Biomaterials Research (생체재료학회지)

Korean Society for Biomaterials (한국생체재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing

  • Gopinathan, Janarthanan (Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology (Seoul Tech)) ;
  • Noh, Insup (Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology (Seoul Tech))
  • Received : 2018.01.02
  • Accepted : 2018.03.21
  • Published : 2018.06.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The worldwide demand for the organ replacement or tissue regeneration is increasing steadily. The advancements in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have made it possible to regenerate such damaged organs or tissues into functional organ or tissue with the help of 3D bioprinting. The main component of the 3D bioprinting is the bioink, which is crucial for the development of functional organs or tissue structures. The bioinks used in 3D printing technology require so many properties which are vital and need to be considered during the selection. Combination of different methods and enhancements in properties are required to develop more successful bioinks for the 3D printing of organs or tissue structures. Main body: This review consists of the recent state-of-art of polymer-based bioinks used in 3D printing for applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The subsection projects the basic requirements for the selection of successful bioinks for 3D printing and developing 3D tissues or organ structures using combinations of bioinks such as cells, biomedical polymers and biosignals. Different bioink materials and their properties related to the biocompatibility, printability, mechanical properties, which are recently reported for 3D printing are discussed in detail. Conclusion: Many bioinks formulations have been reported from cell-biomaterials based bioinks to cell-based bioinks such as cell aggregates and tissue spheroids for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Interestingly, more tunable bioinks, which are biocompatible for live cells, printable and mechanically stable after printing are emerging with the help of functional polymeric biomaterials, their modifications and blending of cells and hydrogels. These approaches show the immense potential of these bioinks to produce more complex tissue/organ structures using 3D bioprinting in the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : SeoulTech (Seoul National University of Science and Technology)

References

  1. Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotech. 2014;32(8):773-85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958.
  2. Gu BK, Choi DJ, Park SJ, Kim MS, Kang CM, Kim CH. 3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications. Biomater. Res. 2016;20(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0058-2.
  3. Ahn HJ, Khalmuratova R, Park SA, Chung EJ, Shin HW, Kwon SK. Serial analysis of tracheal restenosis after 3D-printed scaffold implantation: recruited inflammatory cells and associated tissue changes. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 14(5):631-9.
  4. Kaushik SN, Kim B, Walma A, Choi SC, Wu H, Mao JJ, Jun HW, Cheon K. Biomimetic microenvironments for regenerative endodontics. Biomater Res. 2016;20:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0061-7
  5. Jakus AE, Rutz AL, Shah RM. Advancing the field of 3D biomaterial printing. Biomed Mater. 2016;11:014102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/014102
  6. Shafiee A, Atala A. Printing technologies for medical applications. Trends Mol Med. 2016;22(3):254-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2016.01.003.
  7. Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, Duocastella M, Pippenger B, Bellance S, Bareille R, Remy M, Bordenave L, Amedee J, Guillemot F. Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials. 2010;31(28):7250-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055.
  8. Guvendiren M, Molde J, Soares RM, Kohn J. Designing biomaterials for 3D printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(10):1679-93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121.
  9. Ozbolat IT, Peng W, Ozbolat V. Application areas of 3D bioprinting. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21(8):1257-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.006.
  10. Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I. A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: past, present and future. Biomaterials. 2016;102:20-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
  11. Nakamura M, Kobayashi A, Takagi F, Watanabe A, Hiruma Y, Ohuchi K, Iwasaki Y, Horie M, Morita I, Takatani S. Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed seeding of individual living cells. Tissue Eng. 2005; 11(11-12):1658-66. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.1658
  12. Wilson WC, Boland T. Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers. Anat Rec Part A. 2003;272(2):491-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.10057.
  13. Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, Forgacs G, Markwald RR. Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21(4):157-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00033-7
  14. Morris VB, Nimbalkar S, Younesi M, McClellan P, Akkus O. Mechanical properties, cytocompatibility and manufacturability of chitosan: PEGDA hybridgel scaffolds by stereolithography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(1):286-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1643-1
  15. Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, Samanipour R, Ghosh S, Kim K. A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication. 2015;7(4):045009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009
  16. Elomaa L, Pan CC, Shanjani Y, Malkovskiy A, Seppala JV, Yang Y. Threedimensional fabrication of cell-laden biodegradable poly (ethylene glycolco-depsipeptide) hydrogels by visible light stereolithography. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3(42):8348-58. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB01468A
  17. Barron JA, Spargo BJ, Ringeisen BR. Biological laser printing of three dimensional cellular structures. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2004;79(4-6): 1027-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-2620-3.
  18. Ringeisen BR, Kim H, Barron JA, Krizman DB, Chrisey DB, Jackman S, Auyeung RY, Spargo BJ. Laser printing of pluripotent embryonal carcinoma cells. Tissue Eng. 2004;10(3-4):483-91. https://doi.org/10.1089/107632704323061843
  19. Hopp B, Smausz T, Kresz N, Barna N, Bor Z, Kolozsvari L, Chrisey DB, Szabo A, Nogradi A. Survival and proliferative ability of various living cell types after laser-induced forward transfer. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(11-12):1817-23. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.1817
  20. Doraiswamy A, Narayan RJ, Lippert T, Urech L, Wokaun A, Nagel M, Hopp B, Dinescu M, Modi R, Auyeung RC, Chrisey DB. Excimer laser forward transfer of mammalian cells using a novel triazene absorbing layer. Appl Surf Sci. 2006;252(13):4743-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.166
  21. Koch L, Kuhn S, Sorg H, Gruene M, Schlie S, Gaebel R, Polchow B, Reimers K, Stoelting S, Ma N, Vogt PM. Laser printing of skin cells and human stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2009;16(5):847-54. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0397
  22. Holzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, Van Vlierberghe S, Gu L, Ovsianikov A. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3): 032002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002
  23. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT. The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol Adv. 2017; https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006.
