DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the metrical indicator of the major projects of public organizations -Focused on the case of Korea Land and Geospatial InformatiX Co.-

공공기관 주요사업 계량지표에 관한 연구 -한국국토정보공사 사례를 중심으로-

  • 정종대 (청주대학교 사회과학대학 지적학과) ;
  • 김영학 (청주대학교 사회과학대학 지적학과)
  • Received : 2018.05.04
  • Accepted : 2018.06.27
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The Ministry of Strategy and Finance of South Korea accesses public organizations annually for increasing outcomes with effective and clear managements. The management assessment is categorized into the business management applied all organizations and the main business assessed by purposes and characters of organizations. This study analyzes metrical indexes of main businesses with using the logic model and suggests the direction of developing metrical indexes of organizations. Metrical indexes of the Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation in 2017 were analyzed to develop indexes. The results indicates that metrical indexes of the Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation are mainly consisted of the commitment and process. The logic model was suggested to analyze proprieties of metrical indexes of the main business. This study shows that organizations develop metrical indexes of the main business with classifying that these are from calculation indexes or result indexes. Thus, this study suggests that organizations consider result indexes based on the logic model for developing metrical indexes of the main business.

정부는 공공기관의 효율적이고 투명한 운영을 통해 사업성과를 제고하기 위하여 매년 기획재정부주관으로 공공기관 경영평가를 진행하고 있다. 공공기관 경영평가는 경영관리범주와 주요사업범주로 구분되는데 경영관리범주는 평가 대상 기관 공통으로 적용되고 주요사업과 주요사업 계량지표는 기관의 설립목적과 특성에 따라 자율적으로 선정하여 평가를 받고 있다. 공공기관의 주요사업은 기관의 설립목적을 대표하므로 수행성과가 매우 중요하므로 본 연구는 공공기관의 주요사업 계량지표를 로직모델을 통해 살펴보고 지표의 특성을 알아보고 공공기관의 주요사업 계량지표 개발 방향을 제시하고자 한다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 연구대상은 위탁집행형 준정부기관인 한국국토정보공사의 주요사업으로 한정하고 범위는 2017년도 경영평가 편람을 기준으로 설정하였다. 연구결과는 첫째, 한국국토정보공사 주요사업 계량지표는 투입, 과정, 산출 지표 위주로 구성되어 있으며 둘째, 공공기관에서 제시한 주요사업 계량지표는 적정성을 알아보는 방법으로 로직모델을 제시하였으며 셋째, 공공기관의 주요사업 계량지표를 투입, 과정, 산출지표가 아닌 결과지표로 선정하는 방안을 제시하였다. 따라서 본 연구에서 공공기관의 주요사업 계량지표의 선정과 검증에 필요한 방법론 즉 로직모델을 통해 공공기관의 주요사업 계량지표가 결과지표 중심으로 개발되어야 할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Strategy and Finance. 2017. 2017 Executive Assessment Manual.
  2. Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation. 2017. 2017 Management Performance Report.
  3. Kwak CK. 2003. Role and operational performance of management evaluation system for controlling inefficiency of government-invested institutions. Public Enterprise Report. 15(1):49-91.
  4. Kwak CK. 2010. Public Institutional Issue: Evaluation and Development Direction of Public Institution Management Evaluation. KIPF Public Institution Trend. 2:22-53.
  5. Park SH. 2009. Recent Issues and Tasks of Public Management Evaluation System. Conference of the Korean Association for Public Administration. p. 1547-1564.
  6. Park YK, Song YR. 2007. A Study on the Problems and Improvement Measures of Public Enterprise Management Indicators. Social Science Research. 13:5-30.
  7. An SC. 2014. A Study on the Management Evaluation Results and Institutional Characteristics of Public Institutions. Journal of the Korean Management Association. 27(6):835-859.
  8. Yoo H, Bae YS, Lee WH. 2011. Public Enterprise. Bobmunsa.
  9. Oh YM. 2011. Analysis of the Factors which Affect Management Performance Evaluation System used in Public Institutions. Seoul National University.
  10. Lee YG. 2007. A Study on the Management Evaluation Index of the Local Government Organizations. Korean Journal of Policy Studies. 7(2):23-44.
  11. Lee HW. 2005. Study on Applicability of BSC as the Performance Appraisal Method of the Government Investment Organization. Social Science Research. 11(2):81-88.
  12. Jang DH, La hm. 2011. The Analysis of The Linkage of Local Enterprises' Management Evaluation Index. The Korea Local Administration Review. 25(2):181-208.
  13. Ji EK, Jong HS, Jeong HM. 2012. Program Evaluation and Logic Model. Hakjisa.
  14. Ji EK. 2012. The possibility of the using and limitations of logic model and BSC model for measuring performance in non-profit organizations. Journal of Social Science. 31(1):385-401.
  15. Jo T. 2008. A Study on Performance Evaluation System of Quasi-Governmental Bodies Its Change and Reform Proposal. The Korean Association for Governance. 15(3): 155-178 https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2008.15.3.007
  16. Jo T, Lee CG. 2010. A Study on the Validity of Quantitative Index in the Public Body Management Evaluation. The Journal of the Korean Association for Governance. 17(3):239-270.
  17. Niven, P. (2003). Balanced Scorecard Step by Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, p. 156