Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diameter of the Solid Component in Subsolid Nodules on Low-Dose Unenhanced Chest Computed Tomography: Measurement Accuracy for the Prediction of Invasive Component in Lung Adenocarcinoma

  • Ahn, Hyungwoo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Hee (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jihang (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jeongjae (Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Junghoon (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Won (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.08.16
  • Accepted : 2017.10.24
  • Published : 2018.06.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To determine if measurement of the diameter of the solid component in subsolid nodules (SSNs) on low-dose unenhanced chest computed tomography (CT) is as accurate as on standard-dose enhanced CT in prediction of pathological size of invasive component of lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: From February 2012 to October 2015, 114 SSNs were identified in 105 patients that underwent low-dose unenhanced and standard-dose enhanced CT pre-operatively. Three radiologists independently measured the largest diameter of the solid component. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess inter-reader agreement. We estimated measurement differences between the size of solid component and that of invasive component. We measured diagnostic accuracy of the prediction of invasive adenocarcinoma using a size criterion of a solid component ${\geq}6mm$, and compared them using a generalized linear mixed model. Results: Inter-reader agreement was excellent (ICC, 0.84-0.89). The mean ${\pm}$ standard deviation of absolute measurement differences between the solid component and invasive component was $4{\pm}4mm$ in low-dose unenhanced CT and $5{\pm}4mm$ in standard-dose enhanced CT. Diagnostic accuracy was 81.3% (95% confidence interval, 76.7-85.3%) in low-dose unenhanced CT and 76.6% (71.8-81.0%) in standard-dose enhanced CT, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.130). Conclusion: Measurement of the diameter of the solid component of SSNs on low-dose unenhanced chest CT was as accurate as on standard-dose enhanced CT for predicting the invasive component. Thus, low-dose unenhanced CT may be used safely in the evaluation of patients with SSNs.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Health & Welfare