  24. Tirella A, Orsini A, Vozzi G, Ahluwalia A. A phase diagram for microfabrication of geometrically controlled hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication. 2009;1(4):045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/1/4/045002
  25. Tirella A, Vozzi F, De Maria C, Vozzi G, Sandri T, Sassano D, Cognolato L, Ahluwalia A. Substrate stiffness influences high resolution printing of living cells with an ink-jet system. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;112(1):79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.03.019.
  26. Chen C, Bang S, Cho Y, Lee S, Lee I, Zhang S, Noh I. Research trends in biomimetic medical materials for tissue engineering: 3D bioprinting, surface modification, nano/micro-technology and clinical aspects in tissue engineering of cartilage and bone. Biomater. Res. 2016;20(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0057-3.
  27. Pekkanen AM, Mondschein RJ, Williams CB, Long TE. 3D printing polymers with supramolecular functionality for biological applications. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(9):2669-87. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00671
  28. Xiong JY, Narayanan J, Liu XY, Chong TK, Chen SB, Chung TS. Topology evolution and gelation mechanism of agarose gel. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109(12):5638-43. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp044473u
  29. Mao B, Divoux T, Snabre P. Impact of saccharides on the drying kinetics of agarose gels measured by in-situ interferometry. Sci Rep. 2017;7 https://doi. org/10.1038/srep41185.
  30. Zucca P, Fernandez-Lafuente R, Sanjust E. Agarose and its derivatives as supports for enzyme immobilization. Molecules. 2016;21(11):1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111577.
  31. Garrido T, Etxabide A, Guerrero P, de la Caba K. Characterization of agar/soy protein biocomposite films: effect of agar on the extruded pellets and compression moulded films. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:408-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.089
  32. Fedorovich NE, De Wijn JR, Verbout AJ, Alblas J, Dhert WJ. Threedimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned constructs for bone tissue printing. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(1):127-33. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.a.2007.0158
  33. Kreimendahl F, Kopf M, Thiebes AL, Duarte Campos DF, Blaeser A, Schmitz-Rode T, Apel C, Jockenhoevel S, Fischer H. Three-dimensional printing and angiogenesis: tailored agarose-type I collagen blends comprise threedimensional printability and angiogenesis potential for tissue-engineered substitutes. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods. 2017;23(10):604-15. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0234
  34. Yang X, Lu Z, Wu H, Li W, Zheng L, Zhao J. Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002.
  35. Gu Q, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Kapsa R, Cook M, Zhou Q, Wallace G, Crook J. Bioprinting 3D functional neural tissue using human neural and induced pluripotent stem cells. InFront. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress doi: 103389/confFBIOE201601.01087.
  36. Gu Q, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Lozano R, Chen Y, Kapsa RM, Zhou Q, Wallace GG, Crook JM. Functional 3D neural mini-tissues from printed gel-based bioink and human neural stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(12):1429-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600095
  37. Forget A, Blaeser A, Miessmer F, Kopf M, Campos DF, Voelcker NH, Blencowe A, Fischer H, Shastri VP. Mechanically tunable bioink for 3D bioprinting of human cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(20) https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700255.
  38. Daly AC, Critchley SE, Rencsok EM, Kelly DJ. A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage. Biofabrication. 2016;8(4):045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045002
  39. Daly AC, Cunniffe GM, Sathy BN, Jeon O, Alsberg E, Kelly DJ. 3D bioprinting of developmentally inspired templates for whole bone organ engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(18):2353-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600182
  40. Ozler SB, Bakirci E, Kucukgul C, Koc B. Three-dimensional direct cell bioprinting for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105(8):2530-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33768
  41. Kulseng B, Skjak-Bræk G, Ryan L, Andersson A, King A, Faxvaag A, Espevik T. Transplantation of alginate microcapsules: generation of antibodies against alginates and encapsulated porcine islet-like cell clusters. Transplantation. 1999;67(7):978-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199904150-00008
  42. Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BH. Alginate biosynthesis and biotechnological production. In alginates and their biomedical applications 2018 (pp. 1-25). Springer, Singapore. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6910-9_1.
  43. Axpe E, Oyen ML. Applications of alginate-based bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12):1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121976
  44. Das D, Zhang S, Noh I. Synthesis and characterizations of alginate-$\alpha$-tricalcium phosphate microparticle hybrid film with flexibility and high mechanical property as biomaterials. Biomed Mater. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aa8fa1.
