Hofstede Cultural Dimension Measuring through World Values Surveys

World Value Surveys를 활용한 Hofstede 문화차원 측정과 활용에 관한 연구

  • Kang, Mi-Young (Department of International Trade, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kwon, Jong-Wook (Department of Business Administraion, Kangwon National University)
  • 강미영 (강원대학교 국제무역학과) ;
  • 권종욱 (강원대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2018.06.01
  • Accepted : 2018.06.25
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Hofstede cultural value model is one of the most influential model for cross-cultural studies to measure national difference. In this study, we examine that Hofstede Cultural Dimensions can be measured by World Value Surveys. Selected WVS questions for 31 measurable countries after Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), approved valid through empirical analysis. It is applicable that Individualism values(IND) has related to 2 questionnaires including life satisfaction, Power Distance values(PDI) to 2 questionnaires about political action(Signing a petition and Joining in boycotts), Masculinity values(MAS) to 2 sexual-role questionnaires like "University is more important for a boy than for a girl", Uncertainty Avoidance values (UAI) to 3 questionnaires about confidence(Parliament, The Political parties and Justice System), Long-Term Oriented values(LTO) to 4 questionnaires including "How proud of nationality" and Indulgence versus Restraints values (IVR)to 2 questionnaires including Feeling of Happiness.

Keywords

References

  1. Barney, J. B. (1991), "Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage", Journal of Business Management, 17, 99-120.
  2. Hofstede, G. (1980), "Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Workrelated Values", Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
  3. Hofstede, G. (2001), "Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations(2nd ed.)", Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
  4. House, R. J., P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman and Gupta. (2004), "Culture, Leadership, and Organizations : The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies", Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  5. Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Post-modernization : Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  6. Kim, U., H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi and G. Yoon (1994), "Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications", Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  7. Mcsweeney, B. (2002), Hofstede's Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith-a Failure of Analysis, Human Relations.
  8. Murphy, E., J. Goerdon, and A. Mullen (2004), "A Preliminary Study Exploring the Value Changes Taking Place in the US since the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack on the World Trade Center in New York", Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020879.93654.86
  9. MW Li, MH Bond (2010), Value Change; Analyzing National Change in Citizen Secularism across Four Time Periods in the World Values Survey.
  10. Ronald Inglehart (1977), The Silent Revolution, Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  11. Samuel P. Huntington and Lawrence E. Harrison (2001), Cultures Matters: How Values Shape Human progress, New York: Basic Books.
  12. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, Robbert Maseland, and Andre Van hoorn (2015), "Are Scores on Hofstede's Dimensions of National Culture Stable over Time? A Cohort Analysis", Global Strategy Journal, 5(3), 19-45.
  13. R. A. Webber (1969), Convergence in Managerial Philosophy and Practice, in R.A. Webber(Hrsg.), Culture and Management (Homewood, Illinois).
  14. Schwartz, S. H. (2012), An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
  15. Vas Taras, Piers Steel, and Bradley L. Kirkman (2012), "Improving National Cultural Indices using a Longitudinal Meta-analysis of Hofstede's Dimensions", Journal of World Business, 47(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.001