Acknowledgement
Supported by : SeoulTech (Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
References
- Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotech. 2014;32(8):773-85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958.
- Gu BK, Choi DJ, Park SJ, Kim MS, Kang CM, Kim CH. 3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications. Biomater. Res. 2016;20(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0058-2.
- Ahn HJ, Khalmuratova R, Park SA, Chung EJ, Shin HW, Kwon SK. Serial analysis of tracheal restenosis after 3D-printed scaffold implantation: recruited inflammatory cells and associated tissue changes. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 14(5):631-9.
- Kaushik SN, Kim B, Walma A, Choi SC, Wu H, Mao JJ, Jun HW, Cheon K. Biomimetic microenvironments for regenerative endodontics. Biomater Res. 2016;20:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0061-7
- Jakus AE, Rutz AL, Shah RM. Advancing the field of 3D biomaterial printing. Biomed Mater. 2016;11:014102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/014102
- Shafiee A, Atala A. Printing technologies for medical applications. Trends Mol Med. 2016;22(3):254-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2016.01.003.
- Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, Duocastella M, Pippenger B, Bellance S, Bareille R, Remy M, Bordenave L, Amedee J, Guillemot F. Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials. 2010;31(28):7250-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055.
- Guvendiren M, Molde J, Soares RM, Kohn J. Designing biomaterials for 3D printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(10):1679-93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121.
- Ozbolat IT, Peng W, Ozbolat V. Application areas of 3D bioprinting. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21(8):1257-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.006.
- Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I. A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: past, present and future. Biomaterials. 2016;102:20-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
- Nakamura M, Kobayashi A, Takagi F, Watanabe A, Hiruma Y, Ohuchi K, Iwasaki Y, Horie M, Morita I, Takatani S. Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed seeding of individual living cells. Tissue Eng. 2005; 11(11-12):1658-66. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.1658
- Wilson WC, Boland T. Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers. Anat Rec Part A. 2003;272(2):491-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.10057.
- Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, Forgacs G, Markwald RR. Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21(4):157-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00033-7
- Morris VB, Nimbalkar S, Younesi M, McClellan P, Akkus O. Mechanical properties, cytocompatibility and manufacturability of chitosan: PEGDA hybridgel scaffolds by stereolithography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(1):286-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1643-1
- Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, Samanipour R, Ghosh S, Kim K. A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication. 2015;7(4):045009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009
- Elomaa L, Pan CC, Shanjani Y, Malkovskiy A, Seppala JV, Yang Y. Threedimensional fabrication of cell-laden biodegradable poly (ethylene glycolco-depsipeptide) hydrogels by visible light stereolithography. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3(42):8348-58. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB01468A
- Barron JA, Spargo BJ, Ringeisen BR. Biological laser printing of three dimensional cellular structures. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2004;79(4-6): 1027-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-2620-3.
- Ringeisen BR, Kim H, Barron JA, Krizman DB, Chrisey DB, Jackman S, Auyeung RY, Spargo BJ. Laser printing of pluripotent embryonal carcinoma cells. Tissue Eng. 2004;10(3-4):483-91. https://doi.org/10.1089/107632704323061843
- Hopp B, Smausz T, Kresz N, Barna N, Bor Z, Kolozsvari L, Chrisey DB, Szabo A, Nogradi A. Survival and proliferative ability of various living cell types after laser-induced forward transfer. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(11-12):1817-23. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.1817
- Doraiswamy A, Narayan RJ, Lippert T, Urech L, Wokaun A, Nagel M, Hopp B, Dinescu M, Modi R, Auyeung RC, Chrisey DB. Excimer laser forward transfer of mammalian cells using a novel triazene absorbing layer. Appl Surf Sci. 2006;252(13):4743-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.166
- Koch L, Kuhn S, Sorg H, Gruene M, Schlie S, Gaebel R, Polchow B, Reimers K, Stoelting S, Ma N, Vogt PM. Laser printing of skin cells and human stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2009;16(5):847-54. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0397
- Holzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, Van Vlierberghe S, Gu L, Ovsianikov A. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3): 032002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002
- Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT. The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol Adv. 2017; https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006.
- Tirella A, Orsini A, Vozzi G, Ahluwalia A. A phase diagram for microfabrication of geometrically controlled hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication. 2009;1(4):045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/1/4/045002
- Tirella A, Vozzi F, De Maria C, Vozzi G, Sandri T, Sassano D, Cognolato L, Ahluwalia A. Substrate stiffness influences high resolution printing of living cells with an ink-jet system. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;112(1):79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.03.019.
- Chen C, Bang S, Cho Y, Lee S, Lee I, Zhang S, Noh I. Research trends in biomimetic medical materials for tissue engineering: 3D bioprinting, surface modification, nano/micro-technology and clinical aspects in tissue engineering of cartilage and bone. Biomater. Res. 2016;20(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0057-3.
- Pekkanen AM, Mondschein RJ, Williams CB, Long TE. 3D printing polymers with supramolecular functionality for biological applications. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(9):2669-87. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00671
- Xiong JY, Narayanan J, Liu XY, Chong TK, Chen SB, Chung TS. Topology evolution and gelation mechanism of agarose gel. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109(12):5638-43. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp044473u
- Mao B, Divoux T, Snabre P. Impact of saccharides on the drying kinetics of agarose gels measured by in-situ interferometry. Sci Rep. 2017;7 https://doi. org/10.1038/srep41185.
