Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine (대한예방의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Urinary Mercury Levels Among Workers in E-waste Shops in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand

  • Decharat, Somsiri (Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Health and Sports Science, Thaksin University)
  • Received : 2018.02.21
  • Accepted : 2018.06.08
  • Published : 2018.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: To determine urinary mercury levels in e-waste workers in Southern Thailand and the airborne mercury levels in the e-waste shops where they worked, to describe the associations between urinary and airborne mercury levels, and to evaluate the prevalence of mercury exposure-related health effects among e-waste workers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by interviewing 79 workers in 25 e-waste shops who lived in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand. Information on general and occupational characteristics, personal protective equipment use, and personal hygiene was collected by questionnaire. Urine samples were collected to determine mercury levels using a cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrometer mercury analyzer. Results: The e-waste workers' urinary mercury levels were $11.60{\mu}5.23{\mu}g/g$ creatinine (range, 2.00 to $26.00{\mu}g/g$ creatinine) and the mean airborne mercury levels were $17.00{\mu}0.50{\mu}g/m^3$ (range, 3.00 to $29.00{\mu}g/m^3$). The urinary and airborne mercury levels were significantly correlated (r=0.552, p<0.001). The prevalence of self-reported symptoms was 46.8% for insomnia, 36.7% for muscle atrophy, 24.1% for weakness, and 20.3% for headaches. Conclusions: Personal hygiene was found to be an important protective factor, and should therefore be stressed in educational programs. Employers should implement engineering measures to reduce urinary mercury levels and the prevalence of associated health symptoms among e-waste workers.

