Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제31권8호
  • /
  • Pages.1183-1196
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of roughage quality, period of day and time lapse after meal termination on rumen digesta load in goats and sheep

  • Moyo, Mehluli (Animal and Poultry Science, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal) ;
  • Adebayo, Rasheed Adekunle (Animal and Poultry Science, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal) ;
  • Nsahlai, Ignatius Verla (Animal and Poultry Science, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.28
  • 심사 : 2017.07.28
  • 발행 : 2018.08.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: This study ascertained effects of roughage quality, period of day at meal termination and time lapse after feeding on digesta load in the rumen. Methods: Veld hay was untreated (poor roughage quality, PRQ), improved (improved roughage quality, IRQ) by treating with urea or semi-improved by spraying with urea (semi-improved roughage quality, SIRQ). Experiment 1a used four rumen fistulated sheep to determine in-sacco degradability. Twelve sheep ($56.3{\pm}4.59kg$) were blocked by weight and randomly allocated to IRQ (n = 6) and PRQ (n = 6) to determine solid and liquid passage rates. In experiment 1b, nine sheep ($37.6{\pm}9.34kg$) were blocked by weight and randomly allocated to IRQ (n = 4) and PRQ (n = 5) to determine digestibility. Sixteen sheep ($36.47{\pm}9.46kg$) were blocked by body weight and randomly allocated to IRQ (n = 8) and PRQ (n = 8). Two sheep were slaughtered for each sampling time in each treatment (IRQ and PRQ) at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h after feeding to determine rumen load. In experiment 2, eighteen goats ($25.4{\pm}9.08kg$) were blocked by weight and randomly allocated to IRQ (n = 6), SIRQ (n = 6), and PRQ (n = 6). Then all 18 goats were slaughtered soon after meal termination in the morning; afternoon and evening to determine the effect of period of day on rumen fill. Results: Rate of degradation and effective degradability were enhanced by improvement of roughage quality. Roughage quality had no effect on digestibility, but digestibility was higher in goats than sheep. Fractional passage rate of particles was higher for IRQ than PRQ, but similar for liquids. Digesta fractional clearance rates at 24 h after feeding were 0.018/h (IRQ) and 0.006/h (PRQ). Period of day had an influence on rumen load. Neutral detergent fibre load for goats were above 2.03 kg/100 kg body weight for all diet treatments. Conclusion: Following starvation, passage rate had negligible effects on emptying of rumen load.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Rust JM, Rust T. Climate change and livestock production: a review with emphasis on Africa. S Afr J Anim Sci 2013;43:255-67. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v43i3.3
  2. Osuji PO, Fernandez-Rivera S, Odenyo A. Improving fibre utilisation and protein supply in animals fed poor quality roughages. In: Wallace RJ, Lahlou-Kassi A, editors. Rumen ecology research planning. Proceedings of a Workshop Held at ILRI; 1995 March 13-18; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. p. 9-30.
  3. Emmans G, Kyriazakis I. Consequences of genetic change in farm animals on food intake and feeding behaviour: Nutrition and Behaviour Group Symposium on Future Perspectives in Nutrition and Behaviour Research. Proc Nutr Soc 2001;60:115-25. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS200059
  4. Nsahlai IV, Umunna NN, Osuji PO. An empirical model for predicting voluntary intake of forage-legume-supplemented roughages by cattle. In: All Africa conference on animal agriculture; 1996 April 1-4; Pretoria, South Africa: South African Society of Animal Science; 1996. p 10.4.
  5. Adebayo RA. Effect of roughage quality and period of meal termination on rumen fill [master's thesis]. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2015.
  6. Osuji PO, Nsahlai IV, Kalili H. Feed evaluation. International Livestock Centre for Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: ILCA Manual; 1993.
  7. Hatfield PG, Clanton DC, Sanson DW, Eskridge KM. Methods of administering ytterbium for estimation of faecal output. J Range Manag 1990;1:16-20.
  8. Uden P, Colucci PE, Van Soest PJ. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. J Sci Food Agric 1980;31:625-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740310702
  9. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Washington DC, USA: AOAC International; 1999.
  10. Orskov ER, DeB Hovell FD, Mould F. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop Anim Prod 1980;5:195-213.
  11. McDonald I. A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. J Agric Sci 1981;96:251-2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600032081
  12. Nsahlai IV, Bryant MJ, Umunna NN. Utilisation of barley straw by steers: the effect of quantity and source of nitrogen on the degradation of straw fractions, particle outflow rate and intake. J Appl Anim Res 1998;14:33-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.1998.9706214
  13. Grovum WL, Williams VJ. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate-constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. Br J Nutr 1973;30:313-29. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19730036
  14. Clauss M, Lechner-Doll M. Differences in selective reticulo-ruminal particle retention as a key factor in ruminant diversification. Oecologia 2001;129:321-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100735
  15. Hadjigeorgiou IE, Gordon IJ, Milne JA. Intake, digestion and selection of roughage with different staple lengths by sheep and goats. Small Rumin Res 2003;47:117-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00242-0
