DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation Measures of Liquefied Chlorine Leak

액화염소 누출의 위험도 분석 및 위험경감조치에 대한 연구

  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Environment & Safety Engineering, INHA University) ;
  • Chon, Young-Woo (Department of Environment & Safety Engineering, INHA University) ;
  • Hwang, Yong-Woo (Department of Environment & Safety Engineering, INHA University) ;
  • Lee, Ik-Mo (Department of Environment & Safety Engineering, INHA University)
  • 이주연 (인하대학교 대학원 환경안전융합전공) ;
  • 천영우 (인하대학교 대학원 환경안전융합전공) ;
  • 황용우 (인하대학교 대학원 환경안전융합전공) ;
  • 이익모 (인하대학교 대학원 환경안전융합전공)
  • Received : 2017.12.26
  • Accepted : 2018.03.28
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

As the chemical industry becomes more advanced, the awareness of chemical accidents is rising, and legal systems for chemical safety management are strengthened. In this study, quantitative risk assessment of liquid chlorine leak was conducted. Risk assessment was performed in the order of frequency analysis, consequence analysis, and risk calculation. The individual risk was presented in the form of contour lines. The social risk was expressed by the FN curve. The risk of day and night was in an unacceptable area, so it was required to mitigate risk. Therefore in-building, which could trap the pool, was selected as a risk mitigation measure. As a result of the cost benefit analysis, it was concluded that this measure should be reasonably implemented.

Keywords

References

  1. Jung, G.S.(2015), "Liquid chlorine leak damage modeling of petrochemical complex" Dongshin univ., 19-78
  2. Shin, D.M.(2017), "A study on risk reduction through protection layers for ethylene oxide storage facilities" Myongji univ., 1-5
  3. Korea Gas Safety Corporation(2017), 2016 Gas accident yearbook, 140-145
  4. Moon, I., et al(2016), Introduction to Chemical Safety, Cheongsong, 8-182
  5. Health and Safety Executive, U.K.(2010), Reducing risks, protecting people, 42-65
  6. Kim, D.G(2012), Cost benefit analysis, Pakyoungsa, 39-110
  7. Na, J.Y.(2013), "Cost-benefit analysis of the introduction of advanced water treatment process : focused on the case of 'K-water B water treatment plant" Seoul national univ., 8-10
  8. Seo J.H.(2014), "Economic analysis of the used magnesia-carbon brick recycling using microwave" Pohang univ. of science & technology, 2-3
  9. Health and Safety Executive, U.K., "Cost Benefit Analysis(CBA) checklist" http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarpcheck.htm
  10. Ryu, Y.D.(2010), "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Risk Mitigation Measures on High Pressure Urban Gas Pipelines" Seoul national Univ. of science and technology, 15-103
  11. Health and Safety Executive, U.K., "Guidance on ALARP Decisions in COMAH Annex 1" http://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/internalops/hid_circs/permissioning/spc_perm_37/annex1.pdf
  12. Korea Meteorological Administration, "Meteorological data link portal" Climatic statistics analysis, https://data.kma.go.kr
  13. Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency(2016), Technical Guidelines for Selecting the worst-case scenario for the worst-case scenario, 2-10
  14. American Institute of Chemical Engineers(2000), Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis 2nd Edition. New York : Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 64-65
  15. International Association of Oil & Gas Producers(2010), Risk Assessment Data Directory Report No. 434-1, Process release frequencies, 7-9
  16. DNV.GL(2014), Theory Unified Dispersion Model ,54-93
  17. Sam Mannan(2012), Lees' loss prevention in the process industries : hazard identification, assessment, and control, volume1, Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, 1031-1040
  18. David R. Lide(2004), CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics, 84th edition, CRC Press, 4-51,4-61
  19. "Solubility of Things,"Levels of solubility, http://www.solubilityofthings.com/
  20. DNV.GL(2014), Theory Indoor Dispersion 1-3