  45. Zhang Y, Yu Y, Chen H, Ozbolat IT. Characterization of printable cellular micro-fluidic channels for tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2013;5(2):025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/025004
  46. Yu Y, Zhang Y, Martin JA, Ozbolat IT. Evaluation of cell viability and functionality in vessel-like bioprintable cell-laden tubular channels. J Biomech Eng. 2013;135(9):091011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024575
  47. Gao Q, He Y, Fu JZ, Liu A, Ma L. Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials. 2015;61:203-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.031
  48. Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, Yue K, Zhu K, Liu W, Pi Q, Byambaa B, Dokmeci MR, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials. 2016;106:58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038
  49. Christensen K, Xu C, Chai W, Zhang Z, Fu J, Huang Y. Freeform inkjet printing of cellular structures with bifurcations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015; 112(5):1047-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25501
  50. Shim JH, Lee JS, Kim JY, Cho DW. Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system. J Micromech Microeng. 2012;22(8):085014. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/8/085014
  51. Jang CH, Ahn SH, Yang GH, Kim GH. A MSCs-laden polycaprolactone/collagen scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. RSC Adv. 2016;6(8):6259-65. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA20627H
  52. Armstrong JP, Burke M, Carter BM, Davis SA, Perriman AW. 3D bioprinting using a templated porous bioink. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(14):1724-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600022
  53. Wang X, Tolba E, Schroder HC, Neufurth M, Feng Q, Diehl-Seifert B, Muller WE. Effect of bioglass on growth and biomineralization of SaOS-2 cells in hydrogel after 3D cell bioprinting. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112497
  54. Ning L, Xu Y, Chen X, Schreyer DJ. Influence of mechanical properties of alginate-based substrates on the performance of Schwann cells in culture. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2016;27(9):898-915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2016.1170415
  55. Faulkner-Jones A, Fyfe C, Cornelissen DJ, Gardner J, King J, Courtney A, Shu W. Bioprinting of human pluripotent stem cells and their directed differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells for the generation of mini-livers in 3D. Biofabrication. 2015;7(4):044102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/044102
  56. Zhao Y, Yao R, Ouyang L, Ding H, Zhang T, Zhang K, Cheng S, Sun W. Three-dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro. Biofabrication. 2014;6(3):035001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035001
  57. Park J, Lee SJ, Chung S, Lee JH, Kim WD, Lee JY, Park SA. Cell-laden 3D bioprinting hydrogel matrix depending on different compositions for soft tissue engineering: characterization and evaluation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2017; 71:678-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.069
  58. Ahlfeld T, Cidonio G, Kilian D, Duin S, Akkineni AR, Dawson JI, Yang S, Lode A, Oreffo RO, Gelinsky M. Development of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal application. Biofabrication. 2017;9(3):034103. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e96
  59. Nguyen D, Hagg DA, Forsman A, Ekholm J, Nimkingratana P, Brantsing C, Kalogeropoulos T, Zaunz S, Concaro S, Brittberg M, Lindahl A. Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a nanocelluloselginate bioink. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00690-y
  60. Kosik-Koziol A, Costantini M, Bolek T, Szoke K, Barbetta A, Brinchmann J, Swieszkowski W. PLA short sub-micron fiber reinforcement of 3D bioprinted alginate constructs for cartilage regeneration. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90d7
  61. Rodriguez-Pascual F, Slatter DA. Collagen cross-linking: insights on the evolution of metazoan extracellular matrix. Sci Rep. 2016;6
  62. Ferreira AM, Gentile P, Chiono V, Ciardelli G. Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(9):3191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.014
  63. van Uden S, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Current strategies for treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: substitution and regeneration possibilities. Biomater. Res. 2017;21(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-017-0106-6
  64. Wollensak G. Crosslinking treatment of progressive keratoconus: new hope. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(4):356-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.icu.0000233954.86723.25
  65. Mrochen M. Current status of accelerated corneal cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):428. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.116075
  66. Mori H, Shimizu K, Hara M. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of collagen gels with high mechanical strength. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(6):3230-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.047
  67. Smith CM, Stone AL, Parkhill RL, Stewart RL, Simpkins MW, Kachurin AM, Warren WL, Williams SK. Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating viable tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng. 2004;10(9-10):1566-76. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1566
  68. Stratesteffen H, Kopf M, Kreimendahl F, Blaeser A, Jockenhoevel S, Fischer H. GelMA-collagen blends enable drop-on-demand 3D printablility and promote angiogenesis. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa857c
  69. Yeo M, Lee JS, Chun W, Kim GH. An innovative collagen-based cell-printing method for obtaining human adipose stem cell-laden structures consisting of core-sheath structures for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2016; 17(4):1365-75. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01764
  70. Yeo MG, Kim GH. A cell-printing approach for obtaining hASC-laden scaffolds by using a collagen/polyphenol bioink. Biofabrication. 2017;9(2):025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa6997
  71. Lee J, Yeo M, Kim W, Koo Y, Kim GH. Development of a tannic acid crosslinking process for obtaining 3D porous cell-laden collagen structure. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.105.
  72. Pimentel R, Ko SK, Caviglia C, Wolff A, Emneus J, Keller SS, Dufva M. Threedimensional fabrication of thick and densely populated soft constructs with complex and actively perfused channel network. Acta Biomater. 2018;65: 174-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.047
  73. Yoo HS, Lee EA, Yoon JJ, Park TG. Hyaluronic acid modified biodegradable scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26(14):1925-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.021
  74. Highley CB, Prestwich GD, Burdick JA. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;40:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.008
  75. Ouyang L, Highley CB, Rodell CB, Sun W, Burdick JA. 3D printing of shearthinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary cross-linking. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(10):1743-51. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00158
  76. Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, Abbadessa A, Melchels FP, Oner FC, Dhert WJ, Vermonden T, Alblas J. 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0177628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177628.
  77. Stichler S, Bock T, Paxton N, Bertlein S, Levato R, Schill V, Smolan W, Malda J, Tessmar J, Blunk T, Groll J. Double printing of hyaluronic acid/poly(glycidol) hybrid hydrogels with poly($\varepsilon$-caprolactone) for MSC chondrogenesis. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8cb7
  78. Hemshekhar M, Thushara RM, Chandranayaka S, Sherman LS, Kemparaju K, Girish KS. Emerging roles of hyaluronic acid bioscaffolds in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;86:917-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.032
  79. Sakai S, Ohi H, Hotta T, Kamei H, Taya M. Differentiation potential of human adipose stem cells bioprinted with hyaluronic acid/gelatin-based bioink through microextrusion and visible light-initiated crosslinking. Biopolymers. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.031.
  80. Law N, Doney B, Glover H, Qin Y, Aman ZM, Sercombe TB, Liew LJ, Dilley RJ, Doyle BJ. Characterisation of hyaluronic acid methylcellulose hydrogels for 3D bioprinting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;77:389-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.031
  81. Cui X, Boland T. Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials. 2009;30(31):6221-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.056
  82. Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, Chen X, Chandra P, Mo X, Song L, Atala A, Zhao W. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:154-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.008
  83. England S, Rajaram A, Schreyer DJ, Chen X. Bioprinted fibrin-factor XIIIhyaluronate hydrogel scaffolds with encapsulated Schwann cells and their in vitro characterization for use in nerve regeneration. Bioprinting. 2017;5:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2016.12.001.
