DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Loss Aversion in International Environmental Agreements

  • Iris, Doruk (School of Economics, Sogang University) ;
  • Tavoni, Alessandro (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics)
  • Received : 2018.03.20
  • Accepted : 2018.04.23
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

We study the impact of loss-aversion and the threat of critical damages from insufficient pollutant abatement, which we jointly call threshold concerns, on the outcome of international environmental agreements. We aim to understand whether concerns for a critical level of damages induce cooperation among countries faced with the well-known free-riding problem, and yield sufficient emission reductions to avoid exceeding the threshold. Specifically, we focus on loss-averse countries negotiating under the threat of either high or low environmental damages. Under symmetry, when countries display identical degrees of threshold concern, we show that such beliefs have a positive effect on reducing the emission levels of both signatories to the treaty and non-signatories, leading to weakly larger coalitions of signatories than in the absence of reference dependence. We then introduce asymmetry, by allowing countries to differ in the degree of concern about the damages. We show that stable coalitions are mostly formed by the countries with higher threshold concerns. When enough countries exhibit standard preferences, the coalition size may diminish, regardless of the degree of concern by the others.

Keywords

References

  1. Barrett, S., "International Environmental Agreements as Games", In: Pethig, R. (Ed.), Conflict and Cooperation in Managing Environmental Resources. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992, pp. 11-37.
  2. Barrett, S., "Self-enforcing International Environmental Agreements", Oxford Economic Papers 46, 1994, pp. 878-894.
  3. Barrett, S., "The Theory of International Environmental Agreements", In: Maeler, K.-G., Vincent, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vol. 3, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005, pp. 1457-1516.
  4. Barrett, S., "Climate Treaties and Approaching Catastrophes", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 66, No. 2, 2013, pp. 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.12.004
  5. Bosetti, V., E. Weber, L. Berger, D. Budescu, N. Liu, and M. Tavoni, "COP21 Climate Negotiators' Responses to Climate Model Forecasts", Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2017.
  6. Bosetti, V., M. Heugues, and A. Tavoni, "Luring Others Into Climate Action: Coalition Formation Games with Threshold and Spillover Effects", Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 69, No. 2, 2017, pp. 410-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpx017
  7. Carraro, C. and D. Siniscalco, "Strategies for International Protection of the Environment", Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 52, 1993, pp. 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90037-T
  8. d'Aspremont, C., A. Jacquemin, J. Gabszewicz, and J. Weymark, "On the Stability of Collusive Price Leadership", Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1983, pp. 17-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/134972
  9. Dannenberg, A., S. Zitzelsberger, and A. Tavoni, "Climate Negotiators' and Scientists' Assessments of the Climate Negotiations", Nature Climate Change, online first, 2017.
  10. Dannenberg, A., G. Loschel, C. Paolacci, A. Reif, and A. Tavoni, "On the Provision of Public Goods with Probabilistic and Ambiguous Thresholds", Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2015, pp. 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9796-6
  11. Diamantoudi, E. and E. Sartzetakis, "Stable International Environmental Agreements: An Analytical Approach", Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2006, pp. 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00262.x
  12. Finus, M., "Game Theoretic Research on the Design of International Environmental Agreements: Insights, Critical Remarks, and Future Challenges", International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2008, pp. 29-67. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000011
  13. Hadjiyiannis, C., D. Iris, and C. Tabakis, "International Environmental Cooperation under Fairness and Reciprocity", The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-30.
  14. Hoel, M., "International Environment Conventions: The Case of Uniform Reductions of Emissions", Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1992, pp. 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00338240
  15. Iris, D., "Economic Targets and Loss-aversion in International Environmental Cooperation", Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2016, pp. 624-648. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12155
  16. Iris, D., J. Lee, and A. Tavoni, "Delegation and Public Pressure in a Threshold Public Goods Game: Theory and Experimental Evidence", Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 211, 2015.
  17. Iris, D. and A. Tavoni (forthcoming), Tipping and reference points in climate change games. Handbook on the Economics of Climate Change, Chichilnisky and Rezai (eds.), Edward Elgar Press, UK.
  18. IPCC, Summary for Policymakers, in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, T. F. Stocker et al., Eds. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge UK.
  19. Kahneman, D., A psychological perspective on economics. The American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2003, pp. 162-168. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321946985
  20. Karp, L. and L. Simon, "Participation Games and International Environmental Agreements: A Non-parametric Model", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2013, pp. 326-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.09.002
  21. Kolstad, C. D., "Equity, Heterogeneity and International Environmental Agreements", The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2010, pp. 1-17.
  22. Kobberling, V. and P. P. Wakker, "An Index of Loss Aversion", Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 122, No. 1, 2005, pp. 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.009
  23. Lade, S., A. Tavoni, S. Levin, and M. Schluter, "Regime Shifts in a Social-ecological System", Theoretical Ecology, Vol. 6, 2013, pp. 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-013-0187-3
  24. Lange, A., "The Impact of Equity-preferences on the Stability of International Environmental Agreements", Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 34, 2006, pp. 247-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-0006-4
  25. Lange, A. and C. Vogt, "Cooperation in International Environmental Negotiations Due to a Preference for Equity", Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 87, No. 9-10, 2003, pp. 2049-2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00044-0
  26. McGinty, M., "International Environmental Agreements Among Asymmetric Nations", Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 59, No. 1, 2007, pp. 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpl028
  27. Marchiori, C., S. Dietz, and A. Tavoni, "Domestic Politics and the Formation of International Environmental Agreements", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 81, 2017, pp. 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.009
  28. Mendez, L. and R. Trelles, "The Abatement Market a Proposal for Environmental Cooperation Among Asymmetric Countries", Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2000, pp. 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008316806709
  29. Nyborg, K., Reciprocal Climate Negotiators. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8866, 2015.
  30. Pavlova, Y. and A. de Zeeuw, "Asymmetries in International Environmental Agreements", Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 18, 2013, pp. 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000289
  31. Rockstrom, J. et al., A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 2009, pp. 472-475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
  32. Scheffer, M., S. Carpenter, J. A. Foley, C. Folke, and B. Walker, Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 2001, pp. 591-596. https://doi.org/10.1038/35098000
  33. Tavoni, A., A. Dannenberg, G. Kallis, and A. Loschel, "Inequality, communication and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, No. 29, 2011, pp. 11825-11829. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102493108
  34. Tavoni, A. and S. Levin, "Managing the Climate Commons at the Nexus of Ecology", Behaviour and Economics. Nature Climate Change 4, 2014, pp. 1057-1063. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2375
  35. Vasconcelos, V. V., F. C. Santos, J. M. Pacheco, and S. A. Levin, Climate policies under wealth inequality, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Vol. 111, No. 6, 2014, pp. 2212-2216. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323479111