한국기록관리학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.189-214
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1598-1487(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-7247(eISSN)
한국기록관리학회 (Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

KARMA를 활용한 ISAD(G)와 CIDOC CRM 연계에 관한 탐색적 연구

An Exploratory Study on Linking ISAD(G) and CIDOC CRM Using KARMA

  • 투고 : 2018.04.30
  • 심사 : 2018.05.24
  • 발행 : 2018.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기록물 기술은 기록관리 전문가의 창작과 편집 과정이며, 그 결과로 생산된 기록 레코드는 이용자가 기록을 효과적으로 이용하기 위한 밑거름이 된다. 그리고 기록물 기술을 위해 보급되는 다양한 기술 표준은 기록 레코드의 내용과 구조를 규정하는 중요한 도구에 해당된다. 본 연구에서는 기록물 기술표준의 특징을 데이터 모형의 구조 측면에서 분석하고, 기록물 기술표준인 ISAD(G)와 문화자원 분야의 도메인 온톨로지인 CIDOC CRM을 시범적으로 연계하였다. 연계에 앞서 ISAD(G)를 데이터 구조 측면에서 분석했으며, 분석 결과를 CIDOC CRM에 맵핑하였고, 연계 플랫폼으로는 KARMA를 활용하였다. 그 결과 온톨로지 기반의 맵핑 방식에 대한 이해와 이벤트 기반 CIDOC CRM에 대한 인식 제고 및 CRM 연계온톨로지의 개발, ISAD(G)의 기존 기술요소 값에 대한 재구조화가 필요하다는 판단을 하였다.

Archival description is considered as a creation and curation process, and the results of the descriptive records can be used for archival information service. Therefore, various archival descriptive standards provide essential guidelines for establishing a semantic and synthetic structure of the archival records. In this study, the structural aspects of the archival descriptive standards were analyzed and an experimental mapping between General International Standard Archival Description (ISAD(G)), the archival standard, and CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CIDOC CRM), the domain ontology of cultural heritage field was performed. The data structure of ISAD(G) is examined in advance and mapping was performed using Karma as a platform. It was thus concluded that there is a need to understand the ontology-based mapping method and the event-focused domain ontology. Moreover, developing a CIDOC CRM-compatible archival ontology and restructuring the legacy ISAD(G) are needed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bhaskar, M. (2016). Curation: The power of selection in a world of excess. Piatkus. (Translated by Choi, Youn young. 2016. Yeamoon Archive).
  2. Hyun, Moonsoo (2014). A Study on the Conceptualization of Information Resources for Localities Based on the FRBRoo/CIDOC CRM. Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(4), 265-290.
  3. Hyun, Moonsoo (2015). A Space-Based Approach to Organizing Local Records Using CIDOC CRM: A Case of the Port of Busan. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 15(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2015.15.2.083
  4. National Archives of Korea (2018). Archival Search menu on Website. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from http://www.archives.go.kr/next/search/viewDescClassMain.do
  5. Park, Zi-young & Kim, Tae-soo (2007). Implementation of EAD 2002 for 4.19 collection. Journal of Knowledge Processing and Management, 8(1/2), 17-57.
  6. Park, Ziyoung (2008). A Study on the Application of a CRM-based FRBR Ontology for Cultural Heritage Information: Based on the FRBRoo(object-oriented FRBR). Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 19(2), 45-62.
  7. Park, Ziyoung (2014). Linking and Sharing EAC Authority Records Using RAMP: Focusing on the Records of "Park, Kyung-ni". Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 14(2), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.2.061
  8. Park, Ziyoung (2016). Analyzing the Next-generation Archival Description Standard: "Record in Context" of ICA EGAD. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(1), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.223
  9. Park, Ziyoung (2017a). Transition of Archival Description from ISAD(G) to Record in Context Conceptual Model. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(1), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093
  10. Park, Ziyoung (2017b). Archival Description and Access in Digital Age that Focuses on the Practices of The National Archives. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(4), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.4.087
  11. Park, Ziyoung (2017c). Expanding and Improving FRBR Conceptual Model through FRBRoo. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(4), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.4.201
  12. Bountouri, L. & Gergatsoulis, M. (2011). Mapping Encoded Archival Description to CIDOC CRM. Advances in Water Resources - ADV WATER RESOUR.
  13. Hong B., Hongzhe L., Jiehua Y., & Hongwei X. (2005). An Ontology-Based Semantic Integration for Digital Museums. in Advances in Web-Age Information Management.
  14. Hooland, S. V. & Verborgh, R. (2014). Linked Data for Libraries, Archives, and Museums. ALA.
  15. ICA (1999). General International Standard Archival Description. 2nd edition.
  16. ICA (2004). International Standard Archival Authority Records - Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families. 2nd edition.
  17. ICA (2016). "ICA International Congress 2016."
  18. ICA EAGD. (2016). Record In Contexts: A Conceptual Model For Archival Description. Consultation Draft v.0.1.
  19. ICOM/CIDOC (2017). Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. ver. 6.2.3. Produced by the ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group, Continued by the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. (Editorial Status: In Progress since [12/10/2017]).
  20. Insight Centre for Data Analytics (2018). The Linked Open Data Cloud. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from http://lod-cloud.net
  21. ISO (2014). Information and documentation - A reference ontology for the interchange of cultural heritage information. ISO 21127:2014(E).
  22. Knoblock, C & Szekely, P. (2013). Semantics for Big Data Integration and Analysis. 2013 AAAI Fall Symposium Series.
  23. Knoblock, C. & Szekely, P. (2015). Exploiting Semantics for Big Data Integration. AI Magazine. 36. 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v36i1.2565
  24. Knoblock, C. (2017). Aligning and Integrating Data in Karma. ISWC 2017 Tutorial. Constructing Domain-specific Knowledge Graphs (KGC). Session I: Web Information Extraction, Wrappers and Information Integration using Karma. Vienna, Austria. 2017. 10. 21-25. http://usc-isi-i2.github.io/slides/part-1-2.pdf
  25. Library of Congress (2018). Eancoded Archival Description Official sites. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from https://www.loc.gov/ead/index.html
  26. RAMP Websites (2018). Remixing Archival Metadata Project. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from https://tools.wmflabs.org/ramp/
  27. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from https://www.ica.org/en/international-congress-2016
  28. Stasinopoulou T. et al. (2007a). WP5-Task 5.5 "Ontology Driven Interoperability", technical report of DELOS.
  29. Stasinopoulou T. et al. (2007b). Ontology-Based Metadata Integration in the Cultural Heritage Domain. In: Goh D.HL., Cao T.H., Solvberg I.T., Rasmussen E. (eds) Asian Digital Libraries. Looking Back 10 Years and Forging New Frontiers. ICADL 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4822. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  30. Szekely, P. (2015). Using Karma to map museum data to the CIDOC CRM ontology [video recording]. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3_yiBhAJIc
  31. University of Southern California. (2016). Karma: A Data Integration Tool. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from http://usc-isi-i2.github.io/karma/