  84. Lott JR, McAllister JW, Arvidson SA, Bates FS, Lodge TP. Fibrillar structure of methylcellulose hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(8):2484-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400694r
  85. Kobayashi K, Huang CI, Lodge TP. Thermoreversible gelation of aqueous methylcellulose solutions. Macromolecules. 1999;32(21):7070-7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma990242n
  86. Thirumala S, Gimble JM, Devireddy RV. Methylcellulose based thermally reversible hydrogel system for tissue engineering applications. Cell. 2013;2(3):460-75. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells2030460
  87. Wu C, Luo Y, Cuniberti G, Xiao Y, Gelinsky M. Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical and tough mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a controllable pore architecture, excellent mechanical strength and mineralization ability. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(6):2644-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.009
  88. Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, Martinez Avila H, Hagg D, Gatenholm P. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(5):1489-96. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188
  89. Avila HM, Schwarz S, Rotter N, Gatenholm P. 3D bioprinting of human chondrocyte-laden nanocellulose hydrogels for patient-specific auricular cartilage regeneration. Bioprinting. 2016;1:22-35.
  90. Markstedt K, Escalante A, Toriz G, Gatenholm P. Biomimetic inks based on cellulose nanofibrils and cross-linkable xylans for 3D printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(46):40878-86. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b13400
  91. Sultan S, Siqueira G, Zimmermann T, Mathew AP. 3D printing of nanocellulosic biomaterials for medical applications. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.06.002.
  92. Floren M, Bonani W, Dharmarajan A, Motta A, Migliaresi C, Tan W. Human mesenchymal stem cells cultured on silk hydrogels with variable stiffness and growth factor differentiate into mature smooth muscle cell phenotype. Acta Biomater. 2016;31:156-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.051
  93. Das S, Pati F, Choi YJ, Rijal G, Shim JH, Kim SW, Ray AR, Cho DW, Ghosh S. Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:233-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.023
  94. Rodriguez MJ, Brown J, Giordano J, Lin SJ, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL. Silk based bioinks for soft tissue reconstruction using 3-dimensional (3D) printing with in vitro and in vivo assessments. Biomaterials. 2017;117:105-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.046
  95. Compaan AM, Christensen K, Huang Y. Inkjet bioprinting of 3D silk fibroin cellular constructs using sacrificial alginate. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3(8): 1519-26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00432.
  96. Xiong S, Zhang X, Lu P, Wu Y, Wang Q, Sun H, Heng BC, Bunpetch V, Zhang S, Ouyang H. A gelatin-sulfonated silk composite scaffold based on 3D printing technology enhances skin regeneration by stimulating epidermal growth and dermal neovascularization. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4288. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04149-y
  97. Zheng Z, Wu J, Liu M, Wang H, Li C, Rodriguez MJ, Li G, Wang X, Kaplan DL. 3D bioprinting of self-standing silk-based bioink. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701026.
  98. DeSimone E, Schacht K, Pellert A, Scheibel T. Recombinant spider silk-based bioinks. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90db.
  99. Jung JP, Bhuiyan DB, Ogle BM. Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting. Biomater Res. 2016;20(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0074-2.
  100. Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, Kim SW, Rhie JW, Shim JH, Kim DH, Cho DW. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun. 2014;5
  101. Jang J, Kim TG, Kim BS, Kim SW, Kwon SM, Cho DW. Tailoring mechanical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink by vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking. Acta Biomater. 2016;33:88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.013
  102. Ahn G, Min KH, Kim C, Lee JS, Kang D, Won JY, Cho DW, Kim JY, Jin S, Yun WS, Shim JH. Precise stacking of decellularized extracellular matrix based 3D cell-laden constructs by a 3D cell printing system equipped with heating modules. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8624. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09201-5
  103. Jang J, Park HJ, Kim SW, Kim H, Park JY, Na SJ, Kim HJ, Park MN, Choi SH, Park SH, Kim SW. 3D printed complex tissue construct using stem cell-laden decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for cardiac repair. Biomaterials. 2017;112:264-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.026
  104. Jakab K, Damon B, Neagu A, Kachurin A, Forgacs G. Three-dimensional tissue constructs built by bioprinting. Biorheology. 2006;43(3, 4):509-13.
  105. Yu Y, Moncal KK, Li J, Peng W, Rivero I, Martin JA, Ozbolat IT. Threedimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free "tissue strands" as a new bioink. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28714. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28714
  106. Bakirci E, Toprakhisar B, Zeybek MC, Ince GO, Koc B. Cell sheet based bioink for 3D bioprinting applications. Biofabrication. 2017;9(2):024105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa764f
  107. Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater. 2011;23(12)
  108. Guvendiren M, Burdick JA. Engineering synthetic hydrogel microenvironments to instruct stem cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24(5):841-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.009
  109. Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nature Biotech. 2016;34(3):312-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413
  110. Wu W, DeConinck A, Lewis JA. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv Mater. 2011;23:H178-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201004625
  111. Muller M, Becher J, Schnabelrauch M, Zenobi-Wong M. Nanostructured pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2015;7(3): 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035006
  112. Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Finn MG, Lotz M, D'Lima DD. Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18(11-12):1304-12. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0543
  113. Hribar KC, Soman P, Warner J, Chung P, Chen S. Light-assisted direct-write of 3D functional biomaterials. Lab Chip. 2014;14(2):268-75. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3LC50634G
  114. Wust S, Muller R, Hofmann S. 3D bioprinting of complex channels-effects of material, orientation, geometry, and cell embedding. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2015;103(8):2558-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35393
  115. Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW, Cheung PY, Duan B, Malone E, Wu J, Girardi LN, Bonassar LJ, Lipson H, Chu CC. Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication. 2012;4(3):035005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/3/035005
  116. Hong S, Sycks D, Chan HF, Lin S, Lopez GP, Guilak F, Leong KW, Zhao X. 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv Mater. 2015;27(27):4035-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501099
  117. Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE, Burghardt WR, Shah RN. A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Adv Mater. 2015;27(9):1607-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405076
  118. Ji S, Guvendiren M. Recent advances in bioink design for 3D bioprinting of Ttissues and organs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023.
