Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Making of a Nation's Citizen Diplomats: Culture-learning in International Volunteer Training Program

  • Lee, Kyung Sun (Department of Radio-Television-Film, The University of Texas at Austin)
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examines Korea's international development volunteer program as a citizen diplomacy initiative. Informed by a cultural perspective of transmission and relational models of public diplomacy, I examine the ways in which volunteer training incorporates cultural-learning into its program. The study finds that volunteer training is largely based on an instrumentalist approach to culture that places emphasis on learning the "explicit" side of culture, such as Korean traditional dance, art, and food as a strategy to promote the country's national image. In contrast, much less covered in the training program is a relational approach to culture-learning that is guided by a reflexive understanding of the "implicit" side of culture, or the values and beliefs that guide the worldviews and behavior of both volunteers and host constituents. Whereas the value of the volunteer program as a citizen diplomacy initiative is in its potential to build relationships based on two-way engagement, its conception of culture is mostly guided by that of the transmission model of public diplomacy. Based on the findings, this study calls for an integrated approach to culture-learning in volunteer training program to move the citizen diplomacy initiative forward.

Keywords

References

  1. Abidin, C. (2017). influencer extravaganza: Commercial "lifestyle" microcelebrities in Singapore. In L. Hjorth, H. Horst, A. Galloway, & G. Bell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital ethnographies (pp. 158-168). New York, NY: Routledge.
  2. Ang, I., Isar, Y. R., & Mar, P. (2015). Cultural diplomacy: beyond the national interest? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(4), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1042474
  3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity al large: cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  4. Arndt, R. T. (2005). The first resort of kings: American cultural diplomacy in the twentieth century. Potomac Books, Inc.
  5. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33(1), 1-4.
  6. Barker, C. M. (2000). Education for international understanding and global competence. Presented at the Carnegie Corporation Convention New York.
  7. Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Tha ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
  8. Clarke, D. (2016). Theorising the role of cultural products in cultural diplomacy from a Cultural Studies perspective. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2014.958481
  9. Cowan, G., & Arsenault, A. (2008). Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 10-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311863
  10. Deardorff, D. K. (2008). Intercultural competence: A definition, model, and implications for education abroad. In V. Savicki (Ed.), Developing intercultural competence and transformation: Theory, research, and application in international education (pp. 32-52).
  11. Dutta-Bergman, M. (2006). U.S. public diplomacy in the Middle East: A critical cultural approach. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 30(2), 102-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859905285286
  12. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
  13. Evanoff, R. J. (2004). Universalist, relativist, and constructivist approaches to intercultural ethics. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28(5), 439-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.08.002
  14. Georgeou, N., & Engel, S. (2011). The Impact of Neoliberalism and New Managerialism on Development Volunteering: An Australian Case Study. Australian Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2011.567970
  15. Golan, G. J. (2013). An integrated approach to public diplomacy.
  16. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language (Vol. 3). Doubleday New York. Retrieved from http://www.embaedu.com/member/medias/212/2012/12/201212516502017767.pdf
  17. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
  18. Hong, K. (2014). Nation branding of Korea. In H.-K. Lee & L. Lim (Eds.), Cultural policies in East Asia: Dynamics between the state, arts and creative industries (pp. 69-84). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Irye, A. (n/d). Cultural relations and policies. Retrieved February 28, 2017, from http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/A-D/Cultural-Relations-and-Policies.html
  20. Iwabuchi, K. (2015). Resilient borders and cultural diversity: Internationalism, brand nationalism, and multiculturalism in Japan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  21. Jung, M. S. (2017, December 20). Korea-Vietnam 25th year of diplomatic relations: "Disdain toward Vietnamese wives a worse act than participation in the Vietnamese War." Korea Times. Retrieved from www.hankookilbo.com/v/80d237fc812f476d8773409d9ff36c94
  22. Kang, H. (2015). Contemporary cultural diplomacy in South Korea: explicit and implicit approaches. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21(4), 433-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1042473
  23. KOICA. (2011). 2010 Report on international volunteer program pre-departure training. Seongnam, South Korea: KOICA.
