DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Seismic Capacity of R/C Building Damaged by the 2016 Gyeongju Earthquake Based on the Non-linear Dynamic Analysis

비선형동적해석에 의한 2016년 경주지진에서 지진피해를 받은 R/C 건물의 내진성능에 관한 연구

  • 투고 : 2017.10.17
  • 심사 : 2017.10.31
  • 발행 : 2018.01.01

초록

On September 12, 2016, the Gyeongju District was strongly shaken with M=5.8, which was the largest one since measured by the actual seismometer in Korea, and some buildings were damaged. The field survey of reinforced concrete school buildings in the affected area was carried out, and their residual seismic capacities(R) were estimated based on the Japanese Standard for post-earthquake damage evaluation. In this study, the M school, which was greatly damaged by the 2016 Gyeongju Earthquake, was selected, and its damage level was evaluated on the basis of the Japanese Standard. The seismic capacity of the M school was also evaluated using the nonlinear dynamic analysis, and relationships between its damage level and seismic capacity was also conducted to investigate causes of earthquake damage. The damage level of M school was classified into light with R=88.2%. The result of the dynamic analysis agreed reasonably well with the damage of M school sustained by the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake. This will provide fundamental data for earthquake preparedness measures, such as the seismic rehabilitation of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings in Korea.

2016년 경주지진 이후로 국내에서도 본격적으로 건축물의 지진대책 강구가 시급한 시점에서 국내에 널리 보급되어 있는 R/C 건축물의 효율적인 내진성능 평가 및 내진보강을 포함한 내진대책을 위한 기초적인 자료를 얻고자, 2016년 경주지진에서 지진피해를 받은 R/C 저층 학교건축물(M학교)을 대상으로 지진피해도구분판정법을 이용하여 잔존내진성능과 지진피해정도를 평가함과 동시에, 부재수준의 비선형동적해석을 수행하여 지진피해정도와의 상관관계를 검토하였다. 지진피해도구분판정에 의한 손상도-I로 분류된 기둥은 2개, 손상도-II가 1개, 손상도-III으로 분류된 기둥이 3개로 각각 평가되어, 최종적으로 평가한 내진성능잔존율(R)은 88.2%로 피해분류는 소규모 피해로 판정되었으며, 또한 비선형동적해석 결과 1층 X방향의 최대응답을 나타낸 기둥의 휨변위는 0.7 mm, 전단변위는 6 mm로 전단균열은 발생하였지만, 전단파괴는 발생하지 않았다. 경주지진에서 지진피해를 입은 M학교의 지진피해가 1층의 X방향에 집중되어 있다는 사실, 휨균열보다는 전단균열이 발생하였다는 사실을 고려한다면 본 연구에서 수행한 비선형동적해석 결과는 2016년 경주지진에서 지진피해를 받은 M학교의 지진피해상황을 잘 반영하고 있다고 사료되며, 국내 기존 저층 R/C 건축물의 효율적인 내진성능 평가 및 내진보강을 포함한 내진대책을 위한 기초적인 자료로서 활용가능하다고 사료된다.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hisano, M., and Okada, T. (1975). Earthquake response of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings with structural walls: SDOF parallel wall-frame system, Proceedings of the Architectural Institute of Japan Annual Convention, 481-482.
  2. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA, 2001). Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, 9-147.
  3. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA, 2005). Standard for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings, 1-50.
  4. Lee, K. S. (2012). A experiment report of existing low-rise R/C frames without seismic detail in Korea, Chonnam National University.
  5. Li, K. N. (2012). CANNY for Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Structural Analysis.
  6. Li, K. N. and Otani S. (1993). Multi-Spring Model for 3-Dimensional Analysis of RC Members, Journal of Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 1, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1993.1.1.017
  7. Osaki, Y. (1994). An Introduction to Spectral Analysis of Earthquake Motions, Kajima Press, Tokyo, Japan.
  8. Otani, S., (1974). Inelastic Analysis of RC Frame Structures, Proceedings of ASCE, 100, No. ST7.
  9. The Ministry of Education and Education Facility Association (MOE and EDUFA, 2016), Quick Report of School Buildings damaged by 2016 Gyoungju Earthquake, Gyoungju District, 1-50.
  10. Umemura, H. (1973). Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Accounting for the Dynamic Effects of Earthquakes, Giho-do Publishing Co., Japan.

피인용 문헌

  1. 학교 건축물의 내진 보강을 위한 가새 - 높이비에 관한 연구 vol.24, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2020.24.4.10