Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J 2007;40:818-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01299.x
  11. Nair MK, Nair UP. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review. J Endod 2007;33:1-6.
  12. Choi MR, Moon YM, Seo MS. Prevalence and features of distolingual roots in mandibular molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2015;45:221-226. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.221
  13. Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2002;35:56-62. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00452.x
  14. Song JS, Kim SO, Choi BJ, Choi HJ, Son HK, Lee JH. Incidence and relationship of an additional root in the mandibular first permanent molar and primary molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e56-e60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.004
  15. Walker RT, Quackenbush LE. Three-rooted lower first permanent molars in Hong Kong Chinese. Br Dent J 1985;159:298-299. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805710
  16. Loh HS. Incidence and features of three-rooted permanent mandibular molars. Aust Dent J 1990;35:434-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb05426.x
  17. Curzon ME. Three-rooted mandibular permanent molars in English Caucasians. J Dent Res 1973;52:181. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345730520011901
  18. Huang RY, Cheng WC, Chen CJ, Lin CD, Lai TM, Shen EC, Chiang CY, Chiu HC, Fu E. Three-dimensional analysis of the root morphology of mandibular first molars with distolingual roots. Int Endod J 2010;43:478-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01702.x
  19. Kim SY, Yang SE. Cone-beam computed tomography study of incidence of distolingual root and distance from distolingual canal to buccal cortical bone of mandibular first molars in a Korean population. J Endod 2012;38:301-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.023
  20. Gutmann JL, Harrison JW. Posterior endodontic surgery: anatomical considerations and clinical techniques. Int Endod J 1985;18:8-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00415.x
  21. Matthews LS, Hirsch C. Temperatures measured in human cortical bone when drilling. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54:297-308. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197254020-00008
  22. Eriksson RA, Albrektsson T, Magnusson B. Assessment of bone viability after heat trauma. A histological, histochemical and vital microscopic study in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;18:261-268. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844318409052849

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of roots and canal systems of mandibular first molars in a vietnamese subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography vol.9, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_52_19
  2. Reproducibilidad en el diagnóstico imagenológico de periodontitis apical a partir de CBCT vol.10, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15446/aoc.v10n1.81133
  3. CBCT를 이용한 유구치의 치근 및 근관의 형태학적 평가 vol.47, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2020.47.1.25
  4. Preferred Reporting Items for Epidemiologic Cross-sectional Studies on Root and Root Canal Anatomy Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Technology: A Systematized Assessment vol.46, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.020