- Zucca P, Fernandez-Lafuente R, Sanjust E. Agarose and its derivatives as supports for enzyme immobilization. Molecules. 2016;21(11):1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111577.
- Garrido T, Etxabide A, Guerrero P, de la Caba K. Characterization of agar/soy protein biocomposite films: effect of agar on the extruded pellets and compression moulded films. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:408-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.089
- Fedorovich NE, De Wijn JR, Verbout AJ, Alblas J, Dhert WJ. Threedimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned constructs for bone tissue printing. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(1):127-33. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.a.2007.0158
- Kreimendahl F, Kopf M, Thiebes AL, Duarte Campos DF, Blaeser A, Schmitz-Rode T, Apel C, Jockenhoevel S, Fischer H. Three-dimensional printing and angiogenesis: tailored agarose-type I collagen blends comprise threedimensional printability and angiogenesis potential for tissue-engineered substitutes. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods. 2017;23(10):604-15. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0234
- Yang X, Lu Z, Wu H, Li W, Zheng L, Zhao J. Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002.
- Gu Q, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Kapsa R, Cook M, Zhou Q, Wallace G, Crook J. Bioprinting 3D functional neural tissue using human neural and induced pluripotent stem cells. InFront. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress doi: 103389/confFBIOE201601.01087.
- Gu Q, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Lozano R, Chen Y, Kapsa RM, Zhou Q, Wallace GG, Crook JM. Functional 3D neural mini-tissues from printed gel-based bioink and human neural stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(12):1429-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600095
- Forget A, Blaeser A, Miessmer F, Kopf M, Campos DF, Voelcker NH, Blencowe A, Fischer H, Shastri VP. Mechanically tunable bioink for 3D bioprinting of human cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(20) https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700255.
- Daly AC, Critchley SE, Rencsok EM, Kelly DJ. A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage. Biofabrication. 2016;8(4):045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045002
- Daly AC, Cunniffe GM, Sathy BN, Jeon O, Alsberg E, Kelly DJ. 3D bioprinting of developmentally inspired templates for whole bone organ engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(18):2353-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600182
- Ozler SB, Bakirci E, Kucukgul C, Koc B. Three-dimensional direct cell bioprinting for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105(8):2530-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33768
- Kulseng B, Skjak-Bræk G, Ryan L, Andersson A, King A, Faxvaag A, Espevik T. Transplantation of alginate microcapsules: generation of antibodies against alginates and encapsulated porcine islet-like cell clusters. Transplantation. 1999;67(7):978-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199904150-00008
- Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BH. Alginate biosynthesis and biotechnological production. In alginates and their biomedical applications 2018 (pp. 1-25). Springer, Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6910-9_1.
- Axpe E, Oyen ML. Applications of alginate-based bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12):1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121976
-
Das D, Zhang S, Noh I. Synthesis and characterizations of alginate-
$\alpha$ -tricalcium phosphate microparticle hybrid film with flexibility and high mechanical property as biomaterials. Biomed Mater. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aa8fa1. - Zhang Y, Yu Y, Chen H, Ozbolat IT. Characterization of printable cellular micro-fluidic channels for tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2013;5(2):025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/025004
- Yu Y, Zhang Y, Martin JA, Ozbolat IT. Evaluation of cell viability and functionality in vessel-like bioprintable cell-laden tubular channels. J Biomech Eng. 2013;135(9):091011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024575
- Gao Q, He Y, Fu JZ, Liu A, Ma L. Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials. 2015;61:203-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.031
- Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, Yue K, Zhu K, Liu W, Pi Q, Byambaa B, Dokmeci MR, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials. 2016;106:58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038
- Christensen K, Xu C, Chai W, Zhang Z, Fu J, Huang Y. Freeform inkjet printing of cellular structures with bifurcations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015; 112(5):1047-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25501
- Shim JH, Lee JS, Kim JY, Cho DW. Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system. J Micromech Microeng. 2012;22(8):085014. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/8/085014
- Jang CH, Ahn SH, Yang GH, Kim GH. A MSCs-laden polycaprolactone/collagen scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. RSC Adv. 2016;6(8):6259-65. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA20627H
- Armstrong JP, Burke M, Carter BM, Davis SA, Perriman AW. 3D bioprinting using a templated porous bioink. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(14):1724-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600022
- Wang X, Tolba E, Schroder HC, Neufurth M, Feng Q, Diehl-Seifert B, Muller WE. Effect of bioglass on growth and biomineralization of SaOS-2 cells in hydrogel after 3D cell bioprinting. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112497
- Ning L, Xu Y, Chen X, Schreyer DJ. Influence of mechanical properties of alginate-based substrates on the performance of Schwann cells in culture. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2016;27(9):898-915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2016.1170415
- Faulkner-Jones A, Fyfe C, Cornelissen DJ, Gardner J, King J, Courtney A, Shu W. Bioprinting of human pluripotent stem cells and their directed differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells for the generation of mini-livers in 3D. Biofabrication. 2015;7(4):044102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/044102
- Zhao Y, Yao R, Ouyang L, Ding H, Zhang T, Zhang K, Cheng S, Sun W. Three-dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro. Biofabrication. 2014;6(3):035001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035001
- Park J, Lee SJ, Chung S, Lee JH, Kim WD, Lee JY, Park SA. Cell-laden 3D bioprinting hydrogel matrix depending on different compositions for soft tissue engineering: characterization and evaluation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2017; 71:678-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.069
- Ahlfeld T, Cidonio G, Kilian D, Duin S, Akkineni AR, Dawson JI, Yang S, Lode A, Oreffo RO, Gelinsky M. Development of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal application. Biofabrication. 2017;9(3):034103. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e96
