DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Asymmetric effects of speaking rate on the vowel/consonant ratio conditioned by coda voicing in English

  • Received : 2018.05.24
  • Accepted : 2018.06.18
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The vowel/consonant ratio is a well-known cue for the voicing of postvocalic consonants. This study investigates how this ratio changes as a function of speaking rate. Seven speakers of North American English read sentences containing target monosyllabic words that contrasted in coda voicing at three different speaking rates. Duration measures were taken for the voice onset time (VOT) of the onset consonant, the vowel, and the coda. The results show that the durations of the onset VOT and vowel are longer before voiced codas, and that the durations of all segments increase monotonically as speaking rate decreases. Importantly, the vowel/consonant ratio, a primary acoustic cue for coda voicing, was found to pattern asymmetrically for voiced and voiceless codas; it increases for voiced codas but decreases for voiceless codas with the decrease in speaking rate. This finding suggests that there is no stable ratio in the duration of preconsonantal vowels that is maintained in different speaking styles.

Keywords

References

  1. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.2.21. http://www.praat.org/
  2. Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. J., & Jones, M. J. (2010). Analysing stops. In M. Di Paolo & M. Yaeger-Dror (Eds.), Sociophonetics: A student's guide. London: Routledge.
  3. Hirata, Y. (2004). Effects of speaking rate on the vowel length distinction in Japanese. Journal of Phonetics, 32(4), 565-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.004
  4. Kessinger, R. H., & Blumstein, S. E. (1997). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 143-168. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0039
  5. Klatt, D. H. (1973). Letter: Interaction between two factors that influence vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 54. 1102-4. 10.1121/1.1914322.
  6. Kluender, K. R., Diehl, R. L., & Wright, B. A. (1988). Vowel-length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory explanation. Journal of Phonetics, 16(2), 153-169.
  7. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1-26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
  8. Lehiste, I. (1972). The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 51. 10.1121/1.1913062.
  9. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983). Consonant/vowel ratio: An improbable cue in speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 33(5), 501-505. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202904
  10. Pickett, E. R., Blumstein, S. E, & Burton, M. W. (1999). Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate contrast in Italian. Phonetica, 56(3-4), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028448
  11. Pind, J. (1986). The perception of quantity in Icelandic. Phonetica, 43(1-3), 116-139. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261765
  12. Pind, J. (1999). Speech segment durations and quantity in Icelandic. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(2), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427114
  13. Port, R. F. (1981). Linguistic timing factors in combination. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69(1), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385347
  14. Port, R. F., & Dalby, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics, 32(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204273
  15. Port, R. F., Al-Ani, S., & Maeda, S. (1980). Temporal compensation and universal phonetics. Phonetica, 37(4), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259994
  16. R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
  17. Smiljanic, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2008). Stability of temporal contrasts across speaking styles in English and Croatian. Journal of Phonetics, 36(1), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.002
  18. Svastikula, M. L. K. (1986). A perceptual and acoustic study of the effects of speech rate on distinctive vowel length in Thai. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut. Ann Arbor: ProQuest Information and Learning, USA.
  19. Turk, A. E., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2007). Multiple targets of phrase final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 445-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2006.12.001
  20. Yuan, J., & Liberman, M. (2008). Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5), 3878.