Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제31권10호
  • /
  • Pages.1654-1659
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of dietary supplementation with fermented and non-fermented brown algae by-products on laying performance, egg quality, and blood profile in laying hens

  • Choi, Yongjun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Eun Chae (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Na, Youngjun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Sang Rak (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.21
  • 심사 : 2018.03.26
  • 발행 : 2018.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation with fermented and non-fermented brown algae by-products on the laying performance, egg quality, relative organ weight, and blood profile of laying hens. Methods: Hy-Line Brown chickens (n = 180; 70-week-old) were randomly divided into 5 groups with 4 replicates per group (3 hens per cage, 4 cages per replicate), and fed with 5 experimental diets, namely the basal control diet (CON) or the control diet supplemented with 0.5% brown seaweed (BS), 0.5% seaweed fusiforme (SF), 0.5% fermented brown seaweed (FBS), or 0.5% fermented seaweed fusiforme (FSF), for 4 weeks. Results: Egg production rate and egg mass were greater in the BS group than in the other groups (p<0.05), and the SF and FSF groups had greater egg production than the control group (p<0.05). Egg weight was higher in the BS group than in the other groups (p<0.05). There were no differences in eggshell color, egg yolk color, eggshell strength, or eggshell thickness among the groups. There was no difference in Haugh units among the treatment groups, except for the FSF group, which had a significantly lower value (p<0.05). The non-fermented groups had greater relative organ weights, particularly the liver and cecum, than the other groups (p<0.05). Regarding blood profile, the supplemented-diet groups had higher albumin levels than the control group (p<0.05). The FBS group had higher total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than the other groups (p<0.05). The BS and FBS groups had higher glutamic pyruvic transaminase levels than the other groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that dietary brown algae supplementation can improve egg-laying performance; however, supplementation with fermented seaweeds had no positive effect on the egg-laying performance of hens.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abudabos AM, Okab AB, Aljumaah RS, et al. Nutritional value of green seaweed (Ulva lactuca) for broiler chickens. Ital J Anim Sci 2013;12:e28. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e28
  2. Mustafa AR. Natural feed additives as immunostimulants in monogastric animal nutrition a a review. Ann Anim Sci 2017;17:605-25. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0076
  3. Iwamoto Y, Xu X, Tamura T, et al. Enzymatically depolymerized alginate oligomers that cause cytotoxic cytokine production in human mononuclear cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2003;67:258-63. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.67.258
  4. Baek IK, Maeng WJ, Lee SH, et al. Effects of the brown seaweed residues supplementation on in vitro fermentation and milk production and composition of lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci Technol 2004;46:373-86. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2004.46.3.373
  5. Koo JG, Choi YS, Kwak JK. Blood-anticoagulant activity of fucoidans from sporophylls of Undaria pinnatifida, Laminaria religiosa, Hizikia fusiforme and Sargassum fulvellum in Korea. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 2001;34:515-20.
  6. Maruyama H, Tamauchi H, Hashimoto M, et al. Antitumor activity and immune response of Mekabu fucoidan extracted from Sporophyll of Undaria pinnatifida. In vivo (Athens, Greece) 2003;17:245-9.
  7. de Souza MCR, Marques CT, Dore CMG, et al. Antioxidant activities of sulfated polysaccharides from brown and red seaweeds. J Appl Phycol 2007;19:153-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-006-9121-z
  8. El-Deek AA, Al-Harthi MA, Abdalla AA, et al. The use of brown algae meal in finisher broiler diets. Egypt Poult Sci 2011;3:767-81.
  9. Shobharani P, Halami PM, Sachindra NM. Potential of marine lactic acid bacteria to ferment Sargassum sp. for enhanced anticoagulant and antioxidant properties. J Appl Microbiol 2013;114:96-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12023
  10. Lin HTV, Lu WJ, Tsai GJ, et al. Enhanced anti-inflammatory activity of brown seaweed Laminaria japonica by fermentation using Bacillus subtilis. Process Biochem 2016;51:1945-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2016.08.024
  11. Patterson JA, Burkholder KM. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult Sci 2003;82:627-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.627
  12. Choi YJ, Lee SR, Oh JW. Effects of dietary fermented seaweed and seaweed fusiforme on growth performance, carcass parameters and immunoglobulin concentration in broiler chicks. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:862-70. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14015
  13. Sneath PH, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, et al. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Volume 2. Baltimore, MD, USA: Williams & Wilkins; 1986.
