DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Treatment of oily wastewater from cold-rolling mill through coagulation and integrated membrane processes

  • Cheng, Xue-Ni (College of Chemistry, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Henan University of Technology) ;
  • Gong, Yan-Wen (College of Chemistry, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Henan University of Technology)
  • Received : 2016.11.03
  • Accepted : 2017.12.31
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The feasibility of applying coagulation-integrated microfiltration (MF) as a pretreatment for an ultrafiltration (UF) feed in oily wastewater treatment was investigated. The effects of different coagulants on oil removal rates from wastewater were studied. The maximum oil removal rate of 82% was obtained after coagulation with 130 mg/L of polyaluminium chloride (PAC). UF flux reached $95L/(m^2{\cdot}h)$ with coagulation-integrated MF as pretreatment. This value was 2.5 times higher than that flux obtained without pretreatment. The value of UF flux increased as the transmembrane pressure (TMP) and cross-flow velocity (CFV) of the UF module increased. UF flux gradually increased when TMP and CFV exceeded 0.4 MPa and 3 m/s, respectively, because of concentration polarization and membrane fouling stabilization. Chemical oxygen demand reduction and oil removal rate reached 95.2% and 98.5%, respectively, during integrated membrane processing with a PAC concentration of 130 mg/L, TMP of 0.4 MPa, and CFV of 3 m/s for UF. In addition, sequentially cleaning the fouling membrane with NaOH and $HNO_3$ aqueous solutions caused UF flux to recover to 90%. These encouraging results suggested that the hybrid integrated membrane process-based coagulation and MF + UF are effective approaches for oily wastewater treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhang YH, Gan FX, Li M, Li J, Li SQ, Wu SH. New integrated processes for treating cold-rolling mill emulsion wastewater. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2010;17:32-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60110-0
  2. Zhang YH, Gan FX, Li M, Wang DH, Huang ZM, Gao YP. Treatment of reused comprehensive wastewater in iron and steel industry with electrosorption technology. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2011;18:37-42.
  3. Jamaly S, Giwa A, Hasan SW. Recent improvements in oil wastewater treatment: Progress, challenges, and future opportunities. J. Environ. Sci. 2015;37:15-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.011
  4. Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal AK, Purkait MK. Cross-flow ultrafiltration of stable oil in water emulsion using polysulfone membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 2010;165:447-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.09.031
  5. Duong PH, Chung TS, Shawn W, Lana I. Highly permeable double-skinned forward osmosis membranes for anti-fouling in the emulsified oil-water separation process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:4537-4545. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405644u
  6. Luo L, Han G, Chung TS, Weber M. Oil/water separation via ultrafiltration by novel triangle-shapetri-bore hollow fiber membranes from sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone. J. Membr. Sci. 2015;476:162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.035
  7. Zhu Y, Wang D, Jiang L, Jin J. Recent progress in developing advanced membranes for emulsified oil/water separation. NPG Asia Mater. 2014;6:e101. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2014.23
  8. Ohya H, Kim JJ, Chinen A, et al. Effects of pore size on separation mechanisms of microfiltration of oily water using porous glass tubular membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1998;145:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00067-2
  9. Hua FL, Tsang YF, Wang YJ, Chan SY, Chua H, Sin SN. Performance study of ceramic microfiltration membrane for oily wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2007;128:169-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.10.017
  10. Lobo A, Cambiella Á, Benito JM, Pazos C, Coca J. Ultrafiltration of oil-in-water emulsions with ceramic membranes: Influence of pH and crossflow velocity. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;278:328-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.11.016
  11. Rajasekhar T, Trinadh M, Babu PV, Sainath AVS. Oil-water emulsion separation using ultrafiltration membranes based on novel blends of poly (vinylidene fluoride) and amphiphilic tri-block copolymer containing carboxylic acid functional group. J. Membr. Sci. 2015;481:82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.030
  12. Yuliwati E, Ismail AF. Effect of additives concentration on the surface properties and performance of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes for refinery produced wastewater treatment. Desalination 2011;273:226-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.023
  13. Gutierrez G, Lobo A, Benito JM, Coca J, Pazos C. Treatment of a waste oil-in- water emulsion from a copper-rolling process by ultrafiltration and vacuum evapora-tion. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;185:1569-1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.088
  14. Mohammadi T, Esmaeelifar A. Wastewater treatment of avegetable oil factory by a hybrid ultrafiltration-activated carbon process. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;254:129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.037
  15. Yahiaoui O, Lounici H, Abdi N, Drouiche N, Ghaffour N, Pauss A. Treatment of olive mill wastewater by the combination of ultrafiltration and bipolar electro-chemical reactor processes. Chem. Eng. Process. 2011;50:37-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.11.003
  16. Matos M, García CF, Suarez MA, Pazos C, Benito JM. Treatment of oil-in-water emulsions by a destabilization/ultrafiltration hybrid process: Statistical analysis of operating parameters. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016;59:295-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.08.006
  17. Pulido JMO, Stoller M, Palma LD, Ferez AM. On the optimization of a flocculation process as fouling inhibiting pretreatment on an ultrafiltration membrane during olive mill effluents treatment. Desalination 2016;393:151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.021
  18. Karhu M, Kuokkanen T, Ramo J, Mikola M, Tanskanen J. Performance of a commercial industrial-scale UF-based process for treatment of oily wastewaters. J. Environ. Manage. 2013;128:413-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.053

Cited by

  1. Assessment of an Electrocoagulation Reactor for the Removal of Oil Content and Turbidity from Real Oily Wastewater Using Response Surface Method vol.13, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/2405520412666190830091842
  2. Oily Wastewater Treatment: Overview of Conventional and Modern Methods, Challenges, and Future Opportunities vol.13, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070980
  3. Three-step treatment of real complex, variable high-COD rolling wastewater by rational adjustment of acidification, adsorption, and photocatalysis using big data analysis vol.270, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118865