The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제10권3호
  • /
  • Pages.245-251
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method

  • Jeong, Yoo-Geum (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Wan-Sun (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Bok (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.17
  • 심사 : 2018.02.27
  • 발행 : 2018.06.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. To evaluate the accuracy of a model made using the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) milling method and 3D printing method and to confirm its applicability as a work model for dental prosthesis production. MATERIALS AND METHODS. First, a natural tooth model (ANA-4, Frasaco, Germany) was scanned using an oral scanner. The obtained scan data were then used as a CAD reference model (CRM), to produce a total of 10 models each, either using the milling method or the 3D printing method. The 20 models were then scanned using a desktop scanner and the CAD test model was formed. The accuracy of the two groups was compared using dedicated software to calculate the root mean square (RMS) value after superimposing CRM and CAD test model (CTM). RESULTS. The RMS value ($152{\pm}52{\mu}m$) of the model manufactured by the milling method was significantly higher than the RMS value ($52{\pm}9{\mu}m$) of the model produced by the 3D printing method. CONCLUSION. The accuracy of the 3D printing method is superior to that of the milling method, but at present, both methods are limited in their application as a work model for prosthesis manufacture.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Perakis N, Belser UC, Magne P. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:109-17.
  2. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:272-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x
  3. Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009;25: 929-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
  4. Christensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136: 343-6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0175
  5. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
  6. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an over-view of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  7. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11- 28.
  8. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:2-11.
  9. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  10. Yau HT, Yang TJ, Lin YK. Comparison of 3-D printing and 5-axis milling for the production of dental emodels from in- tra-oral scanning. CAD App 2016;13:32-8.
  11. Kasparova M, Grafova L, Dvorak P, Dostalova T, Prochazka A, Eliasova H, Prusa J, Kakawand S. Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models. Biomed Eng Online 2013;12:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-49
  12. Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:755-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.007
  13. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35:903-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.08.008
  14. Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:749-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004
  15. Rhee YK, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Comparison of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques using 3-dimensional superimposition. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7: 460-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.460
  16. Martins LM, Lorenzoni FC, Melo AO, Silva LM, Oliveira JL, Oliveira PC, Bonfante G. Internal fit of two all-ceramic systems and metal-ceramic crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:235- 40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000200019
  17. Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 2011;27:1273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006
  18. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4
  19. Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 2011;27:1273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006
  20. Joo YH, Lee JH. Three dimensional accuracy analysis of dental stone casts fabricated using irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2015;31:316-28. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2015.31.4.316
  21. Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013; 29:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012

피인용 문헌

  1. 치과 진료실에서 3D 프린트의 활용 vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15522/jkaed.2018.27.2.82
  2. Polymer-based composites for dental three-dimensional printing applied to drug release: A proposal of an antimicrobial biomaterial vol.9, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-8568.266229
  3. Three-Dimensional Evaluation on Accuracy of Conventional and Milled Gypsum Models and 3D Printed Photopolymer Models vol.12, pp.21, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213499
  4. Methods for verification of 3D printed anatomic model accuracy using cardiac models as an example vol.5, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-019-0043-1
  5. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base vol.29, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13107
  6. Clinical and laboratory passive fit assessment of implant‐supported zirconia restorations fabricated using conventional and digital workflow vol.22, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12885
  7. Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry vol.13, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081964
  8. Impact of Aging on the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Models: An In Vitro Investigation vol.9, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051436
  9. Incorporating Aminated Nanodiamonds to Improve the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Resin-Based Biomedical Appliances vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10050827
  10. A new dental casting technique for production of void-free dental models vol.54, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200098
  11. Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review vol.9, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103357
  12. Assessment of Compatibility between Various Intraoral Scanners and 3D Printers through an Accuracy Analysis of 3D Printed Models vol.13, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194419
  13. Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation vol.16, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02691-y
  14. Comparison between Additive and Subtractive CAD-CAM Technique to Produce Orthognathic Surgical Splints: A Personalized Approach vol.10, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040273
  15. Evaluation of the Color Stability of 3D-Printed Crown and Bridge Materials against Various Sources of Discoloration: An In Vitro Study vol.13, pp.23, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235359
  16. Evaluation of the 3D Printing Accuracy of a Dental Model According to Its Internal Structure and Cross-Arch Plate Design: An In Vitro Study vol.13, pp.23, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235433
  17. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis vol.65, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpor_2019_579
  18. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications vol.2021, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131
  19. Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies vol.14, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14061550
  20. Improved procedure for Brown’s Class III maxillary reconstruction with composite deep circumflex iliac artery flap using computer-assisted technique vol.26, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2021.1876168
  21. Accuracy of 3D printed polymers intended for models and surgical guides printed with two different 3D printers vol.40, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-039
  22. Precision and trueness of maxillary crowded models produced by 2 vat photopolymerization 3-dimensional printing techniques vol.160, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.033
  23. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies vol.9, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080983
  24. Effect of Different Software Programs on the Accuracy of Dental Scanner Using Three-Dimensional Analysis vol.18, pp.16, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168449
  25. Accuracy Evaluation of Additively and Subtractively Fabricated Palatal Plate Orthodontic Appliances for Newborns and Infants-An In Vitro Study vol.14, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154103
  26. Pilot in-vitro study on insertion/removal performance of hand-cast, milled and 3D printed splints vol.121, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104612
  27. Bone Regeneration of a 3D-Printed Alloplastic and Particulate Xenogenic Graft with rhBMP-2 vol.22, pp.22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212518
  28. The occlusal precision of milled versus printed provisional crowns vol.117, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103924