DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Performance Evaluation System of Conventional(ASSM) Road Tunnels

재래식(ASSM) 도로터널의 성능평가 체계 연구

  • 박광림 (한국시설안전공단 진단본부) ;
  • 정지승 (동양대학교 철도건설안전공학과)
  • Received : 2017.12.26
  • Accepted : 2018.06.29
  • Published : 2018.07.01

Abstract

Although the current evaluation system has been revised four times since it was revised in 1996, it is insufficient to utilize it as a basis for predicting the performance degradation from the long-term viewpoint and prioritization decision for the budget input due to the evaluation system limited to securing the structural safety. Therefore, this study proposes a new evaluation system suitable for the performance evaluation of conventional (ASSM) tunnels among the various types of existing road tunnels using Delphi technique and AHP technique. Since the existing evaluation systems and evaluation items in domestic and overseas are limited in scope of evaluation criteria, the survey was conducted in conjunction with closed questionnaires on existing items and open questionnaires for eliciting new items. The validity of the questionnaire results were verified and the performance evaluation factors suitable for conventional (ASSM) tunnels were derived. After calculating weighted value of the derived evaluation item using AHP technique, a new evaluation system is proposed to meet the characteristics of the ASSM tunnel, so that they can be used as reference materials for revising and supplementing detailed guidelines of performance evaluation in the future.

현재 적용되고 있는 평가체계는 1996년 개정되어 이후 4차례 개정을 실시하였으나, 구조적 안전성의 확보 목표에 국한된 평가체계로 인해 장기적 관점의 성능저하 예측 및 예산투입을 위한 우선순위 의사결정의 근거로 활용하기에는 부족하다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 델파이 기법과 AHP기법을 활용하여 기존 도로터널의 여러 구조형식 중 재래식(ASSM) 터널의 성능평가에 적합한 평가체계를 새롭게 제시하고자 한다. 국 내외의 기존 평가체계 및 평가항목을 검토한 결과, 도출가능한 평가항목이 한정적인 것으로 판단되어 기존에 적용되고 있는 항목에 대한 폐쇄적인 설문과 새로운 항목 도출을 위한 개방형 설문을 병행하여 설문조사를 실시하였다. 조사한 설문결과를 내용타당도 검증을 거쳐 재래식(ASSM)터널에 적합한 성능평가인자를 도출하였으며, AHP기법을 활용하여 도출된 평가항목에 대한 가중치를 산정한 후 구조물의 특성에 맞는 성능평가 체계를 새롭게 제시하여, 향후 성능평가 세부지침 수정 및 보완 시 참고자료로 활용될 수 있도록 하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, M., &Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 3-33.
  2. Jerry, A. (2008). Effective Use of the Delphi Process in Research; Its Characteristics, Strengths and Limitations, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, 1-8.
  3. KISTEC(2001), Establishment of criteria for condition evaluation of structures (tunnel).
  4. KISTEC(2002), Tunnel Maintenance Manual.
  5. KISTEC(2016), Detailed Instructions of Safety Inspection and Precision Safety Diagnosis, Tunnel, 1-171 (in Korean).
  6. Lawshe, C.H(1975), A UANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY, Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  7. Park, K. R. and Chung, J. S. (2017), A Study of Evaluation system of NATM Tunnel using Delphi and AHP, Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection, 21(5), 25-34.
  8. Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
  9. Saaty, T.L. (1990), Multicriteria Decision Marking: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP series I, RWS Publication.
  10. Saaty, T.L. (2008), Decision marking with the analytic hierarchy Process, Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  11. Seung-il Na(1999), A study on the contents of general agricultural education for elementary.middle.high school students in the information society, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, KSI KISS, 31(1), 21-42.
  12. Yong Seung No(2006). Delphi Technique; Get predictive insights from professional insights, KRIHS, 299, 53-62.