DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다수기 원자력발전소 사고 시 소외 방사성물질 농도 계산 방법

A Method to Calculate Off-site Radionuclide Concentration for Multi-unit Nuclear Power Plant Accident

  • 이혜린 (세종대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 이기만 (세종대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 정우식 (세종대학교 원자력공학과)
  • Lee, Hye Rin (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Sejong University) ;
  • Lee, Gee Man (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Sejong University) ;
  • Jung, Woo Sik (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Sejong University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.08
  • 심사 : 2018.11.09
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

Level 3 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) is performed for the risk assessment that calculates radioactive material dispersion to the environment. This risk assessment is performed with a tool of MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS2 or WinMACCS). For the off-site consequence analysis of multi-unit nuclear power plant (NPP) accident, the single location (Center Of Mass, COM) method has been usually adopted with the assumption that all the NPPs in the nuclear site are located at the same COM point. It was well known that this COM calculation can lead to underestimated or overestimated radionuclide concentration. In order to overcome this underestimation or overestimation of radionuclide concentrations in the COM method, Multiple Location (ML) method was developed in this study. The radionuclide concentrations for the individual NPPs are separately calculated, and they are summed at every location in the nuclear site by the post-processing of radionuclide concentrations that is based on two-dimensional Gaussian Plume equations. In order to demonstrate the efficiency of the ML method, radionuclide concentrations were calculated for the six-unit NPP site, radionuclide concentrations of the ML method were compared with those by COM method. This comparison was performed for conditions of constant weather, yearly weather in Korea, and four seasons, and the results were discussed. This new ML method (1) improves accuracy of radionuclide concentrations when multi-unit NPP accident occurs, (2) calculates realistic atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides under various weather conditions, and finally (3) supports off-site emergency plan optimization. It is recommended that this new method be applied to the risk assessment of multi-unit NPP accident. This new method drastically improves the accuracy of radionuclide concentrations at the locations adjacent to or very close to NPPs. This ML method has a great strength over the COM method when people live near nuclear site, since it provides accurate radionuclide concentrations or radiation doses.

키워드

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Radionuclide concentration calculation9).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Radionuclide concentration calculation using ML method.

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Radionuclide concentration calculation at (X, Y).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Calculation of radionuclide concentration.

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Global and local coordinate systems.

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Calculation procedure of radionuclide concentrations for multi-unit NPP accident.

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Site layout

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Yearly weather windrose.

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Seasonal windrose.

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 10. Air concentration of Cs-137 on constant weather (COM method)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0011.png 이미지

Fig. 11. Air concentration of Cs-137 on constant weather (ML method)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0012.png 이미지

Fig. 12. Ground concentration of Cs-137 on constant weather (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0013.png 이미지

Fig. 13. Ground concentration of Cs-137 on constant weather (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0014.png 이미지

Fig. 14. Air concentration of Cs-137 on yearly weather (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0015.png 이미지

Fig. 15. Air concentration of Cs-137 on yearly weather (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0016.png 이미지

Fig. 16. Ground concentration of Cs-137 on yearly weather (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0017.png 이미지

Fig. 17. Ground concentration of Cs-137 on yearly weather (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0018.png 이미지

Fig. 18. Air concentration of Cs-137 in spring (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0019.png 이미지

Fig. 19. Air concentration of Cs-137 in spring (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0020.png 이미지

Fig. 20. Ground concentration of Cs-137 in spring (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0021.png 이미지

Fig. 21. Ground concentration of Cs-137 in spring (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0022.png 이미지

Fig. 22. Air concentration of Cs-137 in summer (COM method)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0023.png 이미지

Fig. 23. Air concentration of Cs-137 in summer (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0024.png 이미지

Fig. 24. Ground concentration of Cs-137 in summer (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0025.png 이미지

Fig. 25. Ground concentration of Cs-137 in summer (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0026.png 이미지

Fig. 26. Air concentration of Cs-137 in autumn (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0027.png 이미지

Fig. 27. Air concentration of Cs-137 in autumn (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0028.png 이미지

Fig. 28. Ground concentration of Cs-137 in autumn (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0029.png 이미지

Fig. 29. Ground concentration of Cs-137 in autumn (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0030.png 이미지

Fig. 30. Air concentration of Cs-137 in winter (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0031.png 이미지

Fig. 31. Air concentration of Cs-137 in winter (ML method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0032.png 이미지

Fig. 32. Ground concentration of Cs-137 in winter (COM method).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_f0033.png 이미지

Fig. 33. Ground concentration of Cs-137 in winter (ML method).

Table 1. Locations and power levels

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Constant weather data

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Maximum values of Cs-137 concentration in whole cases

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_144_t0003.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. H. J. Jeon, "A Risk Impact Assessment according to the Reliability Improvement of the Emergency Power Upply System of a Nuclear Power Plant", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 224-228, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2012.27.5.224
  2. H. J. Jeon, M. G. Chi and S. W. Hwang, "Off-site Consequence Analysis for PWR and PHWR Types of Nuclear Power Plants using MACCS2 Code", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 105-109, 2011. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2011.26.5.105
  3. T. Hakata, "Seismic PSA Method for Multiple Nuclear Power Plants in a Site", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 92, pp. 883-894, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.022
  4. M. Modarres, T. Zhou and M. Massoud, "Advances in Multi-unit Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessment", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 157, pp. 87-100, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.005
  5. S. Schroer and M. Modarres, "An Event Classification Schema for Evaluating Site Risk in a Multi-unit Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessment", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 117, pp. 40-51, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.005
  6. T. D. Duy, D. Vasseur and E. Serdet, "Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Twin-unit Nuclear Sites: Methodological Elements, Reliability Engineering and System Safety", Vol. 145, pp. 250-261, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.014
  7. T. Zhou, M. Modarres and E. L. Droguett, "An Improved Multi-unit Nuclear Plant Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Approach", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 171, pp. 34-47, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.015
  8. D. Chanin, M.L. Young, J. Randall and K. Jamali, Code Manual for MACCS2: Vol. 1, User's Guide, 1997.
  9. K. McFadden, N. E. Bixler, V. D. Cleary, L Eubanks, R. Haaker, Users Guide and Reference Manual WinMACCS Ver. 3, 2007.
  10. U.S. NRC, RASCAL 4.3: Description of Models and Methods, NUREG-1940, pp. 129, 2015.
  11. Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization, "Development of Level 3 PSA methodology", JNES/SAE06-005, 2006.
  12. U. S. DoE, MACCS2 Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis Final Report, DOE-EH-4.2.1.4, pp. 150-160, 2004.