Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing (기본간호학회지)

Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing (기본간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Examiner's Verbal Feedback on Nursing Students' Accuracy of Self-assessment, Emotional Response, Self-efficacy, and Perceived Quality of Feedback in Skill Performance Assessment

술기 수행 평가에서 평가자의 유형별 피드백이 간호대학생의 자가 평가의 정확성, 정서반응, 자기효능감, 인지하는 피드백의 질에 미치는 효과

  • Kim, Eun Jung (Division of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University)
  • 김은정 (한림대학교 의과대학 간호학부.간호학연구소)
  • Received : 2018.02.19
  • Accepted : 2018.05.01
  • Published : 2018.05.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, effects of positive, negative, and mixed verbal feedback were examined for accuracy of self-assessment, emotional responses, self-efficacy, and perceived quality of feedback in skill performance assessment. Methods: Participants were a convenience sample of 104 second-year nursing students who had completed their fundamentals of nursing class. Participants were assigned randomly to a positive, a negative or a mixed feedback group. All participants completed the performance measure and then received the assigned the type of feedback from an evaluator. After delivery of feedback, they assessed their own performance using the same sheet as the evaluator and completed the survey for emotional response, self-efficacy for learning, and quality of feedback. Results: There were no significant differences in accuracy of self-assessment and perceived quality of feedback among the three groups ($x^2=4.74$, p=.094; $x^2=3.30$, p=.192, respectively). The negative feedback group had significantly lower self-efficacy and positive emotions and more negative emotions than the other two groups (F=9.43, p=.009; $x^2=16.29$, p<.001; $x^2=5.69$, p=.005, respectively). Conclusion: Negative feedback can affect emotions and motivations for learning in nursing students and may interfere with the effectiveness of feedback, so instructors should pay more attention when providing negative feedback. Mixed feedback with an effect similar to positive feedback could be an alternative.

Keywords

References

  1. Van de Ridder JM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, Ten Cate OT. What is feedback in clinical education? Medical Education. 2008;42(2):189-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x
  2. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 2007;77(1):81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
  3. Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illing J, et al. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Medical Teacher. 2008;30(2):124-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701881699.
  4. Langendyk V. Not knowing that they do not know: Self-assessment accuracy of 3rd year medical students. Medical Education. 2006;40(2):173-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02372.x
  5. Fjortoft N. Self-assessment in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2006;70(3):Article 64. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700364
  6. Schartel SA. Giving feedback-An integral part of education. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 2012;26(1):77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2012.02.003
  7. Clynes MP, Raftery SE. Feedback: An essential element of student learning in clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 2008;8(6):405-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2008.02.003
  8. Ilies R, De Pater IE, Judge T. Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feedback, and the role of self-esteem. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(6):590-609. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710778459
  9. Dimotakis N, Mitchell D, Maurer T. Positive and negative assessment center feedback in relation to development self-efficacy, feedback seeking, and promotion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017;102(11):1514-1527. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000228
  10. Higgins ET, Shah J, Friedman R. Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72(3):515-525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515
  11. Belschak FD, Den Hartog DN. Consequences of positive and negative feedback: The impact on emotions and extra-role behaviors. Applied Psychology. 2009;58(2):274-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00336.x
  12. Brockner J, Higgins ET. Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2001;86(1):35-66. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2972
  13. Sprouls K, Mathur SR, Upreti G. Is positive feedback a forgotten classroom practice? findings and implications for at-risk students. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 2015;59(3):153-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2013.876958
  14. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin. 1996;119(2):254-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
  15. Boehler ML, Rogers DA, Schwind CJ, Mayforth R, Quin J, Williams RG, et al. An investigation of medical students reactions to feedback: A randomized controlled trial. Medical Education. 2006;40(8):746-749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02503.x
  16. Ilgen D, Davis C. Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2000;49(3):550-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00031
  17. Dohrenwend A. Serving up the feedback sandwich. Family Practice Management. 2002;9(10):43-46.
  18. Kim EJ. The relationships among learning motivation, perceived achievement, and actual achievement on nursing skill performance assessment. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2017;23(1):48-56. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2017.23.1.48
  19. Lee HJ. The interaction effects between goal importance, performance feedback, achievement goal orientations on self-regulation: Colleges students' studying time. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013;27(4):829-852.
  20. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. Accreditation criteria of nursing education [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education; 2013 [cited 2015 March 23]. Available from: http://www.kabon.or.kr/kabon02/index04.php
  21. Choi EJ. Effects of positive and negative feedback sequence on work performance and emotional responses [master's thesis]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University; 2015. p. 11-12.
  22. Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1993;53(3):801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  23. Koh LC. Refocusing formative feedback to enhance learning in pre-registration nurse education. Nurse Education in Practice. 2008;8(4):223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.08.002
  24. Han SM. The Relationships between the academic motivation variables, cognitive strategies and academic achievement. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 2004;18(1):329-350.
  25. Jeon BJ. Self-esteem: A test of its measurability, The Yonsei Journal. 1974;11(1):107-129.
  26. Plakht Y, Shiyovich A, Nusbaum L, Raizer H. The association of positive and negative feedback with clinical performance, self-evaluation and practice contribution of nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2013;33(10):1264-1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.017
  27. Kim EJ, Ko EJ. Comparison of students' self-assessment and examiner's assessment on performance in a high fidelity simulation. Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing. 2017;5(1):1-8.
  28. Kannappan A, Yip DT, Lodhia NA, Morton J, Lau JN. The effect of positive and negative verbal feedback on surgical skills performance and motivation. Journal of Surgical Education. 2012;69(6):798-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.05.012
  29. Khowaja AA, Gul RB. Perceptions and experiences of written feedback of nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Education. 2014;6(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0974-9357.6.1.001
  30. Jin S. Effects of motivational dispositions and feedback types on learners' emotions with the unfamiliar task. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2016;16(2):505-524.

Cited by

  1. Mindfulness, Self-Efficacy, and Stress Among Final-Year Nursing Students vol.57, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20181031-01
  2. 술기 수행에서 간호대학생의 동료피드백 유형 및 동료피드백에 대한 정서반응, 피드백의 질, 학습자기효능감 vol.25, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2019.25.2.186