- Nguyen D, Hagg DA, Forsman A, Ekholm J, Nimkingratana P, Brantsing C, Kalogeropoulos T, Zaunz S, Concaro S, Brittberg M, Lindahl A. Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a nanocelluloselginate bioink. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00690-y
- Kosik-Koziol A, Costantini M, Bolek T, Szoke K, Barbetta A, Brinchmann J, Swieszkowski W. PLA short sub-micron fiber reinforcement of 3D bioprinted alginate constructs for cartilage regeneration. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90d7
- Rodriguez-Pascual F, Slatter DA. Collagen cross-linking: insights on the evolution of metazoan extracellular matrix. Sci Rep. 2016;6
- Ferreira AM, Gentile P, Chiono V, Ciardelli G. Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(9):3191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.014
- van Uden S, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Current strategies for treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: substitution and regeneration possibilities. Biomater. Res. 2017;21(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-017-0106-6
- Wollensak G. Crosslinking treatment of progressive keratoconus: new hope. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(4):356-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.icu.0000233954.86723.25
- Mrochen M. Current status of accelerated corneal cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):428. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.116075
- Mori H, Shimizu K, Hara M. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of collagen gels with high mechanical strength. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(6):3230-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.047
- Smith CM, Stone AL, Parkhill RL, Stewart RL, Simpkins MW, Kachurin AM, Warren WL, Williams SK. Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating viable tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng. 2004;10(9-10):1566-76. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1566
- Stratesteffen H, Kopf M, Kreimendahl F, Blaeser A, Jockenhoevel S, Fischer H. GelMA-collagen blends enable drop-on-demand 3D printablility and promote angiogenesis. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa857c
- Yeo M, Lee JS, Chun W, Kim GH. An innovative collagen-based cell-printing method for obtaining human adipose stem cell-laden structures consisting of core-sheath structures for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2016; 17(4):1365-75. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01764
- Yeo MG, Kim GH. A cell-printing approach for obtaining hASC-laden scaffolds by using a collagen/polyphenol bioink. Biofabrication. 2017;9(2):025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa6997
- Lee J, Yeo M, Kim W, Koo Y, Kim GH. Development of a tannic acid crosslinking process for obtaining 3D porous cell-laden collagen structure. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.105.
- Pimentel R, Ko SK, Caviglia C, Wolff A, Emneus J, Keller SS, Dufva M. Threedimensional fabrication of thick and densely populated soft constructs with complex and actively perfused channel network. Acta Biomater. 2018;65: 174-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.047
- Yoo HS, Lee EA, Yoon JJ, Park TG. Hyaluronic acid modified biodegradable scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26(14):1925-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.021
- Highley CB, Prestwich GD, Burdick JA. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;40:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.008
- Ouyang L, Highley CB, Rodell CB, Sun W, Burdick JA. 3D printing of shearthinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary cross-linking. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(10):1743-51. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00158
- Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, Abbadessa A, Melchels FP, Oner FC, Dhert WJ, Vermonden T, Alblas J. 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0177628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177628.
-
Stichler S, Bock T, Paxton N, Bertlein S, Levato R, Schill V, Smolan W, Malda J, Tessmar J, Blunk T, Groll J. Double printing of hyaluronic acid/poly(glycidol) hybrid hydrogels with poly(
$\varepsilon$ -caprolactone) for MSC chondrogenesis. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8cb7 - Hemshekhar M, Thushara RM, Chandranayaka S, Sherman LS, Kemparaju K, Girish KS. Emerging roles of hyaluronic acid bioscaffolds in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;86:917-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.032
- Sakai S, Ohi H, Hotta T, Kamei H, Taya M. Differentiation potential of human adipose stem cells bioprinted with hyaluronic acid/gelatin-based bioink through microextrusion and visible light-initiated crosslinking. Biopolymers. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.031.
- Law N, Doney B, Glover H, Qin Y, Aman ZM, Sercombe TB, Liew LJ, Dilley RJ, Doyle BJ. Characterisation of hyaluronic acid methylcellulose hydrogels for 3D bioprinting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;77:389-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.031
- Cui X, Boland T. Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials. 2009;30(31):6221-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.056
- Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, Chen X, Chandra P, Mo X, Song L, Atala A, Zhao W. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:154-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.008
- England S, Rajaram A, Schreyer DJ, Chen X. Bioprinted fibrin-factor XIIIhyaluronate hydrogel scaffolds with encapsulated Schwann cells and their in vitro characterization for use in nerve regeneration. Bioprinting. 2017;5:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2016.12.001.
- Lott JR, McAllister JW, Arvidson SA, Bates FS, Lodge TP. Fibrillar structure of methylcellulose hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(8):2484-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400694r
- Kobayashi K, Huang CI, Lodge TP. Thermoreversible gelation of aqueous methylcellulose solutions. Macromolecules. 1999;32(21):7070-7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma990242n
- Thirumala S, Gimble JM, Devireddy RV. Methylcellulose based thermally reversible hydrogel system for tissue engineering applications. Cell. 2013;2(3):460-75. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells2030460
- Wu C, Luo Y, Cuniberti G, Xiao Y, Gelinsky M. Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical and tough mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a controllable pore architecture, excellent mechanical strength and mineralization ability. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(6):2644-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.009
- Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, Martinez Avila H, Hagg D, Gatenholm P. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(5):1489-96. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188
- Avila HM, Schwarz S, Rotter N, Gatenholm P. 3D bioprinting of human chondrocyte-laden nanocellulose hydrogels for patient-specific auricular cartilage regeneration. Bioprinting. 2016;1:22-35.
