DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

생태계 네트워크 분석을 이용한 생물 군집의 구조와 기능에 대한 연구: 청계천을 사례로

Exploring Community Structure and Function with Network Analysis: a Case Study of Cheonggye Stream

  • 이민영 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 김용은 (고려대학교 환경생태연구소) ;
  • 조기종 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과)
  • Lee, Minyoung (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Yongeun (Institute of Environment and Ecology, Korea University) ;
  • Cho, Kijong (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.30
  • 심사 : 2018.09.12
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30

초록

It is important to consider interaction between species in understanding structure and function of the biological community. Current ecological issues such as climate change and habitat loss emphasize the significance of the concept of species interaction in that varying species' interaction across environmental gradients may lead to altered ecological function and services. However, most community studies have focused on species diversity through analysis of quantitative indices based on species composition and abundance data without considering species interactions in the community. 'Ecological network analysis' based on network theory enables exploration of structural and functional properties of ecosystems composed of various species and their interactions. In this paper, network analysis of Cheonggye stream as a case study was presented to promote uses of network analysis on ecological studies in Korea. Cheonggye stream has a simple biological structure with link density of 1.48, connectance 0.07, generality 4.43, and vulnerability 1.94. The ecological network analysis can be used to provide ecological interpretations of domestic long-term monitoring data and can contribute to conserving and managing species diversity in ecosystems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae JI, HC Shin, SI Hwang and JH Lee. 2018. Distribution of sedimentation environments and benthic macro-fauna communities in habitats and non-habitats of Zostera marina on the Yeongheung-do tidal flats, West coast of Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 36:107-116.
  2. Bae KS, GC Lim, KR Kim, KH Kim, KS Lee, HS Cho and MH Lee. 2012. Benthic macroinvertebrate community of Hongje and Bulgwang streams in Seoul. Korean J. Nat. Conserv. 10:101-114. https://doi.org/10.30960/kjnc.2012.10.1_2.101
  3. Barbosa M, GW Fernandes, OT Lewis and RJ Morris. 2017. Experimentally reducing species abundance indirectly affects food web structure and robustness. J. Anim. Ecol. 86:327-336.
  4. Bartomeus I, D Gravel, JM Tylianakis, MA Aizen, IA Dickie and M Bernard-Verdier. 2016. A common framework for identifying linkage rules across different types of interactions. Funct. Ecol. 30:1894-1903.
  5. Bersier LF, CB Richter and MF Cattin. 2002. Quantitative descriptions of food-web matrices. Ecology 83:2394-2407. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2394:QDOFWM]2.0.CO;2
  6. Borrett SR, J Moody and A Edelmann. 2014. The rise of network ecology: maps of the topic diversity and scientific collaboration. Ecol. Modell. 293:111-127.
  7. Delmas E, M Besson, MH Brice, LA Burkle, GVD Riva, MJ Fortin, D Gravel, PR Guimaraes Jr, DH Hembry, EA Newman, JM Olesen, MM Pires, JD Yeakel and T Poisot. 2018. Analysing ecological networks of species interactions. Biol. Rev. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12433.
  8. Dunne JA, U Brose, RJ Williams and ND Martinez. 2005 Modeling food-web dynamics: complexity-stability implications. In: Aquatic food webs: An ecosystem approach, Belgrano et al.(eds.), OUP Oxford. pp. 117-129.
  9. Gray C, DH Figueroa, LN Hudson, A Na, D Perkins and G Woodward. 2015. Joining the dots: An automated method for constructing food webs from compendia of published interactions. Food Webs 5:11-20.
  10. Hong E, Y Kim, JC Jeong, SH Kang, JK Jung and SW Suk. 2017. Community structure and distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Sobaeksan National Park, Korea. J. Ecol. Environ. 41:17.
  11. Issac P, M Robert, H Le Bris, J Rault, L Pawlowski and D Kopp. 2017. Investigating feeding ecology of two anglerfish species, Lophius piscatorius and Lophius budegassa in the Celtic Sea using gut content and isotopic analyses. Food Webs 13:33-37.
  12. Kang YH, SJ Ju and YG Park. 2012. Predicting impacts of climate change on Sinjido marine food web. Ocean Polar Res. 34:239-251.
  13. Kohonen T. 1982. Analysis of a simple self-organizing process. Biol. Cybern. 44:135-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317973
  14. Layman CA, ST Giery, S Buhler, R Rossi, T Penland, MN Henson, AK Bogdanoff, MV Cove, AD Irizarry, CM Schalk and SK Archer. 2015. A primer on the history of food web ecology: Fundamental contributions of fourteen researchers. Food webs 4:14-24.
  15. Margalef R. 1958. Information theory in ecology. General Systems 3:36-71.
  16. Martinez ND. 1992. Constant connectance in community food webs. Am. Nat. 139:1208-1218.
  17. Maunsell SC, RL Kitching, CJ Burwell and RJ Morris. 2015. Changes in host-parasitoid food web structure with elevation. J. Anim. Ecol. 84:353-363.
  18. McCann K. 2007. Protecting biostructure. Nature 446:29. https://doi.org/10.1038/446029a
  19. McNaughton SJ. 1967. Relationship among functional properties of California grassland. Nature 216:168-169.
  20. Morris RJ, FH Sinclair and CJ Burwell. 2015. Food web structure changes with elevation but not rainforest stratum. Ecography 38:792-802. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01078
  21. Park HK, JK Choi, KH Won and HG Lee. 2017. Study on the evaluation of ecological health by using fish communities in the Wonju stream, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 35:684-693.
  22. Park YJ, YL Jeon, KD Kim, HN Yoon and SH Nam. 2013. Community analysis and biological water quality evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrate in Wangpi-cheon watershed. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 27:327-343.
  23. Petchey OL, AP Beckerman, JO Riede and PH Warren. Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 105:4191-4196.
  24. Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological diversity. Wiley Interscience Publication. p. 165.
  25. Poisot T, DB Stouffer and S Kefi. 2016. Describe, understand and predict: why do we need networks in ecology? Funct. Ecol. 30:1878-1882.
  26. R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  27. R Studio Team. 2018. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RSudio, Inc., Boston, MA.
  28. Shannon CE and W Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  29. Thompson RM, U Brose, JA Dunne, RO Hall Jr, S Hladyz, RL Kitching, ND Martinez, H Rantala, TN Romanuk, DB Stouffer and JM Tylianakis. 2012. Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27:689-697.
  30. Tylianakis JM and RJ Morris. 2017. Ecological networks across environmental gradients. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48:25-48.
  31. Tylianakis JM, T Tscharntke and OT Lewis. 2007. Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host-parasitoid food webs. Nature 445:202-205.
  32. Valladares G, L Cagnolo and A Salvo. 2012. Forest fragmentation leads to food web contraction. Oikos 121:299-305.
  33. Warren PH. 1994. Making connections in food webs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:136-141.
  34. Yoon JD, SH Park, KH Chang, JY Choi, GJ Joo, GS Nam and MH Jang. 2015. Characteristics of fish fauna in the lower Geum River and identification of trophic guilds using stable isotopes analysis. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 33:34-44.