DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Endosaccular Treatment of Very Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms with Parent Artery Preservation : Single Center Experience with Long Term Follow-up

  • Huh, Chae Wook (Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jae Il (Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Chang Hwa (Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Tae Hong (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jae Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Kosin University Gaspel Hospital) ;
  • Ko, Jun Kyeung (Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.06.12
  • Accepted : 2017.08.31
  • Published : 2018.07.01

Abstract

Objective : Very large (20-25 mm) and giant (${\geq}25mm$) intracranial aneurysms have an extremely poor natural course, and treatment of these aneurysms remains a challenge for endovascular and surgical strategies. This study was undertaken to describe our experiences of endosaccular treatment of very large and giant intracranial aneurysms with parent artery preservation. Methods : From January 2005 to October 2016, twenty-four very large or giant aneurysms in 24 patients were treated by endosaccular coil embolization with parent artery preservation. Nine (37.5%) aneurysms were ruptured and 15 were unruptured, and of these 15, 11 were symptomatic cases and 4 were incidentally discovered. The cohort comprised 17 women and 7 men of mean age 58.5 years (range, 26-82). Mean aneurysm size was 26.0 mm (range, 20-39) and 13 of the 24 aneurysms were giant. Results : Immediate angiographic results were complete occlusion in nine (37.5%) cases, remnant neck in six (25.0%), and remnant sac in nine (37.5%). Overall procedural related morbidity and mortality rates were 12.5% and 4.2%, respectively. Angiographic follow-up was available in 16 patients (66.7%). Mean and median follow-up periods were 27.2 (range, 2-77) and 10.5 months, respectively. In 12 cases (12/16, 75%) stable occlusion was achieved, four cases (4/16, 25%) had recanalized, and two of these were retreated with additional coiling. At clinical follow-up of the nine ruptured cases, three patients (33.3%) achieved a good clinical outcome (Glasgow outcome scale [GOS] score of 4 or 5), two (22.2%) a poor outcome (GOS score of 2 or 3), and four patients (44.4%) expired (GOS 1). On the other hand, of the 15 unruptured cases, 13 patients (86.7%) achieved a good clinical outcome (GOS 4 or 5), one patient a poor outcome (GOS score of 2 or 3), and one patient expired (GOS 1). Conclusion : The present study shows endosaccular treatment of very large or giant intracranial aneurysms with parent artery preservation is both feasible and effective with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Keywords

References

  1. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, et al. : Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 267 : 858-868, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120099
  2. Becske T, Potts MB, Shapiro M, Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Saatci I, et al. : Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 127 : 81-88, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311
  3. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF : Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 44 : 442-447, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151
  4. Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Gonzalez LF, Dumont AS, Starke RM, Hasan D, et al. : Coiling of large and giant aneurysms: complications and longterm results of 334 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35 : 546-552, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3696
  5. el-Chalouhi N, Jabbour PM, Tjoumakaris SI, Starke RM, Dumont AS, Liu H, et al. : Treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: cost comparison of flow diversion and traditional embolization strategies. World Neurosurg 82 : 696-701, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.089
  6. Gao X, Liang G, Li Z, Wei X, Cao P : A single-centre experience and follow-up of patients with endovascular coiling of large and giant intra- cranial aneurysms with parent artery preservation. J Clin Neurosci 19 : 364-369, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.03.038
  7. Gruber A, Killer M, Bavinzski G, Richling B : Clinical and angiographic results of endosaccular coiling treatment of giant and very large intracranial aneurysms: a 7-year, single-center experience. Neurosurgery 45 : 793-803; discussion 803-804, 1999
  8. Ha SW, Jang SJ : Clinical analysis of giant intracranial aneurysms with endovascular embolization. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 14 : 22-28, 2012 https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2012.14.1.22
  9. Hauck EF, Welch BG, White JA, Replogle RE, Purdy PD, Pride LG, et al. : Stent/coil treatment of very large and giant unruptured ophthalmic and cavernous aneurysms. Surg Neurol 71 : 19-24; discussion 24, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2008.01.025
  10. Jahromi BS, Mocco J, Bang JA, Gologorsky Y, Siddiqui AH, Horowitz MB, et al. : Clinical and angiographic outcome after endovascular management of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 63 : 662-674; discussion 674-675, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000325497.79690.4C
  11. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, Boccardi E, Bonafe A, Cekirge S, et al. : International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36 : 108-115, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4111
  12. Kodama N, Suzuki J : Surgical treatment of giant aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev 5 : 155-160, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742678
  13. Leung GK, Tsang AC, Lui WM : Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review. Clin Neuroradiol 22 : 295-303, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-012-0178-6
  14. Li MH, Li YD, Fang C, Gu BX, Cheng YS, Wang YL, et al. : Endovascular treatment of giant or very large intracranial aneurysms with different modalities: an analysis of 20 cases. Neuroradiology 49 : 819-828, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0257-6
  15. Peerless SJ, Drake CG : Treatment of giant cerebral aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Neurosurg Rev 5 : 149-154, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742677
  16. Raymond J, Gentric JC, Darsaut TE, Iancu D, Chagnon M, Weill A, et al. : Flow diversion in the treatment of aneurysms: a randomized care trial and registry. J Neurosurg 127 : 454-462, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.4.JNS152662
  17. Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J : Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 32 : 1998-2004, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0901.095600
  18. Sluzewski M, Menovsky T, van Rooij WJ, Wijnalda D : Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24 : 257-262, 2003
  19. Sundt TM, Jr., Piepgras DG : Surgical approach to giant intracranial aneurysms. Operative experience with 80 cases. J Neurosurg 51 : 731- 742, 1979 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1979.51.6.0731
  20. UCAS Japan Investigators, Morita A, Kirino T, Hashi K, Aoki N, Fukuhara S, et al. : The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 366 : 2474-2482, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113260
  21. van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M : Endovascular treatment of large and giant aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30 : 12-18, 2009 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1267
  22. van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, van der Laak C : Flow diverters for unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms: dangerous and not yet an alternative for conventional endovascular techniques. AJNR Am J Neu- roradiol 34 : 3-4, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3317

Cited by

  1. Incidental Microaneurysms During Microvascular Surgery: Incidence, Treatment, and Significance vol.133, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.159
  2. Injectable inclusion complex composed of α-cyclodextrin and hydrophobically modified poly(vinyl alcohol) as a cerebral aneurysm embolization material vol.52, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-0321-1