- Markstedt K, Escalante A, Toriz G, Gatenholm P. Biomimetic inks based on cellulose nanofibrils and cross-linkable xylans for 3D printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(46):40878-86. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b13400
- Sultan S, Siqueira G, Zimmermann T, Mathew AP. 3D printing of nanocellulosic biomaterials for medical applications. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.06.002.
- Floren M, Bonani W, Dharmarajan A, Motta A, Migliaresi C, Tan W. Human mesenchymal stem cells cultured on silk hydrogels with variable stiffness and growth factor differentiate into mature smooth muscle cell phenotype. Acta Biomater. 2016;31:156-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.051
- Das S, Pati F, Choi YJ, Rijal G, Shim JH, Kim SW, Ray AR, Cho DW, Ghosh S. Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:233-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.023
- Rodriguez MJ, Brown J, Giordano J, Lin SJ, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL. Silk based bioinks for soft tissue reconstruction using 3-dimensional (3D) printing with in vitro and in vivo assessments. Biomaterials. 2017;117:105-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.046
- Compaan AM, Christensen K, Huang Y. Inkjet bioprinting of 3D silk fibroin cellular constructs using sacrificial alginate. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3(8): 1519-26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00432.
- Xiong S, Zhang X, Lu P, Wu Y, Wang Q, Sun H, Heng BC, Bunpetch V, Zhang S, Ouyang H. A gelatin-sulfonated silk composite scaffold based on 3D printing technology enhances skin regeneration by stimulating epidermal growth and dermal neovascularization. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4288. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04149-y
- Zheng Z, Wu J, Liu M, Wang H, Li C, Rodriguez MJ, Li G, Wang X, Kaplan DL. 3D bioprinting of self-standing silk-based bioink. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701026.
- DeSimone E, Schacht K, Pellert A, Scheibel T. Recombinant spider silk-based bioinks. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90db.
- Jung JP, Bhuiyan DB, Ogle BM. Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting. Biomater Res. 2016;20(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0074-2.
- Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, Kim SW, Rhie JW, Shim JH, Kim DH, Cho DW. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun. 2014;5
- Jang J, Kim TG, Kim BS, Kim SW, Kwon SM, Cho DW. Tailoring mechanical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink by vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking. Acta Biomater. 2016;33:88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.013
- Ahn G, Min KH, Kim C, Lee JS, Kang D, Won JY, Cho DW, Kim JY, Jin S, Yun WS, Shim JH. Precise stacking of decellularized extracellular matrix based 3D cell-laden constructs by a 3D cell printing system equipped with heating modules. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8624. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09201-5
- Jang J, Park HJ, Kim SW, Kim H, Park JY, Na SJ, Kim HJ, Park MN, Choi SH, Park SH, Kim SW. 3D printed complex tissue construct using stem cell-laden decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for cardiac repair. Biomaterials. 2017;112:264-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.026
- Jakab K, Damon B, Neagu A, Kachurin A, Forgacs G. Three-dimensional tissue constructs built by bioprinting. Biorheology. 2006;43(3, 4):509-13.
- Yu Y, Moncal KK, Li J, Peng W, Rivero I, Martin JA, Ozbolat IT. Threedimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free "tissue strands" as a new bioink. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28714. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28714
- Bakirci E, Toprakhisar B, Zeybek MC, Ince GO, Koc B. Cell sheet based bioink for 3D bioprinting applications. Biofabrication. 2017;9(2):024105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa764f
- Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater. 2011;23(12)
- Guvendiren M, Burdick JA. Engineering synthetic hydrogel microenvironments to instruct stem cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24(5):841-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.009
- Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nature Biotech. 2016;34(3):312-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413
- Wu W, DeConinck A, Lewis JA. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv Mater. 2011;23:H178-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201004625
- Muller M, Becher J, Schnabelrauch M, Zenobi-Wong M. Nanostructured pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2015;7(3): 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035006
- Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Finn MG, Lotz M, D'Lima DD. Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18(11-12):1304-12. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0543
- Hribar KC, Soman P, Warner J, Chung P, Chen S. Light-assisted direct-write of 3D functional biomaterials. Lab Chip. 2014;14(2):268-75. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3LC50634G
- Wust S, Muller R, Hofmann S. 3D bioprinting of complex channels-effects of material, orientation, geometry, and cell embedding. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2015;103(8):2558-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35393
- Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW, Cheung PY, Duan B, Malone E, Wu J, Girardi LN, Bonassar LJ, Lipson H, Chu CC. Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication. 2012;4(3):035005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/3/035005
- Hong S, Sycks D, Chan HF, Lin S, Lopez GP, Guilak F, Leong KW, Zhao X. 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv Mater. 2015;27(27):4035-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501099
- Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE, Burghardt WR, Shah RN. A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Adv Mater. 2015;27(9):1607-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405076
- Ji S, Guvendiren M. Recent advances in bioink design for 3D bioprinting of Ttissues and organs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023.
- Mozetic P, Maria Giannitelli S, Gori M, Trombetta M, Rainer A. Engineering muscle cell alignment through 3D bioprinting. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36117.