  119. Mozetic P, Maria Giannitelli S, Gori M, Trombetta M, Rainer A. Engineering muscle cell alignment through 3D bioprinting. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36117.
  120. Kucukgul C, Ozler SB, Inci I, Karakas E, Irmak S, Gozuacik D, Taralp A, Koc B. 3D bioprinting of biomimetic aortic vascular constructs with self-supporting cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112(4):811-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25493.
  121. Kim JE, Kim SH, Jung Y. Current status of three-dimensional printing inks for soft tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;13(6):636-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-016-0125-8
  122. Jang J, Park JY, Gao G, Cho DW. Biomaterials-based 3D cell printing for next-generation therapeutics and diagnostics. Biomaterials. 2018;156:88-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.030
  123. Duarte Campos DF, Blaeser A, Korsten A, Neuss S, Jakel J, Vogt M, Fischer H. The stiffness and structure of three-dimensional printed hydrogels direct the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells toward adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;21(3-4):740-56.
  124. Lee W, Lee V, Polio S, Keegan P, Lee JH, Fischer K, Park JK, Yoo SS. Ondemand three-dimensional freeform fabrication of multi-layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010;105(6):1178-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22613
  125. Schiele NR, Chrisey DB, Corr DT. Gelatin-based laser direct-write technique for the precise spatial patterning of cells. Tissue Eng Part A: Methods. 2010; 17(3):289-98.
  126. Duan B, Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Butcher JT. 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101((5):1255-64.
  127. Xu T, Gregory CA, Molnar P, Cui X, Jalota S, Bhaduri SB, Boland T. Viability and electrophysiology of neural cell structures generated by the inkjet printing method. Biomaterials. 2006;27(19):3580-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.048
  128. Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, Cornelissen M, Dubruel P. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials. 2014;35(1):49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078
  129. Levato R, Webb WR, Otto IA, Mensinga A, Zhang Y, van Rijen M, van Weeren R, Khan IM, Malda J. The bio in the ink: cartilage regeneration with bioprintable hydrogels and articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells. Acta Biomater. 2017;61:41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.005
  130. Mouser VH, Melchels FP, Visser J, Dhert WJ, Gawlitta D, Malda J. Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3):035003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035003
  131. Brown GC, Lim KS, Farrugia BL, Hooper GJ, Woodfield TB. Covalent incorporation of heparin improves chondrogenesis in photocurable gelatinmethacryloyl hydrogels. Macromol Biosci. 2017;17(12) https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201700158.

Cited by

  1. Click Chemistry-Based Injectable Hydrogels and Bioprinting Inks for Tissue Engineering Applications vol.15, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0152-8
  2. Mimicking Epithelial Tissues in Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Models vol.6, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00197
  3. Vascularization in 3D printed tissues: emerging technologies to overcome longstanding obstacles vol.2, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3934/celltissue.2018.3.163
  4. CRISPR engineering cardiometabolic disease models using human iPSC vol.2, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3934/celltissue.2018.3.185
  5. Bioprinting of Stem Cells: Interplay of Bioprinting Process, Bioinks, and Stem Cell Properties vol.4, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00399
  6. Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cartilage by the Use of Stem Cells: A Strategy to Improve Regeneration vol.11, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091749
  7. Effect of the pore size in a 3D bioprinted gelatin scaffold on fibroblast proliferation vol.67, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.07.013
  8. Effect of the pore size in a 3D bioprinted gelatin scaffold on fibroblast proliferation vol.67, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.07.013
  9. Tissue engineering the cancer microenvironment—challenges and opportunities vol.10, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-018-0466-8
  10. Cardiovascular tissue bioprinting: Physical and chemical processes vol.5, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5048807
  11. Stabilization strategies in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering vol.5, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055659
  12. Recent advances in stem cell therapeutics and tissue engineering strategies vol.22, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0148-4
  13. 3D Printing Applied to Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts vol.8, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122631
  14. Characterization and printability of Sodium alginate -Gelatin hydrogel for bioprinting NSCLC co-culture vol.9, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55034-9
  15. Evaluation of Rheological Properties and Cytotoxicity of Bioinks vol.4, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2019.40
  16. Comprehensive Evaluation of Organotypic and Microphysiological Liver Models for Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury vol.10, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01093
  17. Emerging polymeric materials in additive manufacturing for use in biomedical applications vol.6, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2019.1.1
  18. Engineering Precision Medicine vol.6, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201801039
  19. Gelatin‐polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: Towards natural therapeutics vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10124
  20. Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs vol.1, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100008
  21. Direct Experimental Evidence of Biomimetic Surfaces with Chemical Modifications Interfering with Adhesive Protein Adsorption vol.24, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010027
  22. 3D Printing of Neural Tissues Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using a Fibrin-Based Bioink vol.5, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01235
  23. The Adoption of Three-Dimensional Additive Manufacturing from Biomedical Material Design to 3D Organ Printing vol.9, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9040811
  24. 3D Printing of Silk Fibroin for Biomedical Applications vol.12, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12030504
  25. Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review vol.30, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6234-x
  26. Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging technique for biological model fabrication vol.6, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5059393
  27. Tissue/organ-derived bioink formulation for 3D bioprinting vol.3, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2018-0024
  28. Recent Strategies in Extrusion-Based Three-Dimensional Cell Printing toward Organ Biofabrication vol.5, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00691
  29. The Evolution of Tissue Engineered Vascular Graft Technologies: From Preclinical Trials to Advancing Patient Care vol.9, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9071274
  30. Synthetic Biodegradable Aliphatic Polyester Nanocomposites Reinforced with Nanohydroxyapatite and/or Graphene Oxide for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications vol.9, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040590
