Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Landform Type of Traditional Space with the National Cultural Heritage in the Damage of Gyeongju Earthquake

경주지진피해로 본 국가지정문화재를 보유한 전통공간의 지형적 입지유형 분석

  • Koo, Min-Ah (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Yeung-Nam University)
  • Received : 2018.02.28
  • Accepted : 2018.03.14
  • Published : 2018.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the geographical location information data and the damage trends according to the type of landform for the study of various cultural properties in 44 traditional places with national designated cultural properties damaged by the racing earthquake on September 12, 2016. The landform type was the most enclosed type, and the location type was more frequent in the surrounding area, such as urban and rural areas. The waterside type was located along rivers, rivers, valleys, lakes, and oceans except for the top of the mountain, but this area was found to be vulnerable to earthquakes, It is understood that it should be referred from cultural property management the side. 26 of the total 44 were temples. The elevation and slope increased with increasing of the flat type, the background type, the enclosed type, the mountain type, and the top type. Most often located on 1-20 % slopes, with the slope facing south more often than not. Within the 10 km range from the epicenter, 23% were concentrated, within the range of nearly 65 km, the background type was closest, and was concentrated in the northeast and southwest from the epicenter. In this study, it is meaningful to analyze earthquake damage in various aspects from the viewpoint of traditional space which is a landscaping cultural property and it will be used for planning, designing and managing traditional spaces.

본 연구는 2016년 9월 12일 발생한 경주지진으로 인해 피해를 입은 국가지정문화재를 보유한 전통공간 44곳을 대상으로 다각적인 문화재 연구를 위해 지형적 입지정보 데이터화와 지형별 유형에 따른 피해 경향을 파악해 보고자 하였다. 지형의 유형은 위요형이 가장 많이 추출되었으며, 위치형은 도시와 농촌과 같이 주변이 건물인 지역의 빈도가 더 많았다. 수문형은 산의 정상쪽을 제외하고는 모두 강, 하천, 계곡, 호수, 바다를 끼고 입지하였으나 이 지역은 퇴적층 지역으로 위요형과 함께 지질학적인 면에서도 지진에 취약한 곳으로 밝혀져 지진과 문화재 관리적 측면에서 참고하여야 할 것으로 파악되었다. 전체 44개 중 26곳이 사찰이었으며, 평지형, 배경형, 위요형, 산지형, 정상형으로 갈수록 고도와 경사가 높아졌으며, 1-20% 경사지에 가장 많이 입지하였으며, 사면향은 남쪽을 끼고 있지 않는 경우가 더 많았다. 진원지에서 10km 범위 내에 23%가 집중되어 있었으며, 거의 65km 범위 내에 있었으며, 배경형이 가장 가까웠고, 진원지로부터 북동쪽과 남서쪽에 집중되어 있었다. 본 연구는 지진피해를 조경문화재인 전통공간의 입장에서 다각도로 분석한 의의가 있으며, 앞으로 전통공간 계획과 설계, 관리에 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Koo, W. H., Park, S. Y. and Baek, M. H.(2016). A Study on the Actual Condition Damages to Cutural Assets according to the Occurrence of Earthquake at Home and Abroad. Journal of the Society Cutural Heritage Disaster Prevention. 1(2): 116-123.
  2. Choi, K. S., Gin, S. C., Lee, S. S., Kim, T. K., Kim Y. M., Im, E. J., Lee, S. W., So, H. S. and Kim, H. K.(2007). Today, Reread an Old Landscape. Press Landscape Architeture. pp. 80-93.
  3. Oh, S. J. and Shin, S. H.(2016). Correlation Analysis of Gyeongju Earthquake Waveform and Structural Damage Scale. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction. 32(12): 33-44. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2016.32.12.33
  4. Kim, J. C. and Oh, S. H.(2017). A Study on the Distance-Attenuation Relation of Gyeongju Earthquake and Distance-Attenuation Equation. Journal of Architecture institute of Korea Spring Conference Proceedings. 37(1): 621-622.
  5. Cho, H. S. and Seo, H. J.(2014). A Study on the Assessment and Improvement of the Heritage's Disaster Risk. Journal of Korean Society Hazard Mitig. 14(5): 179-187. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.4.179
  6. Yu, H. R. and Park, C. M.(2016). A Study on the Damaged Architectural Heritage - Cheomseongdae Observatort- in Gyeongju's from an Earthquake. Journal of the Society Cutural Heritage Disaster Prevention. 1(2): 83-89.
  7. Hwang, S. I.(2007). The Geomorphic Characteristics of Bulguksa-region and the Earthquake Resistant Structure of the Bulguksa Temple. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society. 2(1): 315-331.
  8. Hwang, H. H., Kim, D. S. and Park H. C.(2013). Seismic Hazard Assessment of Architectural Heritage: Buyeo Historic City. Journal of Korean Society Hazard Mitig. 13(6): 305-314. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.6.305
  9. Kim, I. R.(2014). Location and Landscapes of Buddhist Temples in Kyeonggi-do. Journal of Association of Korean Photo-Geographers. 24(3): 165-176.
  10. Jung, J. H. and Jeon, B. H.(1999). A Study on Location and Site Layout of Buddhist temples near Namhan-kang river-in Relation with Transportation of Taxation Grain on Vassels in Koryo and Choson Era-. Journal of Architecture institute of Korea. 19(2): 601-606.
  11. Bae S. H.(2007). The Analysis of The Buddhist Temple Site- Case of Chuncheon, Wonju, Samchuk, Sokcho, Yangyang -. Journal of the Korean Association of Grographic Information Studies. 10(2): 139-151.
  12. Kim, Y. K., Hong, K. P. and Lee, S. Y.(1993). A Study on the characteristics of the Pattern showed in the Site Location and the Space Organization of the Shilla's Buddhist temples. Journal of Korea Institute od Traditional Landscape Architecture. 11(1): 1-17.
  13. Korean Traditional Landscape Architecture Association(2009). History of Oriental Landscape Architecture. Seoul: Daega. pp. 202-220.
  14. Lee, Y. K., Lee B. I., Choi, S. H. and Han, S. Y.(2011). Traditional Temple of Korea. Seoul: The Jogye Order. pp. 47-50.