- Kucukgul C, Ozler SB, Inci I, Karakas E, Irmak S, Gozuacik D, Taralp A, Koc B. 3D bioprinting of biomimetic aortic vascular constructs with self-supporting cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112(4):811-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25493.
- Kim JE, Kim SH, Jung Y. Current status of three-dimensional printing inks for soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13(6):636-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-016-0125-8
- Jang J, Park JY, Gao G, Cho DW. Biomaterials-based 3D cell printing for next-generation therapeutics and diagnostics. Biomaterials. 2018;156:88-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.030
- Duarte Campos DF, Blaeser A, Korsten A, Neuss S, Jakel J, Vogt M, Fischer H. The stiffness and structure of three-dimensional printed hydrogels direct the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells toward adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;21(3-4):740-56.
- Lee W, Lee V, Polio S, Keegan P, Lee JH, Fischer K, Park JK, Yoo SS. Ondemand three-dimensional freeform fabrication of multi-layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010;105(6):1178-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22613
- Schiele NR, Chrisey DB, Corr DT. Gelatin-based laser direct-write technique for the precise spatial patterning of cells. Tissue Eng Part A: Methods. 2010; 17(3):289-98.
- Duan B, Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Butcher JT. 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101((5):1255-64.
- Xu T, Gregory CA, Molnar P, Cui X, Jalota S, Bhaduri SB, Boland T. Viability and electrophysiology of neural cell structures generated by the inkjet printing method. Biomaterials. 2006;27(19):3580-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.048
- Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, Cornelissen M, Dubruel P. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials. 2014;35(1):49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078
- Levato R, Webb WR, Otto IA, Mensinga A, Zhang Y, van Rijen M, van Weeren R, Khan IM, Malda J. The bio in the ink: cartilage regeneration with bioprintable hydrogels and articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells. Acta Biomater. 2017;61:41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.005
- Mouser VH, Melchels FP, Visser J, Dhert WJ, Gawlitta D, Malda J. Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3):035003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035003
- Brown GC, Lim KS, Farrugia BL, Hooper GJ, Woodfield TB. Covalent incorporation of heparin improves chondrogenesis in photocurable gelatinmethacryloyl hydrogels. Macromol Biosci. 2017;17(12) https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201700158.
Cited by
- Click Chemistry-Based Injectable Hydrogels and Bioprinting Inks for Tissue Engineering Applications vol.15, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0152-8
- Mimicking Epithelial Tissues in Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Models vol.6, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00197
- Vascularization in 3D printed tissues: emerging technologies to overcome longstanding obstacles vol.2, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3934/celltissue.2018.3.163
- CRISPR engineering cardiometabolic disease models using human iPSC vol.2, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3934/celltissue.2018.3.185
- Bioprinting of Stem Cells: Interplay of Bioprinting Process, Bioinks, and Stem Cell Properties vol.4, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00399
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cartilage by the Use of Stem Cells: A Strategy to Improve Regeneration vol.11, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091749
- Effect of the pore size in a 3D bioprinted gelatin scaffold on fibroblast proliferation vol.67, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.07.013
- Effect of the pore size in a 3D bioprinted gelatin scaffold on fibroblast proliferation vol.67, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.07.013
- Tissue engineering the cancer microenvironment—challenges and opportunities vol.10, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-018-0466-8
- Cardiovascular tissue bioprinting: Physical and chemical processes vol.5, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5048807
- Stabilization strategies in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering vol.5, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055659
- Recent advances in stem cell therapeutics and tissue engineering strategies vol.22, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0148-4
- 3D Printing Applied to Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts vol.8, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122631
- Characterization and printability of Sodium alginate -Gelatin hydrogel for bioprinting NSCLC co-culture vol.9, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55034-9
- Evaluation of Rheological Properties and Cytotoxicity of Bioinks vol.4, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2019.40
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Organotypic and Microphysiological Liver Models for Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury vol.10, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01093
- Emerging polymeric materials in additive manufacturing for use in biomedical applications vol.6, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2019.1.1
- Engineering Precision Medicine vol.6, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201801039
- Gelatin‐polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: Towards natural therapeutics vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10124
- Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs vol.1, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100008
- Direct Experimental Evidence of Biomimetic Surfaces with Chemical Modifications Interfering with Adhesive Protein Adsorption vol.24, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010027
- 3D Printing of Neural Tissues Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using a Fibrin-Based Bioink vol.5, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01235
- The Adoption of Three-Dimensional Additive Manufacturing from Biomedical Material Design to 3D Organ Printing vol.9, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9040811
- 3D Printing of Silk Fibroin for Biomedical Applications vol.12, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12030504
- Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review vol.30, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6234-x
- Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging technique for biological model fabrication vol.6, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5059393
- Tissue/organ-derived bioink formulation for 3D bioprinting vol.3, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2018-0024
- Recent Strategies in Extrusion-Based Three-Dimensional Cell Printing toward Organ Biofabrication vol.5, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00691
- The Evolution of Tissue Engineered Vascular Graft Technologies: From Preclinical Trials to Advancing Patient Care vol.9, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9071274
- Synthetic Biodegradable Aliphatic Polyester Nanocomposites Reinforced with Nanohydroxyapatite and/or Graphene Oxide for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications vol.9, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040590
- Synthetic Biology for Multiscale Designed Biomimetic Assemblies: From Designed Self-Assembling Biopolymers to Bacterial Bioprinting vol.58, pp.16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00922
