한국재난정보학회 논문집 (Journal of the Society of Disaster Information)

  • 제14권2호
  • /
  • Pages.182-193
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1976-2208(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-5287(eISSN)
한국재난정보학회 (The Korean Society of Disaster Information)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

통행행태와 도시공간특성에 관한 위계적 분석 II

A Hierarchical Analysis on the Commuting Behaviors and Urban Spatial Characteristics II

  • Seo, Jong Gook (Department of Urban Policy and Administration, Incheon National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.05.29
  • 심사 : 2018.06.21
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적: 연구의 목적은 통행행태와 도시공간특성관계를 위계적으로 분석하는데 있다. 연구방법: 본 연구는 2010년 우리나라 83개 도시에 대한 통행행태와 도시공간특성과의 관계를 위계선형모형으로 분석하였다. 연구결과: 도시속성이 교통수단선택과 통행시간에 개인속성과 더불어 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 도시속성을 변화시키는 정책을 통해서 수단선택과 소요시간에 영향을 미치는 정도가 비교적 낮은 것으로 나타나 교통을 위해서 토지이용정책을 동원하는 정책효과는 이론적으로 있으나 그 규모에 대해서는 기대보다는 크지 않다. 결론: 고밀개발 또는 도시규모가 클수록 대중교통체계가 많이 공급되어 이용을 많이 하지만 승용차에 비해 시간이 많이 소요되는 단점을 극복하지 못하고 있다.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to analyze the relationship between travel behavior and urban spatial characteristics in a hierarchical manner. Method: This study analyzed the relationship between traffic patterns and urban spatial characteristics for 83 cities in Korea by using a hierarchical linear model. Results: It was found that the urban spatial characteristics influenced the choice of transportation mode and travel time with personal attributes. However, the degree of influence on the choice of the means and the time required is relatively low through the policy of changing the city attribute, so the policy effect of mobilizing the land use policy for the traffic is theoretically, but the scale is not bigger than expected. Conclusion: In high density or the bigger scale of the city, the mass transportation system is widely supplied and used, but it does not overcome the drawback that it takes more time than the autos.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 유정진 (2006), "위계적 선형모형의 이해와 활용," 아동학회지, 27(3): 169-187.
  2. 서종국 (1998), "도시공간구조변화와 통행행태의 변화에 관한 연구," 국토계획, 33(5): 167-182.
  3. 서종국 (2005), "정보화와 도시공간 및 행태의 변화에 관한 연구," 한국행정논집, 17(2): 291-311.
  4. 서종국 (2015), "통행행태와 도시공간특성에 관한 위계적 분석," 한국재난정보학회논문집,11(4): 506-514.
  5. Bhat, C. (1997), "Work Travel Mode Choice and Number of Non-work Commute Stops," Transportation Research Part B, 31(1): 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00016-1
  6. Bhat, C. (1998), "Analysis of Travel Mode and Departure Time Choice for Urban Shopping Trips," Transportation Research Part B, 32(6): 361-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00004-6
  7. Breheny, M. J. (1992a), "Sustainable Development and Urban Form: An Introduction," in M. J. Breheny (eds) Sustainable Development and Urban Form, Lodon: Pion Limited: 1-23.
  8. Breheny, M. J. (1992b), "The Contradictions of the Compact City: A Review," in M. J. Breheny (eds) Sustainable Development and Urban Form, Lodon: Pion Limited: 138-159.
  9. Cevero. R. (2002), "Built Environments and Mode Choice: Normative Framework," Transportation Research Part D, 7(4): 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4
  10. Cirillo, C. and K. Axhausen (2006), " Evidence on the Distribution of Value of Time Savings from a Six-week Diary," Transportation Research Part A, 40(5): 444-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.06.007
  11. Ewing, R. and Cevero, R. (2001), "Travel and Built Environment: A Synthesis," Transportation Research Record, 1780: 87-114. https://doi.org/10.3141/1780-10
  12. Frank, R., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., Lawton, T. K. (2008), "Urban Forn, Travel Time, and Cost Relationships with Tour Complexity and Mode Choice," Transportation, 35(1): 37-54.
  13. Giuliano, G. and K. Small (1991), "Subcenters in Los Angeles Region," Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21: 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90032-I
  14. Gordon, P. and H. W. Richardson (1996), "Beyond Polycentricity: The Dispersed Metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990", Journal of American Planning Association, 62(3), pp. 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975695
  15. Gordon, P. and H. W. Richardson (1997), "Are Compact Cities a Desireable Planning Goal?,"Journal of American Planning Association, 63:93-106.
  16. Gordon, P., H. W. Richardson and Gang Yu (1998), "Metropolitan and Non-metropolitan Employment Trends in the US: Recent Evidence and Implications," Urban Studies, 35(7):1037-1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098984475
  17. Newman, P. and J. Kenworthy (1992), "Is There a Role for Physical Planner?," Journal of American Planning Association, 58(3): 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975814
  18. Schwane, Tim, M. Dijst and F.M. Dieleman (2001b), "Urban form and travel time: micro level household attributes and residential context," Utrecht: Urban Research Centre Utrecht University.
  19. Seo, Jong Gook (2002), "Economic Structural Changes, Urban Form, and Commuting Patterns in the U.S. Metropolitan Area, Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 14(3): 739-763.
  20. Shen, J., Sakata, Y., and Hashimoto, Y. (2009), “The Influence of Environmental Deterioration and Network Improvement on Transport Modal Choice,” Environmental Science and Policy, 12(3), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.003