  31. Synthetic Biology for Multiscale Designed Biomimetic Assemblies: From Designed Self-Assembling Biopolymers to Bacterial Bioprinting vol.58, pp.16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00922
  32. 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay vol.11, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6
  33. 3D bioprinting models of neural tissues: The current state of the field and future directions vol.150, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.06.007
  34. iPSC Bioprinting: Where are We at? vol.12, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12152453
  35. Engineering Functional Cardiac Tissues for Regenerative Medicine Applications vol.21, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1178-9
  36. Bioprinting Approaches to Engineering Vascularized 3D Cardiac Tissues vol.21, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1179-8
  37. Sodium Alginate/Gelatine Hydrogels for Direct Bioprinting-The Effect of Composition Selection and Applied Solvents on the Bioink Properties vol.12, pp.17, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172669
  38. An Overview of Hydrogel-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting of Soft Tissues vol.99, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00129-5
  39. Nanocellulose-Based Inks-Effect of Alginate Content on the Water Absorption of 3D Printed Constructs vol.6, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030065
  40. 3D Printing of Functional Microalgal Silk Structures for Environmental Applications vol.5, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00554
  41. Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering vol.11, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e
  42. Tumor Cells Develop Defined Cellular Phenotypes After 3D-Bioprinting in Different Bioinks vol.8, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101295
  43. Proof of concept, design, and manufacture via 3‐D printing of a mesh with bactericidal capacity: Behaviour in vitro and in vivo vol.13, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2944
  44. Review of Advanced Hydrogel-Based Cell Encapsulation Systems for Insulin Delivery in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus vol.11, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11110597
  45. Recent advances in the development of nature-derived photocrosslinkable biomaterials for 3D printing in tissue engineering vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-019-0168-8
  46. Skin bioprinting: the future of burn wound reconstruction? vol.7, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0142-7
  47. Cell-Electrospinning and Its Application for Tissue Engineering vol.20, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246208
  48. Graphene oxide/alginate composites as novel bioinks for three-dimensional mesenchymal stem cell printing and bone regeneration applications vol.11, pp.48, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr07643c
  49. Dendritic Hydrogel Bioink for 3D Printing of Bacterial Microhabitat vol.2, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00866
  50. Three-Dimensional Printing: A Catalyst for a Changing Orthopaedic Landscape vol.8, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.19.00076
  51. Hyaluronic acid as a bioactive component for bone tissue regeneration: Fabrication, modification, properties, and biological functions vol.9, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2020-0084
  52. 3D Bioprinting Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Neural Tissues Using a Novel Fibrin Bioink Containing Drug Releasing Microspheres vol.8, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00057
  53. 3D Printed Biomimetic Rabbit Airway Simulation Model for Nasotracheal Intubation Training vol.7, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.587524
  54. 3D‐Printed Sugar Scaffold for High‐Precision and Highly Sensitive Active and Passive Wearable Sensors vol.7, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902521
  55. Cartilage and bone tissue engineering using adipose stromal/stem cells spheroids as building blocks vol.12, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v12.i2.110
  56. The Potential Impact and Timeline of Engineering on Congenital Interventions vol.41, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02335-w
  57. Recent Applications of Three Dimensional Printing in Cardiovascular Medicine vol.9, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030742
  58. 3D Printing for the Clinic: Examining Contemporary Polymeric Biomaterials and Their Clinical Utility vol.21, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01539
  59. Addressing present pitfalls in 3D printing for tissue engineering to enhance future potential vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5127860
  60. Sterilization Methods and Their Influence on Physicochemical Properties and Bioprinting of Alginate as a Bioink Component vol.5, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04096
  61. Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability vol.12, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d
  62. Editorial for the Special Issue on 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine vol.11, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11040366
  63. Materials and technical innovations in 3D printing in biomedical applications vol.8, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00034e
  64. 3D Bioprinting for Vascularized Tissue-Engineered Bone Fabrication vol.13, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102278
  65. 3D Extracellular Matrix Mimics: Fundamental Concepts and Role of Materials Chemistry to Influence Stem Cell Fate vol.21, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00045
  66. Fabrication of Aligned Biomimetic Gellan Gum-Chitosan Microstructures through 3D Printed Microfluidic Channels and Multiple In Situ Cross-Linking Mechanisms vol.6, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00260
  67. A universal self‐eroding sacrificial bioink that enables bioprinting at room temperature vol.31, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4892
  68. Emerging Biomimetic Materials for Studying Tumor and Immune Cell Behavior vol.48, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02384-0
  69. Evaluation of a cell-based osteogenic formulation compliant with good manufacturing practice for use in tissue engineering vol.47, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05588-z
  70. 3D Printing Approach in Dentistry: The Future for Personalized Oral Soft Tissue Regeneration vol.9, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072238
  71. Hyaluronic acid as a bioink for extrusion-based 3D printing vol.12, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8752
  72. Improvement of cell deposition by self-absorbent capability of freeze-dried 3D-bioprinted scaffolds derived from cellulose material-alginate hydrogels vol.6, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ab8fc6
  73. Peptide Chitosan/Dextran Core/Shell Vascularized 3D Constructs for Wound Healing vol.12, pp.29, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c07212
  74. 허혈성 심혈관 질환의 치료제로서 혈관내피전구세포(EPC)의 가능성에 대한 고찰 vol.30, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2020.30.7.651
  75. Synthetic Polymers for Organ 3D Printing vol.12, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081765
  76. Natural 3D-Printed Bioinks for Skin Regeneration and Wound Healing: A Systematic Review vol.12, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081782
  77. Biological responses to physicochemical properties of biomaterial surface vol.49, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00103a
  78. Advances in Extrusion 3D Bioprinting: A Focus on Multicomponent Hydrogel‐Based Bioinks vol.9, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901648
  79. Dynamic Bioinks to Advance Bioprinting vol.9, pp.15, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901798
