DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Roles of Regional Innovation Agencies and their Performance in Dortmund, Germany

지역혁신 지원기관의 역할과 성과: 독일 도르트문트시를 사례로

  • Shin, Dong-Ho (Department of Public Administration, Hannam University)
  • Received : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Since the 1950s, many of the traditional industrial cities of advanced economies in Europe and North America were affected by a series of de-industrialization. The de-industrialization process, characterized by company shut-downs and massive lay-offs, has resulted in high unemployment rates and massive redundancies in physical infrastructure. Since the 1980s, many of the old industrial cities have attempted to overcome such problems. However, it has been found that not many of the cities are found to be successful. The City of Dortmund, one of the core cities of the large German industrial conurbation of the past, the Ruhr, is found to be an exceptional case demonstrating a clear success in overcoming deindustrialization problems. The City in fact strategically pursued transforming backbone of its economy from steel-making, coal-mining and beer-brewery to high-technology and future-oriented industries, based on microsystems, biomedical, electronic logistics and information technology. This paper attempts to analyse the processes and outcomes of transforming Dortmund beginning from the 1980s to articulate the roles of the agencies contributing to the success.

독일 도르트문트시는 전통적 공업도시로 한때 유럽 최대의 공업지역인 루르의 중심도시였다. 그러나 1950년대 이후 탈산업화로 인해 심각한 피해가 있었다. 그 후 도르트문트는 공격적이고 지속적인 지역재생정책과 사업으로 도시의 면모를 바꾸어 나아가고 있다. 1990년대에는 루르지역 전체를 대상으로 한 국제건축공모전으로, 2000년대에는 자체적인 도르트문트 프로젝트로, 그리고 2010년대에는 스마트 시티 전략으로 지역을 혁신하는 가운데 도시의 성장경로를 바꾸어 나아가고 있다. 본 연구는 도르트문트의 이러한 지역재생정책의 성과를 분석하고, 그러한 성과가 나타나게 하는 행위주체의 역할과 그들간의 관계를 규명하고자 한다. 본 연구는 지역혁신체제론과 경로이론에 입각하여 필자가 수집한 다양한 자료를 분석하고, 정책적, 이론적 시사점을 도출하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고석찬, 2004, 지역혁신이론과 전략, 서울: 대영문화사.
  2. 김정곤, 2004, "지속가능한 도시로 새로 태어난 공업도시, 겔진키로헨," 국토, pp.74-79.
  3. 오덕성.박재묵.강병수.박천보, 1995, "과학기술도시와 지역개발 (2): 독일의 기술단지," 국토계획 32(2), pp.135-158.
  4. 오덕성.최영일, 2005, "독일의 지역혁신 클러스터 구축과 Technopark의 역할에 관한 연구," 국토계획 40(3), pp.107-122.
  5. 신동호, 2004, "독일 도르트문트시의 지역혁신체제: 첨단 산업단지 중소기업 지원기관을 사례로," 한국경제지리학회지 7(3), pp.385-406.
  6. 신동호, 2006, "독일 루르지역의 지역혁신정책 거버넌스 연구: 혁신주체간 협력관계를 중심으로," 한국경제지리학회지 9(2), pp.167-180.
  7. 신동호, 2014a, "독일 도르트문트시의 도시재개발 사업: 피닉스와 슈타트크로네지구에 대한 사례연구," 부동산연구 24(4), pp.39-53.
  8. 신동호, 2014b, "독일루르지역의 지역재생정책: 추진과정과 성과에 대한 경로이론적 접근," 한국경제지리학회지 17(1), pp.250-213.
  9. 신동호, 2015, "독일 루르지역의 도시재생정책: 오버하우젠시와 겔젠키르헨시를 사례로," 한국경제지리학회지 18(1), pp.60-75.
  10. 신동호.김정곤, 2004, "'Dortmund Projekt': 독일 도르트문트시의 혁신 클러스터 조성전략," 국토계획 39(4), pp.163-174.
  11. 신동호.박은병, 2003, "독일 도르트문트시의 지역혁신체제," 국토계획 38(2), pp.1-15.
  12. 정선양, 1999, 독일 공공연구기관의 연구회 체제 분석연구, 과학기술정책연구원 연구보고 2003-01.
  13. Arthur, W. B., 1989, "Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events," The Economic Journal 99(394), pp.116-131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234208
  14. Becker, E. and Hermann, S., 2013, "Changing dark coal into illuminating high-tech: Ways out of an economic crisis in Dortmund, Germany," World Technopolis Review 1(4), pp.276-286. https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2012.1.4.276
  15. Bluestone, B. and Harrison, B., 1982, The deindustrialization of America, New York: Basic Books.
  16. Boschma, R., 2015, "Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience," Regional Studies 49(5), pp.733-751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
  17. Braczyk, H., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M., 1997, Regional Innovation Systems, London: UCL Press.
  18. Camagni, R., 1995, "The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions," Papers in Regional Science 74(4), pp.317-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1995.tb00644.x
  19. Cooke, P., 1998, Introduction: Origins of the concept, in Braczyk, H. J., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, H. J. (eds.), Regional Innovation Systems, London: UCL Press. pp.2-25.
  20. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. and Braczyk, B., 2004, Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World, London: Routledge.
  21. Cowley, R., Joss, S. and Dayot, Y., 2018, "The smart city and its publics: Insights from across six UK cities," Urban Research and Practice 11(1), pp.53-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1293150
  22. David, P. A., 1985, "Clio and the economics of QWERTY," Economic History 75(2), pp.332-337.
  23. Degen, M. and Garcia, M., 2012, "Can a knowledge-based cluster be created? The case of the Barcelona 22@district?" International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 36(5), pp.1022-1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01152.x
  24. Garud, R. and Karnoe, P., 2001, Path creation as a process of mindful deviation, in Garud, R. and Karnoe, P. (eds.), Path Dependence and Creation, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.1-38.
  25. Grabher, G., 1993, The weakness of strong ties: the Lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area, in Grabher, G. (ed.), The Embeded Frim: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, London: Routledge, pp.255-277.
