DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Delayed bipedicled nasolabial flap in facial reconstruction

  • Goh, Cindy Siaw-Lin (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital) ;
  • Perrett, Joshua Guy (Department of General Surgery, Waitemata District Health Board) ;
  • Wong, Manzhi (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital) ;
  • Tan, Bien-Keem (Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.05.19
  • Accepted : 2018.01.09
  • Published : 2018.05.22

Abstract

Background The nasolabial flap is ideal for reconstruction of the nasal alar subunit due to its proximity, color and contour match, and well-placed donor scar. When raised as a random-pattern flap, there is a risk of vascular compromise to the tip with increased flap length and aggressive flap thinning. Surgical delay can greatly improve the chances of tip survival, allowing the harvest of longer flaps with greater reach. Methods We describe our technique of lengthening the nasolabial flap through multiple delay procedures. A bipedicled flap was first raised and then transferred as a unipedicled flap with a 6:1 length-to-width ratio. During the delay process, the flap tip was thinned to the subdermal layer. Results In our case series of seven patients, defects as far as the medial canthal area and contralateral ala were reconstructed successfully with no incidence of tip necrosis or flap loss. The resultant flaps were thin enough to be folded over for the reconstruction of alar rim defects. Conclusions We highlight the success of our surgical technique in creating thin and robust nasolabial flaps for the reconstruction of full-thickness defects around the nose.

Keywords

References

  1. Zilinsky I, Alcalay J, Jacobs D, et al. The versatility of the nasolabial flap enhanced by the delay procedure. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:161-4.
  2. Darwish AM. Bipedicled flap in reconstruction of exposed tibia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:160-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.08.054
  3. El-Marakby HH. The versatile naso-labial flaps in facial reconstruction. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2005;17:245-50.
  4. Weathers WM, Wolfswinkel EM, Nguyen H, et al. Expanded uses for the nasolabial flap. Semin Plast Surg 2013;27: 104-9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1351234
  5. Hynes B, Boyd JB. The nasolabial flap: axial or random? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:1389-91. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1988.01860240039019
  6. Ghali S, Butler PE, Tepper OM, et al. Vascular delay revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:1735-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000246384.14593.6e
  7. Durgun M, Ozakpinar HR, Selcuk CT, et al. Repair of full-thickness nasal alar defects using nasolabial perforator flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2015;75:414-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000398
  8. Menick FJ. The two-stage nasolabial flap for subunit reconstruction of the ala. Oper Tech Plas Reconstr Surg 1998;5: 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-0949(98)80031-0

Cited by

  1. Microsurgical reconstruction of posttraumatic large soft tissue defects on face vol.61, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2018.61.12.724