- 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay vol.11, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6
- 3D bioprinting models of neural tissues: The current state of the field and future directions vol.150, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.06.007
- iPSC Bioprinting: Where are We at? vol.12, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12152453
- Engineering Functional Cardiac Tissues for Regenerative Medicine Applications vol.21, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1178-9
- Bioprinting Approaches to Engineering Vascularized 3D Cardiac Tissues vol.21, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1179-8
- Sodium Alginate/Gelatine Hydrogels for Direct Bioprinting-The Effect of Composition Selection and Applied Solvents on the Bioink Properties vol.12, pp.17, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172669
- An Overview of Hydrogel-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting of Soft Tissues vol.99, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00129-5
- Nanocellulose-Based Inks-Effect of Alginate Content on the Water Absorption of 3D Printed Constructs vol.6, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030065
- 3D Printing of Functional Microalgal Silk Structures for Environmental Applications vol.5, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00554
- Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering vol.11, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e
- Tumor Cells Develop Defined Cellular Phenotypes After 3D-Bioprinting in Different Bioinks vol.8, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101295
- Proof of concept, design, and manufacture via 3‐D printing of a mesh with bactericidal capacity: Behaviour in vitro and in vivo vol.13, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2944
- Review of Advanced Hydrogel-Based Cell Encapsulation Systems for Insulin Delivery in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus vol.11, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11110597
- Recent advances in the development of nature-derived photocrosslinkable biomaterials for 3D printing in tissue engineering vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-019-0168-8
- Skin bioprinting: the future of burn wound reconstruction? vol.7, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0142-7
- Cell-Electrospinning and Its Application for Tissue Engineering vol.20, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246208
- Graphene oxide/alginate composites as novel bioinks for three-dimensional mesenchymal stem cell printing and bone regeneration applications vol.11, pp.48, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr07643c
- Dendritic Hydrogel Bioink for 3D Printing of Bacterial Microhabitat vol.2, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00866
- Three-Dimensional Printing: A Catalyst for a Changing Orthopaedic Landscape vol.8, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.19.00076
- Hyaluronic acid as a bioactive component for bone tissue regeneration: Fabrication, modification, properties, and biological functions vol.9, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2020-0084
- 3D Bioprinting Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neural Tissues Using a Novel Fibrin Bioink Containing Drug Releasing Microspheres vol.8, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00057
- 3D Printed Biomimetic Rabbit Airway Simulation Model for Nasotracheal Intubation Training vol.7, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.587524
- 3D‐Printed Sugar Scaffold for High‐Precision and Highly Sensitive Active and Passive Wearable Sensors vol.7, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902521
- Cartilage and bone tissue engineering using adipose stromal/stem cells spheroids as building blocks vol.12, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v12.i2.110
- The Potential Impact and Timeline of Engineering on Congenital Interventions vol.41, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02335-w
- Recent Applications of Three Dimensional Printing in Cardiovascular Medicine vol.9, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030742
- 3D Printing for the Clinic: Examining Contemporary Polymeric Biomaterials and Their Clinical Utility vol.21, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01539
- Addressing present pitfalls in 3D printing for tissue engineering to enhance future potential vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5127860
- Sterilization Methods and Their Influence on Physicochemical Properties and Bioprinting of Alginate as a Bioink Component vol.5, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04096
- Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability vol.12, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d
- Editorial for the Special Issue on 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine vol.11, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11040366
- Materials and technical innovations in 3D printing in biomedical applications vol.8, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00034e
- 3D Bioprinting for Vascularized Tissue-Engineered Bone Fabrication vol.13, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102278
- 3D Extracellular Matrix Mimics: Fundamental Concepts and Role of Materials Chemistry to Influence Stem Cell Fate vol.21, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00045
- Fabrication of Aligned Biomimetic Gellan Gum-Chitosan Microstructures through 3D Printed Microfluidic Channels and Multiple In Situ Cross-Linking Mechanisms vol.6, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00260
- A universal self‐eroding sacrificial bioink that enables bioprinting at room temperature vol.31, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4892
- Emerging Biomimetic Materials for Studying Tumor and Immune Cell Behavior vol.48, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02384-0
- Evaluation of a cell-based osteogenic formulation compliant with good manufacturing practice for use in tissue engineering vol.47, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05588-z
- 3D Printing Approach in Dentistry: The Future for Personalized Oral Soft Tissue Regeneration vol.9, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072238
- Hyaluronic acid as a bioink for extrusion-based 3D printing vol.12, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8752
- Improvement of cell deposition by self-absorbent capability of freeze-dried 3D-bioprinted scaffolds derived from cellulose material-alginate hydrogels vol.6, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ab8fc6
- Peptide Chitosan/Dextran Core/Shell Vascularized 3D Constructs for Wound Healing vol.12, pp.29, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c07212
- 허혈성 심혈관 질환의 치료제로서 혈관내피전구세포(EPC)의 가능성에 대한 고찰 vol.30, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2020.30.7.651
- Synthetic Polymers for Organ 3D Printing vol.12, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081765
- Natural 3D-Printed Bioinks for Skin Regeneration and Wound Healing: A Systematic Review vol.12, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081782
- Biological responses to physicochemical properties of biomaterial surface vol.49, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00103a
- Advances in Extrusion 3D Bioprinting: A Focus on Multicomponent Hydrogel‐Based Bioinks vol.9, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901648
- Dynamic Bioinks to Advance Bioprinting vol.9, pp.15, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901798