References

  1. Goo JM, Park CM, Lee HJ. Ground-glass nodules on chest CT as imaging biomarkers in the management of lung adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:533-543 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5813
  2. Rami-Porta R, Bolejack V, Crowley J, Ball D, Kim J, Lyons G, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:990-1003 https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000559
  3. Travis WD, Asamura H, Bankier AA, Beasley MB, Detterbeck F, Flieder DB, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for coding T categories for subsolid nodules and assessment of tumor size in part-solid tumors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:1204-1223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.025
  4. Lee HY, Choi YL, Lee KS, Han J, Zo JI, Shim YM, et al. Pure ground-glass opacity neoplastic lung nodules: histopathology, imaging, and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:W224-W233 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11819
  5. Hwang EJ, Park CM, Ryu Y, Lee SM, Kim YT, Kim YW, et al. Pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as part-solid groundglass nodules: is measuring solid component size a better prognostic indicator? Eur Radiol 2015;25:558-567 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3441-1
  6. Zhang Y, Qiang JW, Ye JD, Ye XD, Zhang J. High resolution CT in differentiating minimally invasive component in early lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2014;84:236-241 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.02.008
  7. Austin JH, Garg K, Aberle D, Yankelevitz D, Kuriyama K, Lee HJ, et al. Radiologic implications of the 2011 classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Radiology 2013;266:62-71 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120240
  8. Cohen JG, Reymond E, Lederlin M, Medici M, Lantuejoul S, Laurent F, et al. Differentiating pre- and minimally invasive from invasive adenocarcinoma using CT-features in persistent pulmonary part-solid nodules in Caucasian patients. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:738-744 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.031
  9. Chae HD, Park CM, Park SJ, Lee SM, Kim KG, Goo JM. Computerized texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Radiology 2014;273:285-293 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132187
  10. Lee SM, Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Wi JY, Kang CH. Invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas versus preinvasive lesions appearing as ground-glass nodules: differentiation by using CT features. Radiology 2013;268:265-273 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120949
  11. Lee KH, Goo JM, Park SJ, Wi JY, Chung DH, Go H, et al. Correlation between the size of the solid component on thinsection CT and the invasive component on pathology in small lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as ground-glass nodules. J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:74-82 https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000019
  12. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017;284:228-243 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161659
  13. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1053-1057 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781053
  14. Kim H, Park CM, Koh JM, Lee SM, Goo JM. Pulmonary subsolid nodules: what radiologists need to know about the imaging features and management strategy. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014;20:47-57
  15. Scholten ET, Jacobs C, van Ginneken B, van Riel S, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, et al. Detection and quantification of the solid component in pulmonary subsolid nodules by semiautomatic segmentation. Eur Radiol 2015;25:488-496 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3427-z
  16. Kim H, Park CM, Chae HD, Lee SM, Goo JM. Impact of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction on pulmonary nodule measurements at chest CT: a phantom study. Diagn Interv Radiol 2015;21:459-465 https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2015.14541
  17. Li B, Behrman RH. Comment on the "report of AAPM TG 204: size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations" [report of AAPM TG 204, 2011]. Med Phys 2012;39:4613-4614; author reply 4615-4616 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4725756
  18. Brady SL, Kaufman RA. Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology 2012;265:832-840 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120131
  19. McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, Geise R, Gould B, Keat N, et al. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Virginia: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2008:1-34
  20. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM, Beasley MB, et al. The 2015 world health organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1243-1260 https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630
  21. de Jong PA, Leiner T, Lammers JW, Gietema HA. Can low-dose unenhanced chest CT be used for follow-up of lung nodules? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:777-780 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7577
  22. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47:27-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006
  23. Silverman JD, Paul NS, Siewerdsen JH. Investigation of lung nodule detectability in low-dose 320-slice computed tomography. Med Phys 2009;36:1700-1710 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3112363
  24. Yu L, Liu X, Leng S, Kofler JM, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Qu M, et al. Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 2009;1:65-84 https://doi.org/10.2217/iim.09.5
  25. Hein PA, Romano VC, Rogalla P, Klessen C, Lembcke A, Bornemann L, et al. Variability of semiautomated lung nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose CT: comparison with nodule volumetry on standard-dose CT. J Digit Imaging 2010;23:8-17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9157-5
  26. Sui X, Meinel FG, Song W, Xu X, Wang Z, Wang Y, et al. Detection and size measurements of pulmonary nodules in ultra-low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction compared to low dose CT. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:564-570 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.013
  27. Christe A, Torrente JC, Lin M, Yen A, Hallett R, Roychoudhury K, et al. CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:623-630 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5288
  28. Hein PA, Romano VC, Rogalla P, Klessen C, Lembcke A, Dicken V, et al. Linear and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules at different CT dose levels - intrascan and interscan analysis. Rofo 2009;181:24-31 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1027874
  29. Siegelman JW, Supanich MP, Gavrielides MA. Pulmonary nodules with ground-glass opacity can be reliably measured with low-dose techniques regardless of iterative reconstruction: results of a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:1242-1247 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13820
  30. Park HS, Lee S, Haam S, Lee GD. Effect of formalin fixation and tumour size in small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective, single-centre study. Histopathology 2017;71:437-445 https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13237
  31. Yoo RE, Goo JM, Hwang EJ, Yoon SH, Lee CH, Park CM, et al. Retrospective assessment of interobserver agreement and accuracy in classifications and measurements in subsolid nodules with solid components less than 8mm: which window setting is better? Eur Radiol 2017;27:1369-1376 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4495-z
  32. Mao H, Labh K, Han F, Jiang S, Yang Y, Sun X. Diagnosis of the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground glass opacities on high-resolution computed tomography. Thorac Cancer 2016;7:129-135 https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12269
  33. Collins J, Stern EJ. Ground-glass opacity at CT: the ABCs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:355-367 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.2.9242736
  34. Goodman LR, Gulsun M, Washington L, Nagy PG, Piacsek KL. Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:989-994 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1821
  35. Cohen JG, Goo JM, Yoo RE, Park SB, van Ginneken B, Ferretti GR, et al. The effect of late-phase contrast enhancement on semi-automatic software measurements of CT attenuation and volume of part-solid nodules in lung adenocarcinomas. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:1174-1180 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.027
  36. Kim H, Park CM, Song YS, Sunwoo L, Choi YR, Kim JI, et al. Measurement variability of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules on same-day repeat CT: what is the threshold to determine true nodule growth during follow-up? PLoS One 2016;11:e0148853 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148853
  37. Ahn H, Lee KW, Lee KH, Kim J, Kim K, Chung JH, et al. Effect of computed tomography window settings and reconstruction plane on 8th edition T-stage classification in patients with lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as a subsolid nodule. Eur J Radiol 2018;98:130-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.11.015

Cited by

  1. Effect of Slab Thickness on the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules by Use of CT Maximum and Minimum Intensity Projection vol.213, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.19.21325
  2. Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology Based on the Citation Frequency vol.21, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1322