  80. From cells-on-a-chip to organs-on-a-chip: scaffolding materials for 3D cell culture in microfluidics vol.8, pp.31, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00718h
  81. Granular hydrogels for 3D bioprinting applications vol.1, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/viw.20200060
  82. Recent Trends in Three-Dimensional Bioinks Based on Alginate for Biomedical Applications vol.13, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183980
  83. Hybrid Spider Silk with Inorganic Nanomaterials vol.10, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091853
  84. Reduced Supply in the Organ Donor Market and How 3D Printing Can Address This Shortage: A Critical Inquiry into the Collateral Effects of Driverless Cars vol.10, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186400
  85. 3D Printing of Cytocompatible Gelatin‐Cellulose‐Alginate Blend Hydrogels vol.20, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202000106
  86. Self-crosslinking hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel enhances multilayered 3D-printed construct shape integrity and mechanical stability for soft tissue engineering vol.12, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba2f7
  87. Preliminary engineering for in situ in vivo bioprinting: a novel micro bioprinting platform for in situ in vivo bioprinting at a gastric wound site vol.12, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba4ff
  88. Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks vol.120, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00015
  89. Bioprinting: From Tissue and Organ Development to in Vitro Models vol.120, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00789
  90. Ultrasonic Microplotting of Microgel Bioinks vol.12, pp.42, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c15056
  91. Background-free fibre optic Brillouin probe for remote mapping of micromechanics vol.11, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.404535
  92. An Alkaline Based Method for Generating Crystalline, Strong, and Shape Memory Polyvinyl Alcohol Biomaterials vol.7, pp.21, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902740
  93. An insight into cell-laden 3D-printed constructs for bone tissue engineering vol.8, pp.43, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb02019b
  94. Designing Decellularized Extracellular Matrix‐Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting vol.9, pp.24, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000734
  95. Three‐dimensional printing of extracellular matrix (ECM)‐mimicking scaffolds: A critical review of the current ECM materials vol.108, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36981
  96. 3D bioprinting for reconstituting the cancer microenvironment vol.4, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-020-0121-2
  97. The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes vol.26, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0210
  98. Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting Technology and Its Applications for Tissue Engineering vol.12, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122958
  99. Hydrogel‐Based 3D Bioprinting for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering vol.15, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202000095
  100. 3D bioprinting applications for the printing of skin: A brief study vol.2, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100123
  101. Exploring the possibilities of FDM filaments comprising natural fiber-reinforced biocomposites for additive manufacturing vol.8, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2021032
  102. Nano-biomaterials for designing functional bioinks towards complex tissue and organ regeneration in 3D bioprinting vol.37, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101639
  103. Challenges and solutions for fabrication of three-dimensional cocultures of neural cell-loaded biomimetic constructs vol.16, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0000700
  104. Candidate Bioinks for Extrusion 3D Bioprinting-A Systematic Review of the Literature vol.9, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.616753
  105. Additive Manufacturing of Biopolymers for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: An Overview, Potential Applications, Advancements, and Trends vol.2021, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4907027
  106. A Review of Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting With an Eye on Future Regenerative Therapies in Veterinary Medicine vol.7, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.584193
  107. Drug‐loading three‐dimensional scaffolds based on hydroxyapatite‐sodium alginate for bone regeneration vol.109, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37018
  108. Natural Biomaterials and Their Use as Bioinks for Printing Tissues vol.8, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8020027
  109. Advancement of Scaffold-Based 3D Cellular Models in Cancer Tissue Engineering: An Update vol.11, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.733652
  110. Stimuli-responsive engineered living materials vol.17, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0sm01905d
  111. Bioresorbable Polymers: Advanced Materials and 4D Printing for Tissue Engineering vol.13, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040563
  112. A Review of Vat Photopolymerization Technology: Materials, Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends of 3D Printing vol.13, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040598
  113. Building three-dimensional lung models for studying pharmacokinetics of inhaled drugs vol.170, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.09.008
  114. In vitro characterization of xeno-free clinically relevant human collagen and its applicability in cell-laden 3D bioprinting vol.35, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328220959162
  115. Polymeric Bioinks for 3D Hepatic Printing vol.3, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry3010014
  116. Modeling the Mechanobiology of Cancer Cell Migration Using 3D Biomimetic Hydrogels vol.7, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7010017
  117. Current Insights into 3D Bioprinting: An Advanced Approach for Eye Tissue Regeneration vol.13, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13030308
  118. Effects of Lyophilization on the Release Profiles of 3D Printed Delivery Systems Fabricated with Carboxymethyl Cellulose Hydrogel vol.13, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050749
  119. Cell-Laden Nanocellulose/Chitosan-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Enhanced Osteogenic Cell Differentiation vol.4, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01108
  120. Development of a Biomimetic Hydrogel Based on Predifferentiated Mesenchymal Stem‐Cell‐Derived ECM for Cartilage Tissue Engineering vol.10, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001847
  121. The Use of 3D Printers in Medical Education with a Focus on Bone Pathology vol.31, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01222-0
  122. 3D Bioprinting of Functional Skin Substitutes: From Current Achievements to Future Goals vol.14, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14040362
  123. Emerging Biofabrication Techniques: A Review on Natural Polymers for Biomedical Applications vol.13, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081209
  124. Protein-Based 3D Biofabrication of Biomaterials vol.8, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8040048
  125. 3D Printing for Soft Tissue Regeneration and Applications in Medicine vol.9, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040336
  126. Regulation of Cell Types Within Testicular Organoids vol.162, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqab033