  14. NRC. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1994.
  15. An BK, Nishiyama H, Tanaka K, et al. Dietary safflower phospholipid reduces liver lipids in laying hens. Poult Sci 1997;76:689-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.5.689
  16. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O. SAS for mixed models. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute; 2007.
  17. O'Sullivan L, Murphy B, McLoughlin P, et al. Prebiotics from marine macroalgae for human and animal health applications. Mar Drugs 2010;8:2038-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8072038
  18. Kulshreshtha G, Rathgeber B, Stratton G, et al. Feed supplementation with red seaweeds, Chondrus crispus and Sarcodiotheca gaudichaudii, affects performance, egg quality, and gut microbiota of layer hens. Poult Sci 2014;93:2991-3001. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04200
  19. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, et al. Probiotics in poultry: modes of action. Worlds Poult Sci J 1997;53:351-68. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19970028
  20. Endo A, Nakamura S, Konishi K, et al. Variations in prebiotic oligosaccharide fermentation by intestinal lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2016;67:125-32. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2016.1147019
  21. Makkar HPS, Tran G, Heuze V, et al. Seaweeds for livestock diets: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;212:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.018
  22. Zhou TX, Chen YJ, Yoo JS, et al. Effects of chitooligosaccharide supplementation on performance, blood characteristics, relative organ weight, and meat quality in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2009;88:593-600. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00285
  23. Carew LB, McMurtry JP, Alster FA. Effects of methionine deficiencies on plasma levels of thyroid hormones, insulinlike growth factors-I and-II, liver and body weights, and feed intake in growing chickens. Poult Sci 2003;82:1932-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1932
  24. Rizk YS, Ismail II, Hafsa SHA, et al. Effect of dietary green tea and dried seaweed on productive and physiological performance of laying hens during late phage of production. Egypt Poult Sci 2017;37:685-706. https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2017.7534
  25. Kashap A, Ambade RB, Dalvi SH, et al. Study of serum biochemical metabolites during late laying phase of layer chicken. Indian Res J Ext Edu 2017;5-9.
  26. Will Castro LSEP, Gomes Castro AJ, da S. Nascimento Santos M, et al. Effect of galactofucan sulfate of a brown seaweed on induced hepatotoxicity in rats, sodium pentobarbital-induced sleep, and anti-inflammatory activity. J Appl Phycol 2016;28:2005-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0698-y

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of supplemental serine-protease from Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance and physiological change of broiler chickens vol.48, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1732986
  2. The effects of dietary seaweed inclusion on growth performance of broiler chickens: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.9, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25726.1
  3. Investigation of the effects of probiotic, Bacillus subtilis on stress reactions in laying hens using infrared thermography vol.15, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234117
  4. A Review of the Varied Uses of Macroalgae as Dietary Supplements in Selected Poultry with Special Reference to Laying Hen and Broiler Chickens vol.8, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8070536
  5. Seaweed Potential in the Animal Feed: A Review vol.8, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8080559
  6. Seaweeds, Intact and Processed, as a Valuable Component of Poultry Feeds vol.8, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8080620
  7. Effects of Dietary Inclusion of Seaweed, Heat Stress and Genetic Strain on Performance, Plasma Biochemical and Hematological Parameters in Laying Hens vol.10, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091570
  8. Effect of Bacillus velezensis to substitute in-feed antibiotics on the production, blood biochemistry and egg quality indices of laying hens vol.16, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02570-6
  9. Use of algae in poultry production: a review vol.76, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2020.1830012
  10. Valorization of Macroalgae through Fermentation for Aquafeed Production: A Review vol.7, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040304