DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Korean Social Affective Visual Stimuli

한국형 사회적 정서 유발 시각 자극 개발

  • Seok, Bum Joon (Department of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Nambeom (Neuroscience Research Institute, Gacheon University) ;
  • Min, Kyung Ha (Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Dohyun (Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Seog Ju (Department of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 석범준 (삼성서울병원 정신건강의학과, 성균관대학교 의과대학 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 김남범 (가천의과학대학교 뇌과학연구소) ;
  • 민경하 (서울대학교병원 가정의학과) ;
  • 박도현 (서울대학교병원) ;
  • 김석주 (삼성서울병원 정신건강의학과, 성균관대학교 의과대학 정신건강의학교실)
  • Received : 2018.04.06
  • Accepted : 2018.06.11
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Objectives: The current study aims to develop Korean Social Affective Visual Stimuli (K-SAVS) to arouse social affect. Methods: K-SAVS is composed of pictures of social situations among East Asians. Each picture contains a negative, positive, or neutral affect. Positive and negative stimuli were presented to one group of subjects. Negative and neutral stimuli were presented to another group of subjects. All subjects were required to fill out Affective Valence and Arousal Manikin. Results: In the initial test, 18 positive affective stimuli pictures (1 set) and 36 negative affective stimuli pictures (2 sets) were chosen from 95 stimuli pictures. Positive affective stimuli pictures showed higher valence (p < 0.001) and lower arousal (p < 0.001) than negative affective stimuli pictures. In the confirmatory test, 18 neutral stimuli pictures (1 set) were additionally selected out of the total of 79 pictures of neutral stimuli pictures and the pictures used in the former experiment. Neutral stimuli pictures showed higher valence (p < 0.001) and lower arousal (p < 0.001) than negative affective stimuli pictures. Conclusion: K-SAVS can be a valid and useful tool for inducing specific social affects of Koreans.

목 적 : 본 연구의 목적은 한국인에게 적합한 사회적 정서를 유발하는 자극(한국형 사회적 정서 유발 시각 자극, Korean Social Affective Visual Stimuli, K-SAVS)을 개발하는 것이다. 방 법 : K-SAVS는 극동 아시아인이 등장하는 사회적 상황의 사진들로 구성되었다. 각 사진은 부정적 정서 자극, 긍정적 정서 자극, 혹은 중립 자극으로 구성하였다. 24명의 피험자에게 긍정적 자극과 부정적 자극을 보여주고 정서가 및 각성수준에 대한 자가 평가 마네킹 척도를 작성하게 한 후, 다른 24명의 피험자들에게 부정적 자극과 중립 자극을 보여주고 같은 척도를 작성하게 하였다. 결 과 : 1차 실험에서 95개의 자극 사진 중 긍정적 정서자극 사진 1개 세트, 부정적 정서 자극 사진 2개 세트를 선정하였다. 각 세트는 18개의 사진으로 이루어졌다. 긍정적 정서 자극은 부정적 정사 자극 사진에 비해 호감도는 높았으며 (p < 0.001) 흥분도는 낮았다(p < 0.001). 2차 실험에서는 1차 선정된 사진들과 중립 자극 사진을 포함하여 79개의 사진 중 중립 자극 사진 1개 세트를 선정하였다. 중립 자극은 호감도는 높았으며(p < 0.001) 흥분도는 낮았다(p < 0.001). 결 론 : K-SAVS는 한국인에게 특정한 사회적 정서를 유발하는데 유용하게 사용할 수 있는 시각 자극이라 할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alshamsi A, Pianesi F, Lepri B, Pentland A, Rahwan I. Beyond Contagion: Reality Mining Reveals Complex Patterns of Social Influence. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135740. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135740
  2. Azevedo RT, Macaluso E, Avenanti A, Santangelo V, Cazzato V, Aglioti SM. Their pain is not our pain: brain and autonomic correlates of empathic resonance with the pain of same and different race individuals. Hum Brain Mapp 2013;34:3168-3181. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22133
  3. Cheon BK, Im DM, Harada T, Kim JS, Mathur VA, Scimeca JM, et al. Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. Neuroimage 2011;57:642-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.031
  4. Dan-Glauser ES, Scherer KR. The Geneva affective picture database (GAPED): a new 730-picture database focusing on valence and normative significance. Behav Res Methods 2011;43:468-477. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0064-1
  5. Ekman P. What Scientists Who Study Emotion Agree About. Perspect Psychol Sci 2016;11:31-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615596992
  6. Frith CD. Social cognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008;363:2033-2039. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0005
  7. Gardener EK, Carr AR, Macgregor A, Felmingham KL. Sex differences and emotion regulation: an event-related potential study. PLoS One 2013;8:e73475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073475
  8. Gong X, Wang D. Applicability of the international affective picture System in Chinese older adults: A validation study. Psych J 2016;5:117-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.131
  9. Gruhn D, Scheibe S. Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the international affective picture system (IAPS): do ratings become more extreme with age? Behav Res Methods 2008;40:512-521. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.512
  10. Hofstede G. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. J Int Bus Stud 1983;14:75-89. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867
  11. Huang J, Xu D, Peterson BS, Hu J, Cao L, Wei N, et al. Affective reactions differ between Chinese and American healthy young adults: a cross-cultural study using the international affective picture system. BMC Psychiatry 2015;15:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0442-9
  12. Kang EH, Choi JE, Ham BJ, Seok JH, Lee KU, Kim W, et al. Development and standardization of modified self-assessment manikin for emotional valence and arousal manikin. Anxiety and Mood 2011;7:113-118.
  13. Kim SM, Kwon YJ, Jung SY, Kim MJ, Cho YS, Kim HT, et al. Development of the Korean facial emotion stimuli: Korea university facial expression collection 2nd edition. Front Psychol 2017;8:769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00769
  14. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida;2005.
  15. Lee KU, Kim J, Yeon B, Kim SH, Chae JH. Development and standardization of extended ChaeLee Korean facial expressions of emotions. Psychiatry Investig 2013;10:155-163. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2013.10.2.155
  16. Lench HC, Flores SA, Bench SW. Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: a meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. Psychol Bull 2011;137:834-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024244
  17. Lungu O, Potvin S, Tikasz A, Mendrek A. Sex differences in effective fronto-limbic connectivity during negative emotion processing. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015;62:180-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.08.012
  18. Marchewka A, Zurawski L, Jednorog K, Grabowska A. The nencki affective picture system (NAPS): introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behav Res Methods 2014;46:596-610. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1
  19. Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol Rev 2001;108:291-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
  20. Olsson A, Ochsner KN. The role of social cognition in emotion. Trends Cogn Sci 2008;12:65-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.010
  21. Umberson D, Montez JK. Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51 Suppl:S54-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501
  22. Usnich T, Spengler S, Sajonz B, Herold D, Bauer M, Bermpohl F. Perception of social stimuli in mania: an fMRI study. Psychiatry Res 2015;231:71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.10.019
  23. Weisberg J, Milleville SC, Kenworthy L, Wallace GL, Gotts SJ, Beauchamp MS, et al. Social perception in autism spectrum disorders: impaired category selectivity for dynamic but not static images in ventral temporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2014;24:37-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs276
  24. Yang Y, Jia J, Wu B, Tang J. Social role-aware emotion contagion in image social networks. Proceeding of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-16); 2016 Feb 12-17; Phoenix, USA. Palo Alto: AAAI Press;2016. p.65-71.