  127. Synthesis and characterization of chemically crosslinked gelatin and chitosan to produce hydrogels for biomedical applications vol.32, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5257
  128. Collagen in Wound Healing vol.8, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8050063
  129. Bioinks-materials used in printing cells in designed 3D forms vol.32, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2021.1892470
  130. Polymeric biomaterials for 3D printing in medicine: An overview vol.2, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100011
  131. 3D printing in biomedical engineering: Processes, materials, and applications vol.8, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0024177
  132. Chitooligosaccharides and their structural-functional effect on hydrogels: A review vol.261, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117882
  133. Testing the methodology for evaluating the accuracy of the 3d printing vol.1942, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1942/1/012057
  134. 3D Bioprinting and Translation of Beta Cell Replacement Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes vol.27, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0192
  135. Synthesis and characterization of photopolymerizable hydrogels based on poly (ethylene glycol) for biomedical applications vol.138, pp.21, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50489
  136. Synthesis and characterization of photopolymerizable hydrogels based on poly (ethylene glycol) for biomedical applications vol.138, pp.21, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50489
  137. In Situ 3D Printing: Opportunities with Silk Inks vol.39, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.11.003
  138. Progress in cardiovascular bioprinting vol.45, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13913
  139. Recent advancements in the bioprinting of vascular grafts vol.13, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac0963
  140. Ultrashort Peptide Bioinks Support Automated Printing of Large-Scale Constructs Assuring Long-Term Survival of Printed Tissue Constructs vol.21, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04426
  141. Chemo-mechanical modelling of swelling and crosslinking reaction kinetics in alginate hydrogels: A novel theory and its numerical implementation vol.153, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104476
  142. Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Bioactive Factors, and Scaffolds in Bone Repair: From Research Perspectives to Clinical Practice vol.10, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10081925
  143. Tissue-Specific Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioinks for Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration and Modeling Using 3D Bioprinting Technology vol.22, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157837
  144. Review of Low-Cost 3D Bioprinters: State of the Market and Observed Future Trends vol.26, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/24726303211020297
  145. Three-Dimensional Printing Using a Maize Protein: Zein-Based Inks in Biomedical Applications vol.7, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00544
  146. 3D printing silk-gelatin-propanediol scaffold with enhanced osteogenesis properties through p-Smad1/5/8 activated Runx2 pathway vol.32, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2021.1912977
  147. Hydrogel prepared by 3D printing technology and its applications in the medical field vol.44, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2021.100498
  148. Biofabrication Strategies for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Evolution towards Clinical Applications vol.8, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8090123
  149. Adenosine-treated bioprinted muscle constructs prolong cell survival and improve tissue formation vol.4, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00128-5
  150. Composite Inks for Extrusion Printing of Biological and Biomedical Constructs vol.7, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01158
  151. Trends in Double Networks as Bioprintable and Injectable Hydrogel Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration vol.7, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01749
  152. Integrated 3D Printing-Based Framework-A Strategy to Fabricate Tubular Structures with Mechanocompromised Hydrogels vol.4, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00644
  153. Exploiting the role of nanoparticles for use in hydrogel-based bioprinting applications: concept, design, and recent advances vol.9, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1bm00605c
  154. A 3D Bioprinted In Vitro Model of Pulmonary Artery Atresia to Evaluate Endothelial Cell Response to Microenvironment vol.10, pp.20, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100968
  155. Translational Application of 3D Bioprinting for Cartilage Tissue Engineering vol.8, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8100144
  156. Development of photo-crosslinkable platelet lysate-based hydrogels for 3D printing and tissue engineering vol.13, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac1993
  157. Preparation and characterization of a novel polysialic acid/gelatin composite hydrogels cross-linked by tannic acid to improve wound healing after cesarean section dressing vol.32, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2021.1950961
  158. The effect of borate bioactive glass on the printability of methylcellulose-manuka honey hydrogels vol.36, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00256-9
  159. An overview on the advantages and limitations of 3D printing of microneedles vol.26, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2021.1965163
  160. 3D Printing of Bioinspired Alginate‐Albumin Based Instant Gel Ink with Electroconductivity and Its Expansion to Direct Four‐Axis Printing of Hollow Porous Tubular Constructs without Suppor vol.31, pp.45, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202104441
  161. Bioprinting Au Natural: The Biologics of Bioinks vol.11, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111593
  162. A Novel Additive Manufacturing Method of Cellulose Gel vol.14, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226988
  163. Biomimicked hierarchical 2D and 3D structures from natural templates: applications in cell biology vol.16, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ac21a7
  164. Intrinsic Field-Induced Nanoparticle Assembly in Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Polymeric Composites vol.13, pp.44, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12763
  165. The promising rise of bioprinting in revolutionalizing medical science: Advances and possibilities vol.18, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2021.05.006
  166. Positive-charge tuned gelatin hydrogel-siSPARC injectable for siRNA anti-scarring therapy in post glaucoma filtration surgery vol.11, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80542-4
  167. Elastin-like Polypeptide-Based Bioink: A Promising Alternative for 3D Bioprinting vol.22, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00861
  168. Nanocomposite Conductive Bioinks Based on Low-Concentration GelMA and MXene Nanosheets/Gold Nanoparticles Providing Enhanced Printability of Functional Skeletal Muscle Tissues vol.7, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01193
  169. Advances in Photocrosslinkable Materials for 3D Bioprinting vol.24, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202100663
  170. Tricomposite gelatin-carboxymethylcellulose-alginate bioink for direct and indirect 3D printing of human knee meniscal scaffold vol.195, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.184
  171. Printable gelatin, alginate and boron nitride nanotubes hydrogel-based ink for 3D bioprinting and tissue engineering applications vol.213, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110362