Journal of Gastric Cancer

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.134-141
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2093-582X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-5641(eISSN)
대한위암학회 (The Korean Gastric Cancer Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pancreatic Compression during Lymph Node Dissection in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: Possible Cause of Pancreatic Leakage

  • Ida, Satoshi (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Hiki, Naoki (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Ishizawa, Takeaki (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Kuriki, Yugo (Laboratory of Chemistry and Biology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo) ;
  • Kamiya, Mako (Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo) ;
  • Urano, Yasuteru (Laboratory of Chemistry and Biology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo) ;
  • Nakamura, Takuro (Division of Carcinogenesis, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Tsuda, Yasuo (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Kano, Yosuke (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Kumagai, Koshi (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Nunobe, Souya (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Ohashi, Manabu (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research) ;
  • Sano, Takeshi (Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.06
  • 심사 : 2018.05.26
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a serious and fatal complication of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Blunt trauma to the parenchyma of the pancreas can result from an assistant's forceps compressing and retracting the pancreas, which in turn may result in pancreatic juice leakage. However, no published studies have focused on blunt trauma to the pancreas during laparoscopic surgery. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between compression of the pancreas and pancreatic juice leakage in a swine model. Materials and Methods: Three female pigs were used in this study. The pancreas was gently compressed dorsally for 15 minutes laparoscopically with gauze grasped with forceps. Pancreatic juice leakage was visualized by fluorescence imaging after topical administration of chymotrypsin-activatable fluorophore in real time. Amylase concentrations in ascites collected at specified times was measured. In addition, pancreatic tissue was fixed with formalin, and the histology of the compressed sites was evaluated. Results: Fluorescence imaging enabled visualization of pancreatic juice leaking into ascites around the pancreas. Median concentrations of pancreatic amylase in ascites increased from 46 U/L preoperatively to 12,509 U/L 4 hours after compression. Histological examination of tissues obtained 4 hours after compression revealed necrotic pancreatic acinar cells extending from the surface to deep within the pancreas and infiltration of inflammatory cells. Conclusions: Pancreatic compression by the assistant's forceps can contribute to pancreatic juice leakage. These findings will help to improve the procedure for lymph node dissection around the pancreas during laparoscopic gastrectomy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hosono S, Arimoto Y, Ohtani H, Kanamiya Y. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:7676-7683. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i47.7676
  2. Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg 2012;255:446-456. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824682f4
  3. Yakoub D, Athanasiou T, Tekkis P, Hanna GB. Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it an alternative to the open approach? Surg Oncol 2009;18:322-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2008.08.006
  4. Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg 2012;256:39-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e
  5. Irino T, Hiki N, Ohashi M, Nunobe S, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. The Hit and Away technique: optimal usage of the ultrasonic scalpel in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2016;30:245-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4195-9
  6. Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Hiki N, Saka M, et al.JCOG Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer 2010;13:238-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-010-0565-0
  7. Fujita T, Ohta M, Ozaki Y, Takahashi Y, Miyazaki S, Harada T, et al. Collateral thermal damage to the pancreas by ultrasonic instruments during lymph node dissection in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 2015;8:281-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12177
  8. Obama K, Okabe H, Hosogi H, Tanaka E, Itami A, Sakai Y. Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications. Surgery 2011;149:15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.014
  9. Hiki N, Honda M, Etoh T, Yoshida K, Kodera Y, Kakeji Y, et al. Higher incidence of pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Real-world evidence from a nationwide prospective cohort study. Gastric Cancer 2018;21:162-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0764-z
  10. Debi U, Kaur R, Prasad KK, Sinha SK, Sinha A, Singh K. Pancreatic trauma: a concise review. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:9003-9011. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9003
  11. Kumagai K, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kamiya S, Tsujiura M, Ida S, et al. Impact of anatomical position of the pancreas on postoperative complications and drain amylase concentrations after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6114-3 [In press].
  12. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 2010;8:e1000412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412
  13. Urano Y, Asanuma D, Hama Y, Koyama Y, Barrett T, Kamiya M, et al. Selective molecular imaging of viable cancer cells with pH-activatable fluorescence probes. Nat Med 2009;15:104-109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1854
  14. Yamashita S, Sakabe M, Ishizawa T, Hasegawa K, Urano Y, Kokudo N. Visualization of the leakage of pancreatic juice using a chymotrypsin-activated fluorescent probe. Br J Surg 2013;100:1220-1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9185
  15. Mori K, Ishizawa T, Yamashita S, Kamiya M, Urano Y, Kokudo N. Intraoperative visualization of pancreatic juice leaking from the pancreatic stump in a swine model. Gastroenterology 2015;149:1334-1336. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.068
  16. Kono Y, Ishizawa T, Tani K, Harada N, Kaneko J, Saiura A, et al. Techniques of fluorescence cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for better delineation of the bile duct anatomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1005. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001005
  17. Kudo H, Ishizawa T, Tani K, Harada N, Ichida A, Shimizu A, et al. Visualization of subcapsular hepatic malignancy by indocyanine-green fluorescence imaging during laparoscopic hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2504-2508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3468-z
  18. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Jurkovich GJ, Champion HR, Gennarelli TA, et al. Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma 1990;30:1427-1429. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199011000-00035
  19. Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, Nunobe S, Kumagai K, Ida S, et al. “Pancreas-compressionless gastrectomy”: a novel laparoscopic approach for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:3331-3337. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5974-4
  20. Sano T, Sasako M, Katai H, Maruyama K. Amylase concentration of drainage fluid after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:1310-1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800840932

피인용 문헌

  1. Serum C-reactive protein level on first postoperative day can predict occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic gastrectomy vol.66, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.66.285
  2. Is the measurement of drain amylase content useful for predicting pancreas-related complications after gastrectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy? vol.26, pp.14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i14.1594
  3. Why minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer is minimally invasive? vol.4, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12346
  4. Therapeutic value of splenectomy to dissect splenic hilar lymph nodes for type 4 gastric cancer involving the greater curvature, compared with other types vol.23, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01072-6
  5. Postoperative pancreatic fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.4, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12398
  6. The impact of pancreas compression time during minimally invasive gastrectomy on the postoperative complications in gastric cancer vol.5, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12488