Journal of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회지:중재연구)

The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

U.S. Court's Interpretation for Arbitrability

중재가능성에 대한 미국연방법원의 해석

  • 한나희 (부산대학교 무역학부 BK+ 사업팀) ;
  • 하충룡 (부산대학교 무역학부)
  • Received : 2018.11.11
  • Accepted : 2018.11.30
  • Published : 2018.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The foundation of arbitration is the arbitration agreement between parties. If no agreement to arbitrate exists, the parties should not send to arbitrate their disputes. In the United States, there are no provisions as to arbitrability under the Federal Arbitration Act. Before a court can enforce arbitration, it must first determine arbitrability. The general presumption is that the issue of arbitrability should be resolved by the courts. The question of whether parties have submitted a particular dispute to arbitration raises a question of arbitrability which is an issue for judicial determination unless the parties clearly and unmistakably have provided otherwise. Determining if the parties agreed to arbitrate a dispute involves inquiries into whether there is a valid agreement to arbitrate the claims, and the dispute falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review how to settle the issue of arbitrability in the U.S. federal courts.

Keywords

References

  1. 강수미, "미국 판례상 중재조항의 분리가능성에 관한 고찰", 중재연구 제24권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2014.
  2. 강수미, "미국의 증권거래분쟁중재에 관한 고찰" 비교사법 제19권 3호, 한국비교사법학회, 2012.
  3. 김상만, "계약 및 중재합의 유효성의 소송 대상적격성에 대한 미국 연방대법원의 입장에 관한 연구", 동아법학 제50호, 동아대학교 법학연구소, 2011.
  4. 김인호, "중재가능성의 합리적 경계획정을 통한 국제중재의 증진", 비교사법 제23권 제3호, 한국비교사법학회, 2016.
  5. 목영준, 상사중재법, 박영사, 2011.
  6. 성준호, "중재산업진흥법의 주요내용과 발전적 운용", 중재연구 제27권 제4호, 한국중재학회, 2017.
  7. 손경한, "중재 자치와 중재의 준거법", 국제사법연구 제17호, 한국국제사법학회, 2011.
  8. 이용재, "중재대상적격과 전속관할", 계간중재 제346호, 대한상사중재원, 2016.
  9. 이헌묵, "국제적 강행법규에 대한 중재가능성", 국제거래법연구 제22집 제2호, 국제거래법학회, 2013.
  10. 하충룡, "최근 미연방대법원의 판례를 통한 중재합의조항 분리원칙(Doctrine of Separability)의 재평가", 국제상학 제21권 제3호, 한국국제상학회, 2006.
  11. 하충룡.박원형, "중재합의의 유효성에 관한 미국법원의 해석과 함의", 국제상학 제22권 제1호, 한국국제상학회, 2007.
  12. Alan Scott Rau, The Arbitrability Question Itself, 10 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 287, 1999.
  13. Caitlin Toto, "Third Circuit confirms the Class Arbitration "Clear and Unmistakable" Standard in Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC. v. Scout Petroleum, LLC, dealing a blow to Consumers and Employees", 58 B.C. L. Rev. E-Supplement 163, 2017.
  14. Christopher R. Drahozal, "Buckeye Check Cashing and The Separability Doctrine", 1 Yearbook on Arb. & Med 54, 2009.
  15. David Horton, "Arbitration About Arbitration", 70 Stan. L. Rev. 363, 2018.
  16. George A. Bermann, "Arbitrability Trouble", 23 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 367, 2012.
  17. George A. Berman, "The "Gateway" Problem in International Commercial Arbitration", 37 Yale J. Int'l L. 1, 2012.
  18. Jack M. Graves, Yelena Davydan, "Competence-Competence and Separability- American Style" International Arbitration and International Commercial Law: Synergy, Convergence and Evolution, 2011.
  19. Jay E. Grenig, Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1 Alt. Disp. Resol. (4th ed.), September 2018 Update.
  20. Jean R. Sternlight, "The Rise and Spread of Mandatory Arbitration as a Substitute for the Jury Trial", 38 U.S.F. L. REV. 17, 2003.
  21. John J. Barcelo III, "Arbitrability Decisions Before, During and After Arbitration", Cornell Law School research paper No. 14-24, 2014.
  22. Thomas H. Oehmk, "Substative and Procedural Arbitrability in Ad Hoc Investor-State Arbitration-BG Group v. Argentina", Cornell Law School research paper No. 14-25, 2014.
  23. Joseph T. Mclaughlin, "Arbitrability: Current Trends in the United States", 59 Alb. L. Rev. 905, 1996.
  24. Margaret L. Moses, "Statutory Misconstruction: How the Supreme Court created a Federal Arbitration Law never enacted by Congress", 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 99, 2006.
  25. Michael J. Yelnosky, "DRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia and the Continued Ascendance of Federal Common Law: Class-Action Waivers and Mandatory Arbitration Under the Federal Arbitration Act", Roger Williams University Law Review: Vol. 22 : Iss. 1, Article 7, 2017.
  26. Thomas H. Oehmke, Arbitration Highways to the Courthouse-A Litigator's Roadmap, 86 Am. Jur. Trials 111, American Jurisprudence Trials, May 2018 Update.
  27. Thomas H. Oehmk, Joan M. Brovins, Arbitrability Disputes: Proving What Facts to Whom, 92 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 1, June 2018.
  28. Thomas H. Oehmk, Joan M. Brovins, Commercial Arbitration, 1 Commercial Arbitration, May 2018 Update.
  29. Thomas H. Oehmk, Joan M. Brovins, The Arbitration Contract - Making it and Breaking it, 83 American Jurisprudence Proof of Facts 3d1, June 2018 Update.

Cited by

  1. Third Party Funding in International Arbitration and its most current Development in Asia -Issue of Security for Costs and its main Cases vol.29, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2019.29.4.77