DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Possible Improvement of Oocyte Supply by the use of Aged Mice and Different Gonadotrophins

  • Lee, Myungook (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ahn, Jong Il (Research Institutes of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwun, Hyosook (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ko, Dong Woo (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ahn, Jiyeon (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Jeong Mook (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2018.05.21
  • Accepted : 2018.06.27
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the influences of two human chorion gonadotrophins (hCGs) being injected into young or aged (45- to 65-week old) outbred (ICR) mice on developmental capacity of oocytes retrieved. In vitro-culture and parthenogenetic activation of oocytes retrieved were employed for the assessment. Superovulation was determined as being induced when more than 25 oocytes were retrieved. No aged mice were superovulated, while in contrast, 67-100% were superovulated in the 6- to 8-week-old (young) mice. In the aged, hCG injection yielded better retrieval (5 vs. 13 to 14.8 oocytes/mouse). Overall, no significant difference between two hCGs was detected but between the young and aged, significant differences in maturational arrest (0% vs. 39% MI arrest and 46% vs. 15% degeneration) and developmental capacity (24% vs. 46% 8-cell embryo development) were detected. In conclusion, hCG injection contributes to increasing oocyte retrieval from aged outbred mice, but the kinds of gonadotrophin influenced the efficiency of hyperstimulation induction in specific ages.

Keywords

References

  1. Auerbach, A.B., Norinsky, R., Ho, W., Losos, K., Guo, Q., Chatterjee, S. & Joyner, A.L., 2003. Strain-dependent differences in the efficiency of transgenic mouse production. Transgenic research, 12, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022166921766
  2. Byers, S.L., Payson, S.J. & Taft, R.A., 2006. Performance of ten inbred mouse strains following assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Theriogenology, 65, 1716-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.016
  3. Choi, J.K., Ahn, J.I., Park, J.H. & Lim, J.M., 2011. Derivation of developmentally competent oocytes by in vitro culture of preantral follicles retrieved from aged mice. Fertility and sterility, 95, 1487-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.062
  4. Ertzeid, G. & Storeng, R., 2001. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Human reproduction, 16, 221-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.2.221
  5. Gates, A.H. & Bozarth, J.L., 1978. Ovulation in the PMSG-treated immature mouse: effect of dose, age, weight, puberty, season and strain (BALB/c, 129 and C129F1 hybrid). Biology of reproduction, 18, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod18.3.497
  6. Johnson, L.W., Moffatt, R.J., Bartol, F.F. & Pinkert, C.A., 1996. Optimization of embryo transfer protocols for mice. Theriogenology, 46, 1267-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00298-1
  7. Legge, M. & Sellens, M.H., 1994. Optimization of superovulation in the reproductively mature mouse. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 11, 312-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215719
  8. Miao, Y.L., Kikuchi, K., Sun, Q.Y. & Schatten, H., 2009. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Human reproduction update, 15, 573-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp014
  9. Suzuki, O., Asano, T., Yamamoto, Y., Takano, K. & Koura, M., 1996. Development in vitro of preimplantation embryos from 55 mouse strains. Reproduction, fertility, and development, 8, 975-80. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9960975
  10. Tarin, J.J., Perez-Albala, S. & Cano, A., 2001. Cellular and morphological traits of oocytes retrieved from aging mice after exogenous ovarian stimulation. Biology of reproduction, 65, 141-50. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.1.141
  11. Te Velde, E.R. & Pearson, P.L., 2002. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Human reproduction update, 8, 141-54.
  12. Van Der Auwera, I. & D'hooghe, T., 2001. Superovulation of female mice delays embryonic and fetal development. Human reproduction, 16, 1237-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.6.1237
  13. Zarrow, M.X. & Wilson, E.D., 1961. The influence of age on superovulation in the immature rat and mouse. Endocrinology, 69, 851-5. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-69-4-851