DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고속철도의 예방적 안전관리를 위한 위험도 평가 기준의 이론적 고찰

Theoretical Considerations on the Risk Assessment Criteria for Preventive Safety Management of High-Speed Railway

  • 이병석 (한국교통대학교 교통전문대학원 교통시스템공학과) ;
  • 김현주 (한국교통대학교 교통전문대학원 교통시스템공학과) ;
  • 방명석 (한국교통대학교 교통전문대학원 교통시스템공학과) ;
  • 임광균 (송원대학교 철도경영학과)
  • Lee, Byung Seok (Korea National University of Transportation Graduate School) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Ju (Korea National University of Transportation Graduate School) ;
  • Bang, Myung Seok (Korea National University of Transportation Graduate School) ;
  • Lim, Kwang Kyun (Department of Railroad Management, Songwon University)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.06
  • 심사 : 2018.12.20
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

The Railway Safety Management System is based on risk management and the basic purpose of risk management is safety management activities to prevent railway accidents and operational obstacles in advance. In order to manage risk, an acceptable risk standard must be established. This risk criterion is used to evaluate the railway risk with both frequency and severity. In the case of overseas railway or other industrial sectors, various factors are reflected in the main variables that constitute the occurrence frequency, but this is no the case in the domestic railway sector. In particular, the current risk assessment criteria in the railway sector remain at a level that exploits the incidents that have occurred in the past and the severity of the property damage and it dose not properly reflect complex and diverse environmental and situational changes in railway operations. Therefore, in this study, it is possible to calculate the potential occurrence of future events instead of occurrence frequency as a component of the risk assessment criteria, focusing on the High-Speed Railway. In addition to the property damage to the consequence, we suggest a rational methodology, development direction, and theoretical implications for constructing accurate and reasonable risk criteria including actual damage such as human injury and time loss.

키워드

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Application example of Risk Matrix Criteria method15).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. HSE Individual Risk Targets(England, 2011)16).

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Example of F-N curve.

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Railway risk management standard concept

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Possibility change according to Total train hours change.

Table 1. Terms related to acceptable risk level per industries

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Definition of possible risk frequency

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Various overseas standards of Individual Risk Criteria17)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Various overseas standards of Societal Risk Criteria18)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Railway accident medical cost(2012)19)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Railway accident administrative cost(2012)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Personal injuries cost of domestic railway sector(2012)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Classification of possible incidents applicable to aviation

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Total train hours per year(Suseo High-Speed Railway)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Possibility standards for risk event(Suseo)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Example of human injuries severity standards

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0011.png 이미지

Table 12. Human injuries severity standards

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0012.png 이미지

Table 13. Example of property damage severity standards (Seoul)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0013.png 이미지

Table 14. Human injuries cost standards of the railway(2007)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0014.png 이미지

Table 15. Comparison of railway incidents medical and administrative cost yearly

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0015.png 이미지

Table 16. Human injuries standard cost for railway incidents (2012)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0016.png 이미지

Table 17. Consumer price index

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0017.png 이미지

Table 18. Human injuries cost of railway incidents( 12~ 17)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0018.png 이미지

Table 19. Standards for possible severity of property damage (Suseo)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0019.png 이미지

Table 20. Example of time loss standards

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0020.png 이미지

Table 21. Delayed accidents and operational obstacles(Suseo, 1-year)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0021.png 이미지

Table 22. Numbers of delayed trains per railway incidents (`01~ 15)

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0022.png 이미지

Table 23. Standards of delayed trains numbers

HOJHB0_2018_v33n6_102_t0023.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. K. O. Kwon, "A Study on the Prevention of Human Errors Accident in KNR", MS Thesis, Seoul National Univ. of Technology, Korea, 2003.
  2. G. H. Gang, "A Risk Assessment Method Based on the Accident and Failure History of an Operator for Metropolitan", MS Thesis, Hanyang Univ., Korea, 2018.
  3. I. S. Lee, "A Study on the Advance Plan through Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Railway Safety Management System", MS Thesis, Woosong Univ., Korea, 2017.
  4. J. W. Lee, M. W. Kim and Y. S. Chang, "Analysis of Quantitative Safety Risk Model of Foreign Country for the Application to Korea Railway", McGraw-H- ill Co, 1980.
  5. M. Y, Park, H. J. Park, "Conceptual Study for Risk Assessment of Asset Management of Infra Structure System", Korean Society of Disaster & Security, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 43-47, 2012.
  6. I. T. Oh, J. G. Paeng, S. Y. Jang, "A Study on the Improvement of Domestic Rail Safety Management System through the Analysis of Safety Management Regulations and Results of the Universal Rail Safety Audit", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 11, No.3, pp. 342-348, 2008.
  7. KOSHA, 4M Risk Assessment Technique, 2011.
  8. International Organization for Standardization, "Risk Management-Principles and Guidelines, ISO 31000, 2009.
  9. E. J. Joung, J. W. Lee, J. K. Kim, D. H. Shin and Y. M. Kim, "New Approach for Risk Assessment in the Railway System", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 2002, pp. 481-485, 2002.
  10. J. B. Wang, C. W. Park and J. N. Park, "A Study on the Development of Preliminary Hazard Analysis Model for Railway System", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 2005, pp. 1-6, 2005.
  11. Y. S. Kim, H. Y. Maeng and J. Bae. Wang, "The Study of Risk Acceptance Criteria for Railway System", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 2008, pp. 786-795, 2008.
  12. C. W. Park, M. S. Kim, J. B. Wang, D. B. Choi, "Development of Risk Evaluation Models for Railway Casualty Accidents", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 2008, pp. 1486-1491, 2008.
  13. S. A. Kim, "Development of Risk-based Railway Safety Management System Architecture", Journal of Korea Urban Railway Society, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 35-40, 2013.
  14. H. J. Jung and J. C. Lee, "On Model-Based Hazard Analysis of Railway Systems to Acquire Functional Safety", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, pp. 261-266, 2016.
  15. RSSB, Guidance on the Preparation and use of Company Risk Assessment Profiles for Transport Operators, 2009.
  16. HSE, Tolerability Limits for Risks Entailing Fatalities, Reducing Risks, Protecting People, 2001.
  17. N. J. Duijm, "Acceptance Criteria in Denmark and the EU", Danish Ministry of the Environment, Project 1269, 2009.
  18. P. H. Bottlelberghs, "QRA in Netherlands", Conference on Safety Cases, IBC/DNV, London, 1995.
  19. KOTI, Calculation of Traffic Accident Cost, p. 65, 2013.
  20. S. K. Bae and D. H. Park, "An Evaluation Model for Human Attributes of Industrial Accidents", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 155-163, 2003.
  21. OSHRI, "Analysis of Industrial Accidents in 2007", KOSHA, 2008.