DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Semen Quality among Workers Exposed to Heat Stress: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Steel Industry

  • Hamerezaee, Masoud (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science) ;
  • Dehghan, Somayeh F. (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Golbabaei, Farideh (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science) ;
  • Fathi, Asad (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science) ;
  • Barzegar, Loghman (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science) ;
  • Heidarnejad, Naseh (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.09
  • 심사 : 2017.07.10
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30

초록

Background: This study was conducted to investigate the heat stress and semen quality among male workers in a steel industry in Iran and investigate the relationship between heat stress indices and semen parameters. Methods: The study was conducted on workers exposed (n = 30) and unexposed (n = 14) to heat in a steel industry. After obtaining a brief biography of the selected employees, scrotal temperature, oral temperature, and environmental parameters were measured, and their semen samples were analyzed according to the procedure recommended by the World Health Organization. The heat stress indices, including wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and predicted heat strain (PHS), in their workplace were calculated according to environmental parameters (ISO 7243:1989 and 7933:2004, respectively). Results: Time-weighted averages of WBGT and PHS ($35.76^{\circ}C$ and 491.56 $w/m^2{\frac{w}{m^2}}$, respectively) for the exposed group were higher than threshold limit values. The mean difference of environmental, physiological, and semen parameters (exception: pH of semen), and also WBGT and PHS indices were statistically significant (p < 0.05) between the two groups. Mean semen parameters were in the normozoospermic range. WBGT and PHS indices showed significantly "negative" correlation with physiological parameters (scrotal and oral temperature) and most semen parameters (semen volume, sperm morphology, sperm motility, sperm count; p < 0.05); moreover, the correlation of WBGT with these parameters was stronger than PHS. Conclusion: Semen parameters of the studied workers exposed to heat were in the borderline level of normozoospermic range, and their semen parameters were significantly lower than controls. For better assessment of occupational environment concerning physiological and semen parameters in steel industries, WBGT can be a more useful index.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cortez OD. Heat stress assessment among workers in a Nicaraguan sugarcane farm. Glob Health Action 2009;2:1-6. Published online 11 Nov 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org.10.3402/gha.v2i0.2069.
  2. Vatani J, Golbabaei F, Dehghan SF, Yousefi A. Applicability of Universal Ther- mal Climate Index (UTCI) in occupational heat stress assessment: a case study in brick industries. Ind Health 2016;54:14-9. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2015-0069
  3. Golbabaei F, Monazzam MR, Hematjo R, Hosseini M, Dehghan SF. The assessment of heat stress and heat strain in Pardis Petrochemical Complex, Tehran, Iran. Int J Occup Health 2013;5:6-11.
  4. Monazzam MR, Golbabaei F, Hematjo R, Hosseini M, Nassiri P, Dehghan SF. Evaluation of DI, WBGT and Swreq/PHS heat stress indices for estimating the heat load on the employees of a petrochemical industry. Int J Occup Health 2014;6:6-10.
  5. Epstein Y, Moran DS. Thermal comfort and the heat stress indices. Ind Health 2006;44:388-98. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.44.388
  6. Mazlomi A, Golbabaei F, Farhang Dehghan S, Abbasinia M, Mahmoud Khani S, Ansari M, Hosseini M. The influence of occupational heat exposure on cognitive performance and blood level of stress hormones: a field study report. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2017;23:431-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1251137
  7. Bedford J, Berrios M, Dryden G. Biology of the scrotum. IV. Testis location and temperature sensitivity. J Exp Zool 1982;224:379-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402240311
  8. Mieusset R, Bujan L, Mansat A, Grandjean H, Pontonnier F. Heat induced inhibition of spermatogenesis in man. In: Zorgniotti AW, editor. Temperature and environmental effects on the testis. New York: Plenum Press; 1991. p. 233-7.
  9. Momen MN, Ananian FB, Fahmy IM, Mostafa T. Effect of high environmental temperature on semen parameters among fertile men. Fertil Steril 2010;93: 1884-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.065
  10. Sas M, Szollosi J. Impaired spermiogenesis as a common finding among professional drivers. Arch Androl 1979;3:57-60. https://doi.org/10.3109/01485017908985049
  11. Thonneau P, Bujan L, Multigner L, Mieusset R. Occupational heat exposure and male fertility: a review. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2122-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.8.2122
  12. Jung A, Schuppe HC. Influence of genital heat stress on semen quality in humans. Andrologia 2007;39:203-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2007.00794.x
  13. Zhang M-H, Shi Z-D, Yu J-C, Zhang Y-P, Wang L-G, Qiu Y. Scrotal heat stress causes sperm chromatin damage and cysteinyl aspartate-specific proteinases 3 changes in fertile men. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:747-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0451-0
  14. Klonoff-Cohen H. Female and male lifestyle habits and IVF: what is known and unknown. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:179-203.
  15. Avendano C, Mata A, Sarmiento CAS, Doncel GF. Use of laptop computers connected to Internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril 2012;97:39-45. e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.012
  16. Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7: 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.1.59
  17. Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A. Varicocele and male infertility: part II: pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:473-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.5.473