- From cells-on-a-chip to organs-on-a-chip: scaffolding materials for 3D cell culture in microfluidics vol.8, pp.31, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00718h
- Granular hydrogels for 3D bioprinting applications vol.1, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/viw.20200060
- Recent Trends in Three-Dimensional Bioinks Based on Alginate for Biomedical Applications vol.13, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183980
- Hybrid Spider Silk with Inorganic Nanomaterials vol.10, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091853
- Reduced Supply in the Organ Donor Market and How 3D Printing Can Address This Shortage: A Critical Inquiry into the Collateral Effects of Driverless Cars vol.10, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186400
- 3D Printing of Cytocompatible Gelatin‐Cellulose‐Alginate Blend Hydrogels vol.20, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202000106
- Self-crosslinking hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel enhances multilayered 3D-printed construct shape integrity and mechanical stability for soft tissue engineering vol.12, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba2f7
- Preliminary engineering for in situ in vivo bioprinting: a novel micro bioprinting platform for in situ in vivo bioprinting at a gastric wound site vol.12, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba4ff
- Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks vol.120, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00015
- Bioprinting: From Tissue and Organ Development to in Vitro Models vol.120, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00789
- Ultrasonic Microplotting of Microgel Bioinks vol.12, pp.42, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c15056
- Background-free fibre optic Brillouin probe for remote mapping of micromechanics vol.11, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.404535
- An Alkaline Based Method for Generating Crystalline, Strong, and Shape Memory Polyvinyl Alcohol Biomaterials vol.7, pp.21, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902740
- An insight into cell-laden 3D-printed constructs for bone tissue engineering vol.8, pp.43, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb02019b
- Designing Decellularized Extracellular Matrix‐Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting vol.9, pp.24, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000734
- Three‐dimensional printing of extracellular matrix (ECM)‐mimicking scaffolds: A critical review of the current ECM materials vol.108, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36981
- 3D bioprinting for reconstituting the cancer microenvironment vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-020-0121-2
- The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes vol.26, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0210
- Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting Technology and Its Applications for Tissue Engineering vol.12, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122958
- Hydrogel‐Based 3D Bioprinting for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering vol.15, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202000095
- 3D bioprinting applications for the printing of skin: A brief study vol.2, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100123
- Exploring the possibilities of FDM filaments comprising natural fiber-reinforced biocomposites for additive manufacturing vol.8, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2021032
- Nano-biomaterials for designing functional bioinks towards complex tissue and organ regeneration in 3D bioprinting vol.37, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101639
- Challenges and solutions for fabrication of three-dimensional cocultures of neural cell-loaded biomimetic constructs vol.16, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0000700
- Candidate Bioinks for Extrusion 3D Bioprinting-A Systematic Review of the Literature vol.9, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.616753
- Additive Manufacturing of Biopolymers for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: An Overview, Potential Applications, Advancements, and Trends vol.2021, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4907027
- A Review of Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting With an Eye on Future Regenerative Therapies in Veterinary Medicine vol.7, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.584193
- Drug‐loading three‐dimensional scaffolds based on hydroxyapatite‐sodium alginate for bone regeneration vol.109, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37018
- Natural Biomaterials and Their Use as Bioinks for Printing Tissues vol.8, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8020027
- Advancement of Scaffold-Based 3D Cellular Models in Cancer Tissue Engineering: An Update vol.11, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.733652
- Stimuli-responsive engineered living materials vol.17, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0sm01905d
- Bioresorbable Polymers: Advanced Materials and 4D Printing for Tissue Engineering vol.13, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040563
- A Review of Vat Photopolymerization Technology: Materials, Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends of 3D Printing vol.13, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040598
- Building three-dimensional lung models for studying pharmacokinetics of inhaled drugs vol.170, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.09.008
- In vitro characterization of xeno-free clinically relevant human collagen and its applicability in cell-laden 3D bioprinting vol.35, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328220959162
- Polymeric Bioinks for 3D Hepatic Printing vol.3, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry3010014
- Modeling the Mechanobiology of Cancer Cell Migration Using 3D Biomimetic Hydrogels vol.7, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7010017
- Current Insights into 3D Bioprinting: An Advanced Approach for Eye Tissue Regeneration vol.13, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030308
- Effects of Lyophilization on the Release Profiles of 3D Printed Delivery Systems Fabricated with Carboxymethyl Cellulose Hydrogel vol.13, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050749
- Cell-Laden Nanocellulose/Chitosan-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Enhanced Osteogenic Cell Differentiation vol.4, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01108
- Development of a Biomimetic Hydrogel Based on Predifferentiated Mesenchymal Stem‐Cell‐Derived ECM for Cartilage Tissue Engineering vol.10, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001847
- The Use of 3D Printers in Medical Education with a Focus on Bone Pathology vol.31, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01222-0
- 3D Bioprinting of Functional Skin Substitutes: From Current Achievements to Future Goals vol.14, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14040362
- Emerging Biofabrication Techniques: A Review on Natural Polymers for Biomedical Applications vol.13, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081209
- Protein-Based 3D Biofabrication of Biomaterials vol.8, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8040048
- 3D Printing for Soft Tissue Regeneration and Applications in Medicine vol.9, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040336
- Regulation of Cell Types Within Testicular Organoids vol.162, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqab033
