Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Finite Element Model Updating of Simple Beam Considering Boundary Conditions

경계조건을 고려한 단순보의 유한요소모델개선

  • Received : 2017.10.31
  • Accepted : 2017.11.20
  • Published : 2018.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this present study, in order to update the finite element model considering the boundary conditions, a method has been proposed. The conventional finite element model updating method, updates the finite element model by using the dynamic characteristics (natural frequency, mode shape) which can be estimated from the ambient vibration test. Therefore, prediction of the static response of an actual structure is difficult. Furthermore, accurate estimation of the physical properties is relatively hard. A novel method has been proposed to overcome the limitations of conventional method. Initially, the proposed method estimates the rotational spring constant of a finite element model using the deflection of structure and the rotational displacement of support measurements. The final updated finite element model is constructed by estimating the material properties of the structure using the finite element model with updated rotational spring constant and the dynamic characteristics of the structure. The proposed finite element model updating method is validated through numerical simulation and compared with the conventional finite element model updating method.

본 논문에서는 지점부 경계조건을 고려하여 단순보의 유한요소모델을 개선하는 기법을 제안하였다. 기존의 유한요소모델개선 기법은 주로 가속도 응답으로부터 추정된 동특성(고유진동수, 모드형상)을 이용하여 유한요소모델을 개선하였다. 이렇게 개선된 유한요소모델은 실제 구조물의 정적응답을 예측하기 어렵고, 잘못된 구조물의 물성치를 추정하는 문제가 발생한다. 제안된 기법은 먼저, 구조물의 처짐과 지점부 회전변위를 계측하여 지점부 경계조건을 간략화한 유한요소모델의 회전 스프링 강성을 정량적으로 추정한다. 회전 스프링 강성이 개선된 유한요소모델과 구조물의 동특성을 사용하여 구조물의 물성치를 추정함으로써 최종 개선된 유한요소모델을 구축된다. 제안된 유한요소모델 개선 기법과 기존 유한요소모델개선 기법을 수치해석 시뮬레이션을 통하여 비교 및 검증하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alemdar Bayraktar and Ahmet Can (2010), Finite Element Model Updating of Komurhan Highway Bridge Based on Experimental Measurements, Smart Structures and Systems, 6(4), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.4.373
  2. Brincker, R., Zhang, L., and Andersen, P. (2001), Modal Identification of Output-only Systems Using Frequency Domain Decomposition, Smart Materials and Structures, IOP, 10(3), 441-445, ISSN 0964-1726. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303
  3. Brownjohn, J. M. W., Moyo, P., Omenzetter, P., and Lu, Y. (2003), Assessment of Highway Bridge Upgrading by Dynamic Testing and Finite- Element Model Updating, Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 8(3), 162-172, ISSN 1084-0702. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:3(162)
  4. Jaishi, B., Kim, H. J., Kim, M. K., Ren, W. X., and Lee, S. H. (2007). Finite Element Model Updating of Concrete-filled Steel Tubular Arch Bridge Under Operational Condition Using Modal Flexibility, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21, 2406-2426, ISSN 08883270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.01.003
  5. Jung, D. S., and Kim, C. Y. (2011), Finite Element Model Updating on Small-scale Bridge Model Using the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(5):481-495, 2013. ISSN 1573-2479. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2011.564635
  6. Kim, H. J., Cho, S. J., and Sim, S. H. (2015), Finite Element Model Updating Based on Data Fusion of Acceleration and Angular Velocity, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 19(2), 60-67, ISSN 2234-6937. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2015.19.2.060
  7. Liao, J., Tang, G., Meng, L., Liu, H., and Zhang, Y. (2012). Finite Element Model Updating based on Field Quasi-static Generalized Influence Line and Its Bridge Engineering Application, Procedia Engineering, 31, 348-353, ISSN 18777058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1035
  8. McCall, J. (2005). Genetic Algorithms for Modelling and Optimisation, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 184(1), 205-222, ISSN 0377-0427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2004.07.034
  9. Nelder, B. J. and Mead, R. (1965), A Simplex Method for Function Minimization, The Computer Journal, 7(4), 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
  10. Park, W., Park, J. Y., and Kim, H. K. (2015). Candidate Model Construction of a Cable-stayed Bridge Using Parameterised Sensitivity-based Finite Element Model Updating, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(9), 1163-1177, ISSN 1573-2479. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.938662
  11. Park, Y. S., Kim, S., Kim, N., and Lee, J. J. (2017). Finite Element Model Updating Considering Boundary Conditions Using Neural Networks, Engineering Structures, 150, 511-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.032
  12. Ren, W. X., Fang, S. E., and Deng, M. Y. (2011). Response Surface - based Finite-element-model Updating Using Structural Static Responses, Journal Eng Mech-ASCE, 137, 248-257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000223
  13. Sanayei, M., Phelps, J. E., Sipple, J. D., and Bell, E. S. (2012), Instrumentation, Nondestructive Testing, and Finite-element Model Updating for Bridge Evaluation Using Strain Measurements, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000228
  14. Schlune, H., Plos, M., and Gylltoft, K. (2009), Improved Bridge Evaluation Through Finite Element Model Updating Using Static and Dynamic Measurements, Engineering Structures, 31(7), 1477-1485, ISSN 01410296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.011
  15. Wang, H., Li, A. Q., and Li, J. (2010). Progressive Finite Element Model Calibration of a Long-span Suspension Bridge based on Ambient Vibration and Static Measurements, Engineering Structures, 32(9), 2546-2556, ISSN 01410296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.028
  16. Xiao, X., Xu, Y., and Zhu, Q. (2014), Multiscale Modeling and Model Updating of a Cable-stayed Bridge, II: Model Updating Using Modal Frequencies and Influence Lines, Journal Bridge Eng., ASCE, 20(10), 1943-5592.