Keywords

References

  1. Wikipedia. Electronic waste [cited 2017 Dec 12]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_waste.
  2. Sthiannopkao S, Wong MH. Handling e-waste in developed and developing countries: initiatives, practices, and consequences. Sci Total Environ 2013;463-464:1147-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.088
  3. US Environmental Protection Agency. Statistics on the management of used and end-of-life electronics; 2012 [cited 2017 Dec 12]. Available from: https://twosidesna.org/US/u-s-environmental-protection-agency-epa-website-statistics-on-the-management-of-used-and-end-of-life-electronics/.
  4. Wong CS, Duzgoren-Aydin NS, Aydin A, Wong MH. Evidence of excessive releases of metals from primitive e-waste processing in Guiyu, China. Environ Pollut 2007;148(1):62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.11.006
  5. Frazzoli C, Orisakwe OE, Dragone R, Mantovani A. Diagnostic health risk assessment of electronic waste on the general population in developing countries' scenarios. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2010;30(6):388-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.12.004
  6. Zhang S, Forssberg E. Mechanical separation-oriented characterization of electronic scrap. Resour Conserv Recycl 1997; 21(4):247-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(97)00039-6
  7. Perkins DN, Brune Drisse MN, Nxele T, Sly PD. E-waste: a global hazard. Ann Glob Health 2014;80(4):286-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2014.10.001
  8. Chan JK, Xing GH, Xu Y, Liang Y, Chen LX, Wu SC, et al. Body loadings and health risk assessment of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans at an intensive electronic waste recycling site in China. Environ Sci Technol 2007; 41(22):7668-7674. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071492j
  9. Puckett J, Byster L, Westervelt S, Gutierrez R, Davis S, Hussain A, et al. Exporting harm: the high-tech trashing of Asia; 2012 [cited 2018 Jul 7]. Available from: https://noharm-uscanada.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/84/Exporting_Harm_Trashing_Asia.pdf.
  10. Chen A, Dietrich KN, Huo X, Ho SM. Developmental neurotoxicants in e-waste: an emerging health concern. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119(4):431-438. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002452
  11. Frazzoli C, Orisakwe OE, Dragone R, Mantovani A. Diagnostic health risk assessment of electronic waste on the general population in developing countries' scenarios. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2010;30(6):388-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.12.004
  12. Needhidasan S, Samuel M, Chidambaram R. Electronic waste-an emerging threat to the environment of urban India. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2014;12:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-36
  13. Ross EJ, Graham DL, Money KM, Stanwood GD. Developmental consequences of fetal exposure to drugs: what we know and what we still must learn. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015;40(1):61-87. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2014.147
  14. United States Department of Labor. Evaluation of a solid sorbent passive dosimeter for collecting mercury vapor; 1989 [cited 2017 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/inorganic/id140/id140bkr.html.
  15. Toora BD, Rajagopal G. Measurement of United States creatinine by Jaffe's reaction--determination of concentration of sodium hydroxide required for maximum color development in standard, urine and protein free filtrate of serum. Indian J Exp Biol 2002;40(3):352-354.
  16. Ham GA. Determination of mercury in blood and urine by cold vapor AAS using the VGA-77 [cited 2017 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.gbcpolska.pl/agilent_przyrzady/aas/pdfy/aa126_oznaczanie_rteci_Hg_we_krwi.pdf.
  17. Pollution Control Department, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Thailand state of pollution report 2010; 2012 [cited 2018 Jul 7]. Available from: http://infofile.pcd.go.th/mgt/Report_Eng2553.pdf.
  18. Association Advancing Occupational and Environmental Health. Mercury, elemental: BEI (R); 2013 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.acgih.org/forms/store/ProductFormPublic/mercury-elemental-bei-r-7th-edition-documentation.
  19. Babu BR, Parande AK, Basha CA. Electrical and electronic waste: a global environmental problem. Waste Manag Res 2007;25(4): 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07076941
  20. Decharat S. Mercury exposure among garbage workers in Southern Thailand. Saf Health Work 2012;3(4):268-277. https://doi.org/10.5491/SHAW.2012.3.4.268
  21. Julander A, Lundgren L, Skare L, Grander M, Palm B, Vahter M, et al. Formal recycling of e-waste leads to increased exposure to toxic metals: an occupational exposure study from Sweden. Environ Int 2014;73:243-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.07.006
  22. Needhidasan S, Samuel M, Chidambaram R. Electronic waste - an emerging threat to the environment of urban India. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2014;12(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-36
  23. Hansen JC, Danscher G. Organic mercury: an environmental threat to the health of dietary-exposed societies? Rev Environ Health 1997;12(2):107-116.
  24. Jafari MJ, Shafiei B, Azari MR, Movahhedi M. Occupational exposure to welding fumes using different ventilation scenarios. Int J Occup Hyg 2010;2(1):1-5.
  25. OSHwiki. Protective clothing against chemical and biological hazards [cited 2017 Dec 25]. Available from: https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Protective_clothing_against_chemical_and_biological_hazards#Protective_clothing_against_biological_hazards.
  26. Rice KM, Walker EM Jr, Wu M, Gillette C, Blough ER. Environmental mercury and its toxic effects. J Prev Med Public Health 2014;47(2):74-83. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2014.47.2.74
  27. Wilson D. Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). WEEE (e-waste) in consumer electronic devices; 2016 [cited 2018 Jul 15]. Available from: https://ewaste.ee. washington.edu/students/electronic-devices/.
  28. Huo X, Peng L, Xu X, Zheng L, Qiu B, Qi Z, et al. Elevated blood lead levels of children in Guiyu, an electronic waste recycling town in China. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115(7):1113-1117. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9697
  29. Grant K, Goldizen FC, Sly PD, Brune MN, Neira M, van den Berg M, et al. Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health 2013;1(6):e350-e361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70101-3
  30. Monika, Kishore J. E-waste management: as a challenge to public health in India. Indian J Community Med 2010;35(3): 382-385. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.69251
  31. International Labor Organization. The global impact of e-waste: addressing the challenges [cited 2017 Dec 25]. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---sector/documents/publication/wcms_196105.pdf.
  32. Eyeson J, House I, Yang YH, Warnakulasuriya KA. Relationship between mercury levels in blood and urine and complaints of chronic mercury toxicity from amalgam restorations. Br Dent J 2010;208(4):E7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.181
  33. Langworth S, Sallsten G, Barregard L, Cynkier I, Lind ML, Soderman E. Exposure to mercury vapor and impact on health in the dental profession in Sweden. J Dent Res 1997;76(7): 1397-1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760071001
  34. Rowland AS, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Shore DL, Shy CM, Wilcox AJ. The effect of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the fertility of female dental assistants. Occup Environ Med 1994;51(1):28-34. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.51.1.28

Cited by

  1. Characterization of inhalation exposure to gaseous elemental mercury during artisanal gold mining and e-waste recycling through combined stationary and personal passive sampling vol.23, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0em00494d