- Synthesis and characterization of chemically crosslinked gelatin and chitosan to produce hydrogels for biomedical applications vol.32, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5257
- Collagen in Wound Healing vol.8, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8050063
- Bioinks-materials used in printing cells in designed 3D forms vol.32, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2021.1892470
- Polymeric biomaterials for 3D printing in medicine: An overview vol.2, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100011
- 3D printing in biomedical engineering: Processes, materials, and applications vol.8, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0024177
- Chitooligosaccharides and their structural-functional effect on hydrogels: A review vol.261, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117882
- Testing the methodology for evaluating the accuracy of the 3d printing vol.1942, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1942/1/012057
- 3D Bioprinting and Translation of Beta Cell Replacement Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes vol.27, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0192
- Synthesis and characterization of photopolymerizable hydrogels based on poly (ethylene glycol) for biomedical applications vol.138, pp.21, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50489
- Synthesis and characterization of photopolymerizable hydrogels based on poly (ethylene glycol) for biomedical applications vol.138, pp.21, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50489
- In Situ 3D Printing: Opportunities with Silk Inks vol.39, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.11.003
- Progress in cardiovascular bioprinting vol.45, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13913
- Recent advancements in the bioprinting of vascular grafts vol.13, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac0963
- Ultrashort Peptide Bioinks Support Automated Printing of Large-Scale Constructs Assuring Long-Term Survival of Printed Tissue Constructs vol.21, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04426
- Chemo-mechanical modelling of swelling and crosslinking reaction kinetics in alginate hydrogels: A novel theory and its numerical implementation vol.153, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104476
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Bioactive Factors, and Scaffolds in Bone Repair: From Research Perspectives to Clinical Practice vol.10, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10081925
- Tissue-Specific Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioinks for Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration and Modeling Using 3D Bioprinting Technology vol.22, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157837
- Review of Low-Cost 3D Bioprinters: State of the Market and Observed Future Trends vol.26, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/24726303211020297
- Three-Dimensional Printing Using a Maize Protein: Zein-Based Inks in Biomedical Applications vol.7, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00544
- 3D printing silk-gelatin-propanediol scaffold with enhanced osteogenesis properties through p-Smad1/5/8 activated Runx2 pathway vol.32, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2021.1912977
- Hydrogel prepared by 3D printing technology and its applications in the medical field vol.44, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2021.100498
- Biofabrication Strategies for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Evolution towards Clinical Applications vol.8, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8090123
- Adenosine-treated bioprinted muscle constructs prolong cell survival and improve tissue formation vol.4, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00128-5
- Composite Inks for Extrusion Printing of Biological and Biomedical Constructs vol.7, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01158
- Trends in Double Networks as Bioprintable and Injectable Hydrogel Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration vol.7, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01749
- Integrated 3D Printing-Based Framework-A Strategy to Fabricate Tubular Structures with Mechanocompromised Hydrogels vol.4, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00644
- Exploiting the role of nanoparticles for use in hydrogel-based bioprinting applications: concept, design, and recent advances vol.9, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1bm00605c
- A 3D Bioprinted In Vitro Model of Pulmonary Artery Atresia to Evaluate Endothelial Cell Response to Microenvironment vol.10, pp.20, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100968
- Translational Application of 3D Bioprinting for Cartilage Tissue Engineering vol.8, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8100144
- Development of photo-crosslinkable platelet lysate-based hydrogels for 3D printing and tissue engineering vol.13, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac1993
- Preparation and characterization of a novel polysialic acid/gelatin composite hydrogels cross-linked by tannic acid to improve wound healing after cesarean section dressing vol.32, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2021.1950961
- The effect of borate bioactive glass on the printability of methylcellulose-manuka honey hydrogels vol.36, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00256-9
- An overview on the advantages and limitations of 3D printing of microneedles vol.26, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2021.1965163
- 3D Printing of Bioinspired Alginate‐Albumin Based Instant Gel Ink with Electroconductivity and Its Expansion to Direct Four‐Axis Printing of Hollow Porous Tubular Constructs without Suppor vol.31, pp.45, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202104441
- Bioprinting Au Natural: The Biologics of Bioinks vol.11, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111593
- A Novel Additive Manufacturing Method of Cellulose Gel vol.14, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226988
- Biomimicked hierarchical 2D and 3D structures from natural templates: applications in cell biology vol.16, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ac21a7
- Intrinsic Field-Induced Nanoparticle Assembly in Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Polymeric Composites vol.13, pp.44, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12763
- The promising rise of bioprinting in revolutionalizing medical science: Advances and possibilities vol.18, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2021.05.006
- Positive-charge tuned gelatin hydrogel-siSPARC injectable for siRNA anti-scarring therapy in post glaucoma filtration surgery vol.11, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80542-4
- Elastin-like Polypeptide-Based Bioink: A Promising Alternative for 3D Bioprinting vol.22, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00861
- Nanocomposite Conductive Bioinks Based on Low-Concentration GelMA and MXene Nanosheets/Gold Nanoparticles Providing Enhanced Printability of Functional Skeletal Muscle Tissues vol.7, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01193
- Advances in Photocrosslinkable Materials for 3D Bioprinting vol.24, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202100663
- Tricomposite gelatin-carboxymethylcellulose-alginate bioink for direct and indirect 3D printing of human knee meniscal scaffold vol.195, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.184
- Printable gelatin, alginate and boron nitride nanotubes hydrogel-based ink for 3D bioprinting and tissue engineering applications vol.213, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110362