  26. GREMI, 1992, Development Prospects of the Community's Lagging Regions and the Socio-economic Consequences of the Completion of the Internal Market: an Approach in terms of Local Milieux and the Innovation Networks, Final Report to the Commission of the European Communities, October, Milan.
  27. Hilbert, J., Nordhause-Janz, J., Refield, D. and Heinze, R. G., 2001, Industrial clusters and the governance of change: Lessons from North Rhine-Westphalia, in Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. and Braczyk, H. J. (eds.), Regional Innovation Systems: the Role of Governance in a Globalized World, 2nd edition. London: Routrage, pp.234-258.
  28. Holling, C. S., 1973, "Resilience and stability of ecological systems," Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, pp.1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
  29. Hooghes, L. and Marks, G., 2001, "Types of multi-level governance: What? where? why?" in paper of conference, entitled "Multi-level governance: interdisiplinary perspectives", The University of Sheffield.
  30. Jessop, B., 1998, "The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development," International Social Science Journal 55, pp.29-46.
  31. Jonas, M., 2014, "The Dortmund case: On the enactment of an economic imaginary," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(6), pp.2123-2140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12092
  32. Kiese, M., 2017, "Structural change in the Ruhr: Towards a knowledge-based economy," a paper presented at Hannam Universuty, Korea, Sept 28.
  33. Kilper, H. and Wood, G., 2005, Restructuring policies: the Emscher Park International Building Exhibition, in Cooke, P. (ed.), The Rise of the Rustbelt, London: UCL Press, pp.208-230.
  34. Knapp, W., Kunzman, K. R. and Schmitt, P., 2004, "A cooperative spatial for RhineRuhr," European Planning Studies 12(3), pp.323-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000195047
  35. Leon, K., 2008, "Attract and connect: the 22@Barcelona innovation district and the internationalisation of Barcelona business," Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 10, pp.235-246. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.235
  36. Lundvall, B., 1992, National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.
  37. Martin, R. and Simmie, J., 2008, "Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions," Innovation: Management, Policy& Practice 10(2/3), pp.183-196. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.183
  38. Martin, R. and Sunley, P., 2006, "Path dependence and regional economic evolution," Journal of Economic Geography 6, pp.395-437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
  39. Menzel, M-P. and Fornahl, D., 2009, "Cluster life-cycles: Dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution," Industrial and Corporate Change 22, pp.205-238.
  40. Nelson, R. R., 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, London: Oxford University Press.
  41. Piirainen, K. A., Tanner, A. N. and Alkaersig, L., 2017, "Regional foresight and dynamics of smart specialization: A typology of regional diversification patterns," Technological Forecasting and Social Change 115, pp.289-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.027
  42. Pugh, R., 2018, "Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: Regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions," Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(3), pp.530-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417717069
  43. Rollinghoff, S. and Westphal, T., 2016, "Phoenix from the ashes: Dortmund's cluster policy and urban development since 2000," World Technopolis Review 5(4), pp.119-130. https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2016.5.2.119
  44. Saxenian, A., 1994, Regional Advantage, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press.
  45. Schumpeter, J.A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, London: Transaction.
  46. Shaw, R., 2002, "The International Building Exhibition(IBA) Emscher Park, Germany: A model for sustainable restructuring?," European Planning Studies 10(1), pp.77-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120099272
  47. Simmie, J. and Martin, R., 2010, "The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions: Economy and Society 3(1), pp.27-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp029
  48. Stadt Dortmund (Fachbereich Statistik), 2011, Dortmund Staticticner 196: Jahresbericht 2011-Wirtshaft.
  49. Zimmermann, K., Hundt, C., Juette, C. and Pofalla, C., 2017, "Dortmund, Duisburg und die Rezession von 2008/2009, Warum zwei Staedte derselben Region oeknomisch untelschiedlich regilient sind," Raumforsch Raumordn 75, pp.439-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017-0483-2
  50. Becker, Eberhard. 전 도르트문트대학 총장, 2018년 7월 10일 면담.
  51. Hansemann, Peter. ICN GmbH 사장, 2018년 7월 11일 면담.
  52. Herrmann, Simone. 도르트문트 기술센터 홍보과장, 2018년 7월 11일 면담.
  53. Huelsmann, Thorsten. EffizienzCluster 단장, 2018년 7월 9일 면담.
  54. Krieger, Fritz. 도르트문트대학 기술이전센터장, 2018년 7월 9일 면담.
  55. Liening, Andreas. 도르트문트대학 경상대학장, 2018년 7월 10일 면담.
  56. Rollinghoff, Stefan. 도르트문트시 경제지원단 연구원, 2018년 7월 10일 면담.
  57. Tiews, Sylvia. Start2Grow 담당자, 2018년 7월 12일 면담.

Cited by

  1. 세계적 테크노폴: 프랑스 소피아 앙티폴리스의 지역혁신 성과 vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2020.23.1.110