  16. Moyo M. Effects of diet quality and time lapse after meal termination on rumen load, rate of passage and feeding behaviour [master's thesis]. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2016.
  17. Alcaide EM, Martin-Garcia AI, Aguilera JF. A comparative study of nutrient digestibility, kinetics of degradation and passage and rumen fermentation pattern in goats and sheep offered good quality diets. Livest Prod Sci 2000;64:215-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00149-9
  18. Taweel HZ, Tas BM, Dijkstra J, Tamminga S. Intake regulation and grazing behaviour of dairy cows under continuous stocking. J Dairy Sci 2004;87:3417-27. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73477-3
  19. Williams YJ, Doyle PT, Egan AR. Diurnal variation in rumen fill of dairy cows grazing Persian clover at different pasture allowances. Anim Prod Sci 2014;54:1388-93.
  20. Baumont R, Brun JP, Dulphy JP. Influence of the nature of hay on its ingestibility and the kinetics of intake during large meals in sheep and cow. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Grassland Congress; 1989 Oct 4-11; Nice, France: Association Francaise pour la Production Fourragere; 1989. p. 787-8.
  21. Schlecht E, Richter H, Fernandez-Rivera S, Becker K. Gastrointestinal passage of Sahelian roughages in cattle, sheep and goats, and implications for livestock-mediated nutrient transfers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2007;137:93-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.001
  22. Nsahlai IV, Umunna NN. Bonsi MLK. The utilization of teff (Eragrotis tef) straw by sheep fed supplementary forage legumes with or without either crushed maize grain or wheat bran. Small Rumin Res 1998;29:303-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(97)00132-6
  23. Adeyemo AAB. Livestock ownership by gender and seasonal impact on production: a case study at Msinga Municipality [master's thesis]. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2015.
  24. Fuller MF, Benavenga NJ, Lall SP, et al. The encyclopaedia of farm animal nutrition. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2004.
  25. Yansari T, Hamidi A, PirMohamadi R, Azary M. Rumen contents and ruminal digesta particle size distribution in buffalo steers fed three different size of alfalfa. Ital J Anim Sci 2007;6:429-32. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.429
  26. Waghorn GC, Reid CS, Ulyatt MJ, John A. Feed comminution, particle composition and distribution between the four compartments of the stomach in sheep fed chaffed lucerne hay at two feeding frequencies and intake levels. J Agric Sci 1986;106:287-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063875
  27. Oshita T, Sudo K, Nonaka K, Kume S, Ochiai K. The effect of feed regimen on chewing time, digesta passage rate and particle size distribution in Holstein non-lactating cows fed pasture ad libitum. Livest Sci 2008;113:243-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.04.001
  28. Sekine J, Oura R, Miyazaki H, Okamoto M, Asahida Y. Effect of time after feeding on distribution of digesta in the gastrointestinal tracts of sheep. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 1991;4:99-102. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1991.99
  29. Chilibroste P, Tamminga S, Van Bruchem J, Van der Togt PL. Effect of allowed grazing time, inert rumen bulk and length of starvation before grazing on the weight, composition and fermentative end-products of the rumen contents of lactating dairy cows. Grass Forage Sci 1998;53:146-56. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.5320146.x
  30. Frandson RD. Anatomy and physiology of farm animals. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1981.
  31. Prins RA, Hungate RE, Prast ER. Function of the omasum in several ruminant species. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol 1972;43:155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(72)90477-X
  32. Moolchand M, Wang J, Gui H, Shen Z. Ruminal butyrate infusion increased papillae size and digesta weight but did not change liquid flow rate in the rumen of goats. J Anim Plant Sci 2013;23:1516-21.
  33. Bosch MW, Bruining M, Van Bruchem J. Passage rate and total clearance rate of digesta from the rumen of cows fed grass silages. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 1989;2:427-8. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1989.427
  34. Huhtanen P, Dakowski P, Vanhatalo A. Composition, digestibility and particle-associated enzyme activities in rumen digesta as influenced by particle size and time after feeding. J Anim Feed Sci 1993;1(3-4):223-35.
  35. Mertens DR. Application of theoretical mathematical models to cell wall digestion and forage intake in ruminants [PhD thesis]. New York, USA: Cornell University; 1973.
  36. Alvarez-Rodriguez J, Sanz A, Ripoll-Bosch R, Joy M. Do alfalfa grazing and lactation length affect the digestive tract fill of light lambs? Small Rumin Res 2010;94:109-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.07.009

피인용 문헌

  1. Stocking Rate Has No Confounding Effect on the Use of Internal and Inert Markers to Predict Botanical Composition, Diet Quality, Degradability and Passage Rate Kinetics in Sheep vol.10, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122232
  2. Application of the laser methane detector for measurements in freely grazing goats: impact on animals' behaviour and methane emissions vol.15, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2020.100070
  3. The use of artificial neural networks for modelling rumen fill vol.101, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0101
  4. The use of artificial neural networks for modelling rumen fill vol.101, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0101