References
- Newman GV. Clinical treatment with bonded plastic attachments. Am J Orthod 1971;60:600-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90199-0
- Sondhi A. Efficient and effective indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:352-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70252-0
- Deahl ST, Salome N, Hatch JP, Rugh JD. Practice-based comparison of direct and indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:738-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.037
- Shimizu RH, Grando KG, Shimizu IA, Andriguetto AR, Melo ACM, Witters EL. Assessment of shear bond strength of brackets bonded by direct and indirect techniques: An in vitro study. Dental Press J Orthod 2012;17:23.e1-7.
- Eliades T, Gioka C, Heim M, Eliades G, Makou M. Color stability of orthodontic adhesive resins. Angle Orthod 2004;74:391-3.
- Nojima LI, Araujo AS, Alves Junior M. Indirect orthodontic bonding--a modified technique for improved efficiency and precision. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20:109-17. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.109-117.sar
- Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
- Stober T, Gilde H, Lenz P. Color stability of highly filled composite resin materials for facings. Dent Mater 2001;17:87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00065-8
- Gegauff AG, Rosenstiel SF, Langhout KJ, Johnston WM. Evaluating tooth color change from carbamide peroxide gel. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:65-72.
- Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:514-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70171-4
- Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT. Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci 2011;53:273-82. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.273
- Reynolds IR, von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding in orthodontics: a comparison of attachments. Br J Orthod 1977;4:65-9. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.4.2.65
- Hellak A, Ebeling J, Schauseil M, Stein S, Roggendorf M, Korbmacher-Steiner H. Shear bond strength of three orthodontic bonding systems on enamel and restorative materials. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016: 6307107.
- Linn BJ, Berzins DW, Dhuru VB, Bradley TG. A comparison of bond strength between direct- and indirect-bonding methods. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:289-94.
- Yi GK, Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:577-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00503-1
- Menini A, Cozzani M, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Cozzani P, Gandini P. A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial. Prog Orthod 2014;15:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0070-9
- Daub J, Berzins DW, Linn BJ, Bradley TG. Bond strength of direct and indirect bonded brackets after thermocycling. Angle Orthod 2006;76:295-300.
- Polat O, Karaman AI, Buyukyilmaz T. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths and in vivo analysis of bond survival of indirect-bonding resins. Angle Orthod 2004;74:405-9.
- Klocke A, Shi J, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2003;73:176-80.
- Miles PG, Weyant RJ. A comparison of two indirect bonding adhesives. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1019-23.
- Goracci C, Margvelashvili M, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a new self-adhering flowable resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:609-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0729-x
- Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod 1981;79:500-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(81)90462-0
- Kim SS, Park WK, Son WS, Ahn HS, Ro JH, Kim YD. Enamel surface evaluation after removal of orthodontic composite remnants by intraoral sand- blasting: a 3-dimensional surface profilometry study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:71-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.027
- Sigiliao LC, Marquezan M, Elias CN, Ruellas AC, Sant'Anna EF. Efficiency of different protocols for enamel clean-up after bracket debonding: an in vitro study. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.078-085.oar
- Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Tomkowski R, Tandecka K, Stepien P, Szatkiewicz T, Sporniak-Tutak K, et al. Effect of orthodontic debonding and residual adhesive removal on 3D enamel microroughness. PeerJ 2016;4:e2558. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2558
- Karan S, Kircelli BH, Tasdelen B. Enamel surface roughness after debonding. Angle Orthod 2010;80: 1081-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/012610-55.1
- Zachrisson BU, Arthun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1979;75:121-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90181-7
- Campbell PM. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 1995;65:103-10.
- Yannikakis SA, Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, Caroni C. Color stability of provisional resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:533-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70028-9
Cited by
- An interview with Lincoln Issamu Nojima vol.24, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.022-032.int
- Effects of adhesive systems at different temperatures on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets vol.13, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.016