DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Nonagenarian Patients: Is It Really Safe?

  • Sobani, Zain A (Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center) ;
  • Yunina, Daria (Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center) ;
  • Abbasi, Anna (Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center) ;
  • Tin, Kevin (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center) ;
  • Simkin, Daniel (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center) ;
  • Rojas, Mary (Department of Health Services Research, Maimonides Medical Center) ;
  • Tsirlin, Yuriy (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center) ;
  • Mayer, Ira (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center) ;
  • Rahmani, Rabin (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.08
  • 심사 : 2017.08.18
  • 발행 : 2018.07.30

초록

Background/Aims: Literature on the safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in elderly patients is divided. Based on this we decided to examine the safety of ERCP in nonagenarian patients. Methods: A total of 1,389 patients, with a mean age of $63.94{\pm}19.62$ years, underwent ERCP during the study period. There were 74 patients aged 90 years or older with a mean age of $92.07{\pm}1.8$. Logistic regression showed that nonagenarian patients had a significantly increased odds of in-patient mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=9.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]=4, 23; $p{\leq}0.001$). Charlson Comorbidity Index $(CCI){\geq}2$ was also an independent predictor of in-patient mortality (AOR=2.4; 95% CI=1.2, 5.2; p=0.021). Age ${\geq}90$ was not associated with increased adverse events; however emergency procedures (AOR=2.4; 95% CI=1.5, 4; p<0.001) and $CCI{\geq}2$ (AOR=2.6; 95% CI=1.7, 4.0; p<0.001) were more likely to have adverse events. Conclusions: Age ${\geq}90$ and $CCI{\geq}2$ are independently associated with increased odds of in-patient mortality in patients undergoing ERCP, whereas emergency procedures and $CCI{\geq}2$ are associated with an increased adverse event rate. Caution must be exercised when considering ERCP in patients aged ${\geq}90$ years and those with a $CCI{\geq}2$.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Xu J, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2015. NCHS Data Brief 2016:1-8.
  2. Day LW, Lin L, Somsouk M. Adverse events in older patients undergoing ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2014;2:E28-E36. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1365281
  3. Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Biliary tract diseases in the elderly: management and outcomes. Gut 1997;41:433-435. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.41.4.433
  4. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1781-1788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x
  5. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Anderson MA, Fisher L, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:467-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.010
  6. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-918. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199609263351301
  7. Baillie J. ERCP in the elderly: handle with care. Endosc Int Open 2014;2:E43-E44. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1365483
  8. Cariani G, Di Marco M, Roda E, Solmi L. Efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:471-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.005
  9. Gronroos JM, Salminen P, Laine S, Gullichsen R. Feasibility of ERCP procedures in patients 90 years of age and older. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010;44:227-228. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181b3830f
  10. Hu L, Sun X, Hao J, et al. Long-term follow-up of therapeutic ERCP in 78 patients aged 90 years or older. Sci Rep 2014;4:4918.
  11. Huguet JM, Sempere J, Bort I, et al. [Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients aged more than 90 years old]. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;28:263-266. https://doi.org/10.1157/13074059
  12. Hui CK, Liu CL, Lai KC, et al. Outcome of emergency ERCP for acute cholangitis in patients 90 years of age and older. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19:1153-1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01962.x
  13. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, Zavos C, Beltsis A, Tzovaras G. Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.051
  14. Mitchell RM, O'Connor F, Dickey W. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe and effective in patients 90 years of age and older. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;36:72-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200301000-00019
  15. Rodriguez-Gonzalez FJ, Naranjo-Rodriguez A, Mata-Tapia I, et al. ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:220-225. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.363
  16. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:187-191. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2000.107285
  17. Yun DY, Han J, Oh JS, Park KW, Shin IH, Kim HG. Is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography safe in patients 90 years of age and older? Gut Liver 2014;8:552-556. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl13310
  18. Finkelmeier F, Tal A, Ajouaou M, et al. ERCP in elderly patients: increased risk of sedation adverse events but low frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;82:1051-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.032
  19. Fisher L, Fisher A, Thomson A. Cardiopulmonary complications of ERCP in older patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:948-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.020

피인용 문헌

  1. Age is Important, but Patient Status is also Important in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography vol.51, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.122
  2. Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients? vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12198
  3. The efficacy and safety of colonoscopy in nonagenarians: A multicenter study vol.39, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-020-01066-3
  4. Long-term Outcomes of Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis in Patients ≥90 Years Old: A Multicenter Retrospective Study vol.60, pp.13, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.6478-20