DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Phonological processes of vowels from orthographic to pronounced words in the Buckeye Corpus by sex and age groups

  • Received : 2018.04.30
  • Accepted : 2018.06.08
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

This paper investigated the phonological processes of monophthongs and diphthongs in the pronounced words present in the Buckeye Corpus and compared the frequency distribution of these processes by sex and age groups to provide a clearer understanding of spoken English to linguists and phoneticians. Both orthographic and pronounced words were extracted from the transcribed label scripts of the Buckeye Corpus using R. Next, the phonological processes of monophthongs and diphthongs in the orthographic and pronounced labels were tabulated using R scripts, and a frequency distribution by vowel process types, as well as sex and age groups, was created. The results revealed that 95% of the orthographic words contained the same number of syllables, whereas 5% had different numbers of vowels, thereby proving that speakers tend to preserve vowels in spontaneous speech. In addition, deletion processes were preferred in natural speech. Most vowel deletions occurred with an unstressed syllable. Chi-square tests were performed to calculate dependence in the distribution of phonological process types for male and female groups and young and old groups. The results showed a very strong correlation. This finding indicates that vowel processes occurred in approximately the same pattern in natural and spontaneous speech data regardless of sex and age, as well as whether or not the vowel processes were identical. Based on these results, the author concludes that an analysis of phonological processes in spontaneous speech corpora can greatly enhance practical understanding of spoken English.

Keywords

References

  1. Bauman-Waengler, J. (2009). Introduction to phonetics and phonology: From concepts to transcription. Boston: Pearson.
  2. Cappeau, P., Sabio, F., Bilger, M., & Chanet, C. (2004). Autour du Corpus de reference du francais parle. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l'Universite de Provence.
  3. Davenport, M., & Hannahs, S. J. (1998). Introducing phonetics and phonology. London: Arnold.
  4. Durand, J., Gut, U., & Kristoffersen, G. (2017). The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Fosler-Lussier, E., Dilley, L., Tyson, N., & Pitt, M. (2005). The Buckeye corpus of speech: Updates and enhancements. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/14460741/The_buckeye_corpus_of_speech_updates_and_enhancements on March 1, 2018.
  6. Garofolo, J. S., Lamel, L. F., Fisher, W. M., Fiscus, J. G., Pallett, D. S., Dahlgren, N. L., & Zue, V. (1993). TIMIT. Acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus. Retrieved from https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/ldc93s1 on March 1, 2018.
  7. Johnson, K. (2003). Massive reduction in conversational American English. In K. Yoneyama & K. Maekawa (Eds.), Spontaneous speech: Data and analysis, Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium (pp. 29-54). Tokyo, Japan.
  8. Kiesling, S., Dilley, L. & Raymond, W. D. (2018). The Variation in Conversation (ViC) project: Creation of the Buckeye Corpus of conversational speech. Retrieved from https://buckeyecorpus.osu.edu/BuckeyeCorpusmanual.pdf on March 1, 2018.
  9. Kohler, K. J., Peters, B., & Scheffers, M. (2017). The Kiel Corpus of spoken German: Read and spontaneous speech. Retrieved from https://www.isfas.uni-kiel.de/de/linguistik/forschung/kiel-corpus/the-kiel-corpus-of-spoken-german-read-and-spontaneous-speech on March 1, 2018.
  10. Maddieson, I., & Disner, S. F. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Maddieson, I. (1997). Phonetic universals. In W. J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, & Gibbon, F. E. (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 619-639). Oxford: Blackwell.
  12. Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906875
  13. Pitt, M. A., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E., & Fosler-Lussier, E. (2007). Buckeye corpus of conversational speech (2nd release). Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University. Retrieved from https://buckeyecorpus.osu.edu/ on March 1, 2018.
  14. R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/ on March 1, 2018.
  15. Wright, R. (2003). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In J. Local, R. Ogden, R. Temple, M. E. Beckman, & J. Kingston (Eds.), Phonetic interpretation: Papers in laboratory phonology VI (pp. 75-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Yang, B. (1990). Development of vowel normalization procedures: English and Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
  17. Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of English and Korean monophthongs produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24(2), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0013
  18. Yang, B. (2012). Reduction and frequency analyses of vowels and consonants in the Buckeye Corpus. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 4(3), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2012.4.3.075
  19. Yang, B. (2016a). Phoneme distribution and syllable structure of entry words in the CMU English Pronouncing Dictionary. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 8(2), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2016.8.2.011
  20. Yang, B. (2016b). Phoneme distribution and phonological processes of orthographic and pronounced phrasal words in light of syllable structure in the Seoul Corpus. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 8(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2016.8.4.001
  21. Yang, B. (2017). Phonological processes of vowels in pronounced phrasal words of the Seoul Corpus by gender and age groups. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 9(2), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2017.9.2.023
  22. Yun, W., Yoon, K., Park, S., Lee, J., Cho, S., Kang, D., Byun, K., Hahn, H., & Kim, J. (2015). The Korean corpus of spontaneous speech. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 7(2), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.2.103