  18. Sinclair S. Male infertility: nutritional and environmental considerations. Altern Med Rev 2000;5:28-38.
  19. Gandini L, Sgro P, Lombardo F, Paoli D, Culasso F, Toselli L, Tsamatropoulos P, Lenzi A. Effect of chemo- or radiotherapy on sperm parameters of testicular cancer patients. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2882-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del167
  20. Ball B, Medina V, Gravance C, Baumber J. Effect of antioxidants on preserva- tion of motility, viability and acrosomal integrity of equine spermatozoa during storage at $5^{\circ}C$. Theriogenology 2001;56:577-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00590-8
  21. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO Press; 2010. p. 1-287.
  22. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 7243: hot environmentsd-estimation of the heat stress on working man, based on the WBGT Index (Web Bulb Globe Temperature). Geneva (Switzerland): ISO; 1989. p. 1-9.
  23. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 7933: ergonomics of the thermal environmentdanalytical determination and interpretation of heat stress using calculation of the predicted heat strain. Geneva (Switzerland): ISO; 2004. p. 1-34.
  24. Chen M-L, Chen C-J, Yeh W-Y, Huang J-W, Mao I-F. Heat stress evaluation and worker fatigue in a steel plant. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) 2003;64:352-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428110308984827
  25. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Threshold limit value for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati (OH): ACGIH; 2015. p. 1-272.
  26. Ansari M, Mazloumi A, Abbassinia M, Farhang Dehghan S, Golbabaei F. Heat stress and its impact on the workers' cortisol concentration: a case study in a metal melding industry. JHSW 2014;4:59-68 [in Persian].
  27. Bernard TE, Cross RR. Heat stress management: case study in an aluminum smelter. Int J Ind Ergon 1999;23:609-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00075-9
  28. Kovats RS, Hajat S. Heat stress and public health: a critical review. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:41-55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090843
  29. Dehghan H, Mortazavi SB, Jafari MJ, Maracy MR, Jahangiri M. The evaluation of heat stress through monitoring environmental factors and physiological re- sponses in melting and casting industries workers. Int J Environ Health Eng 2012;1:21-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9183.96144
  30. Hjollund NH, Storgaard L, Ernst E, Bonde JP, Olsen J. Impact of diurnal scrotal temperature on semen quality. Reprod Toxicol 2002;16:215-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6238(02)00025-4
  31. Sheiner EK, Sheiner E, Hammel RD, Potashnik G, Carel R. Effect of occupational exposures on male fertility: literature review. Ind Health 2003;41:55-62. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.41.55
  32. Thonneau P, Ducot B, Bujan L, Mieusset R, Spira A. Effect of male occupational heat exposure on time to pregnancy. Int J Androl 1997;20:274-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2605.1997.d01-303.x
  33. Namiki M, Nakamura M, Okuyama A, Sonoda T, Nishimune Y, Takatsuka D, Matsumoto K. Influence of temperature on the function of Sertoli and Leydig cells of human testes. Fertil Steril 1987;47:475-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59058-X
  34. Garolla A, Torino M, Sartini B, Cosci I, Patassini C, Carraro U, Foresta C. Seminal and molecular evidence that sauna exposure affects human spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod 2013;28:877-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det020
  35. Ashley CD, Luecke CL, Schwartz SS, Islam MZ, Bernard TE. Heat strain at the critical WBGT and the effects of gender, clothing and metabolic rate. Int J Ind Ergon 2008;38:640-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.017
  36. Moran DS, Shitzer A, Pandolf KB. A physiological strain index to evaluate heat stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1998;275:R129-34. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.1.R129
  37. Budd GM. Wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT)dits history and its limita- tions. J Sci Med Sport 2008;11:20-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.07.003
  38. Malchaire J. Occupational heat stress assessment by the predicted heat strain model. Ind Health 2006;44:380-7. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.44.380
  39. Malchaire J, Piette A, Kampmann B, Mehnert P, Gebhardt H, Havenith G, Den Hartog E, Holmer I, Parsons K, Alfano G, Griefahn B. Development and validation of the predicted heat strain model. Ann Occup Hyg 2001;45:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(00)00030-2
  40. Hajizadeh R, Golbabaei F, Dehghan SF, Beheshti MH, Jafari SM, Taheri F. Validating the heat stress indices for using in heavy work activities in hot and dry climates. J Res Health Sci 2016;16:90-5.

피인용 문헌

  1. Evaluation of Occupational Exposure to Heat Stress and Physiological Responses of Workers in the Rolling Industry vol.12, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874944501912010114
  2. Heat stress, a serious threat to reproductive function in animals and humans vol.86, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23123
  3. Semen quality among men attending urology services in the Dschang Health District, west Cameroon: A retrospective study on 379 cases vol.18, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v18i2.6419
  4. Nighttime environmental noise and semen quality: A single fertility center cohort study vol.15, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240689
  5. Effect of Co-exposure to Heat and Psychological Stressors on Sperm DNA and Semen Parameters vol.8, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.11.015
  6. Do lifestyle practices impede male fertility? vol.53, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13595
  7. Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study vol.16, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255985
  8. Risk of Heat‐Related Mortality, Disease, Accident, and Injury Among Korean Workers: A National Representative Study From 2002 to 2015 vol.5, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gh000516