DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Guidelines for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Korea: Past Obstacles and Future Perspectives

  • Choo, Suk Jung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Shinn, Sung Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cheju Halla General Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Kyung Hwan (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Wook Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Sam-Sae (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sak (Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.10.30
  • Accepted : 2018.02.14
  • Published : 2018.08.05

Abstract

Background: Analyses of the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in most countries have been based on outcomes obtained in accordance with national practice guidelines and monitoring protocols. The purpose of this study is to share our experience regarding the process for establishing guidelines and monitoring protocols for the use of TAVR in Korea, in the hopes that it may be helpful to others undergoing a similar process in their own country. Methods: The Korean guidelines for TAVR were established on June 1, 2015 in through a tri-party agreement involving the Department of Health and Welfare, the Korean Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and the Korean Society of Cardiology. We agreed to monitor the guidelines transparently and to exchange opinions regarding amendments or continuation of its contents after 3 years of monitoring. Results: The monitoring meetings were not held as regularly as agreed, and monitoring was also made difficult by insufficient and incomplete data. Nevertheless, during the meetings, measures to improve the monitoring process were discussed, and accordingly, an agreement was made to continue the monitoring process, with the aim of completing data collection by 2018. Conclusion: Compliance with guidelines is critical for assessing the efficacy and safety of TAVR. Moreover, the TAVR monitoring process must be properly conducted for an accurate evaluation to be made. Any country planning to introduce TAVR may encounter difficulties with regards to the optimal initiation strategy and subsequent monitoring. Nevertheless, continued efforts should be made to persuade the government and the corresponding medical societies to facilitate the optimal application of TAVR.

Keywords

References

  1. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 2002;106:3006-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000047200.36165.B8
  2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Decision memo for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (CAG-00430N). Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2012.
  3. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Vahanian A, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012;33:2451-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109
  4. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Society Association. Implementation facility standards in council for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Society Association [Internet]. Osaka: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Society Association; 2013 [cited 2013 Jul 18]. Available from: http://j-tavr.com/guideline.html.
  5. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2017;135:e1159-95. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000503
  6. Webb JG, Wood DA. Current status of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:483-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.071
  7. Otto CM, Kumbhani DJ, Alexander KP, et al. 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of adults with aortic stenosis: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:1313-46.
  8. Pollak PM, Mack MJ, Holmes DR Jr. Quality, economics, and national guidelines for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014;56:610-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2014.03.001