Abstract
This paper compares the differences in management performance in the logistics market and analyzes the differences in business characteristics depending on the industry types. In addition, the effects of industry types and business characteristics on management performance are examined. The analysis method used is ANOVA and K-means clustering. The implication of the study are as follows. First, in the logistics market in Japan, there was a difference in management performance among the types of industry. The warehousing service type had the highest profitability and stability among all the industry types. Second, differences in business characteristics by industry types were tested. It was found that offshore cargo transportation type was more capital intensive than the other types. In addition, warehousing service type had higher business leadership and credit transaction than others. Third, industry types and clusters based on business characteristics had a significant impact on management performance through interaction effects. For the profitability variables in detail, other clusters had a significant effect between transportation types(onshore and offshore cargo) and warehousing service type. On the other hand, in stability variables, one cluster was effective in all types, which is a characteristic that lowers both capital intensity and business leadership.
본 연구는 물류시장의 업종 간의 경영성과 차이를 비교하는 동시에 물류기업의 사업특성 차이를 분석하였다. 나아가 업종과 사업특성의 차이가 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 검정하였다. 분석 방법으로는 분산분석, 군집분석을 이용하였고, 연구의 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째. 일본의 물류시장은 업종 간 경영성과 차이가 나타났고, 창고서비스업이 타 업종에 비해 수익성과 안정성이 높았다. 둘째, 업종별 사업행동의 차이가 나타났고, 타 업종에 비해 해상화물운송업은 자본집약도가 높았고, 창고서비스업은 사업선도력과 신용거래도가 높았다. 마지막으로 업종과 사업특성 군집의 두 요인은 경영성과에 미치는 상호작용이 유의미하게 검정되었는데, 수익성에 있어 화물운송업과 창고서비스업의 사업특성의 작용이 달랐다. 반면, 안정성에 있어 전 업종은 공통적으로 자본집약도를 낮추고 사업선도력을 재고하는 사업특성이 유효하게 작용하였다.