  24. KOICA. (2016). World Friends Korea: Statistical Report, 2015. Seongnam, South Korea: KOICA.
  25. KOICA. (2017). Report on WFK International Volunteer Program Domesting Training Plan, 2017 (No. 2017-03-023). Seongnam, South Korea.
  26. KOICA volunteers visit Korea's cultural sites. (2014). Retrieved June 1, 2018, from https://blog.naver.com/worldfriendsyw/221040416782
  27. KOICA World Friends Operation Team. (2018). A guide to (fun and easy) field project. Seongnam, South Korea: KOICA.
  28. KOICA World Friends Training Center. (2012). 2011 Report on World Friends Koica Volunteer Program pre-departure training. Seongnam, South Korea.
  29. Lee, C. H., Lee, M. P., Shin, J. A., & Song, J. A. (2011). WFK domestic training program reform research, Vol. 1. KOICA Volunteer Domestic Training. Seongnam, South Korea: KOICA.
  30. Lough, B. (2010). Predictors of Intercultural Competence Among International Volunteers. Washington University in St. Louis. Retrieved from http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1213&context=etd
  31. Lough, B. J. (2011). International volunteers' perceptions of intercultural competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(4), 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.06.002
  32. Matveev, A. V., & Milter, R. G. (2004). The value of intercultural competence for performance of multicultural teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 10(5/6), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590410556827
  33. Mueller, S. (2009). The nexus of US public diplomacy and citizen diplomacy. In N. Snow & P. M. Taylor (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public diplomacy (pp. 101-107). New York: Routledge.
  34. Nagata, A. L. (2005). Promoting self-reflexivity in intercultural education. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 8, 139-167.
  35. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=sFNfYvNtw5AC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=soft+power:+the+means+to+success&ots=7rT0mbbeJi&sig=ZweZLg9Ev3EEcUTOwZCXoWsYDJg
  36. Nye, J. S., & Kim, Y. (2013). Soft power and the Korean Wave. In Y. Kim (Ed.), The Korean Wave: Korean media go global (pp. 31-42). New York, NY: Routledge.
  37. Pamment, J. (2015). Media Influence, Ontological Transformation, and Social Change: Conceptual Overlaps Between Development Communication and Public Diplomacy. Communication Theory, 25(2), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12064
  38. Paschalidis, G. (2009). Exporting National Culture: Histories of Cultural Institutes Abroad. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15, 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630902811148
  39. Payne, G. J. (2009). Reflections on Public Diplomacy: People-to-People Communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 579-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209347632
  40. Presidential Council of Nation Branding. (2013). A reliable and dignified Korea: Policy Report (Nation Branding White Papers No. 12-B552472-000063-01). Seoul, Korea.
  41. Schech, S. (2016). International volunteering in development assistance: Partnership, public diplomacy, or communication for development? In Voice and matter: Communication, development and the cultural turn (pp. 87-99). Goteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.
  42. Sherraden, M. S., Lough, B., & McBride, A. M. (2008). Effects of international volunteering and service: Individual and institutional predictors. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-008-9072-x
  43. Storti, C. (2017). Intercultural Training in the Peace Corps: The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, 1-10.
  44. Storti, C., & Bennhold-Samaan, L. (1997). Culture matters: The Peace Corps cross-cultural workbook (ICE Pub. No. T0087). Washington, D.C.: Peace Corps Information Collection and Exchange.
  45. U.S. Department of State. (2005). Cultural diplomacy, the linchpin of public diplomacy: Report of the Advisory Committee on Cultural Diplomacy. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/culturaldiploUS.pdf
  46. WFK Training Center. (2014). Report on 2013 WFK KOICA volunteer pre-departure training. Seongnam, South Korea: KOICA.
  47. Wood, J. T. (2015). Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters. Nelson Education.
  48. World Friends Korea. (2014). Introducing the Vision of WFK. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from http://www.worldfriendskorea.or.kr/view/intro.vision.do
  49. Yashima, T. (2010). The effects of international volunteer work experiences on intercultural competence of Japanese youth. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(3), 268-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.12.003
  50. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Third Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  51. Zaharna, R. S. (2009). Mapping the spectrum of public diplomacy initiatives: Information and relational communication frameworks. In N. Snow & P. M. Taylor (Eds.) (pp. 86-100). New York, NY: Routledge.
  52. Zaharna, R. S. (2012). The cultural awakening in public diplomacy. Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.

Cited by

  1. Two-Way Engagement in Public Diplomacy : The Case of Talk Talk Korea vol.17, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.20879/acr.2020.17.3.115
  2. Hybridization of Chinese international development volunteering: Evidence from three state‐funded programmes vol.40, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12544