References
- 교육부(2015). 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 8호] 수학과교육과정.(The Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Revisedmathematics curriculum. The Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74.)
- 김정원, 방정숙(2008). 초등학교 3학년 학생들의 함수적 사고 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C , 11(2), 105-119.(Kim, J. W. & Pang, J. S. (2008). An analysis of third graders' functional thinking. Journal of the KoreanSociety of Mathematical Education Series C : Education of Primary School Mathematics, 11(2), 105-119.)
- 김채연, 신재홍(2016). 연속적으로 공변하는 두 양에 대한 추론의 차이가 문제 해결에 미치는 영향. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A, 55(3), 251-279.(Kim, C. Y. & Shin, J. H. (2016). How does the middle school students' covariational reasoning affect their problem solving. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 55(3), 251-279.)
- 박종희, 신재홍, 이수진, 마민영(2017). 그래프 유형에 따른 두 공변 추론 수준이론의 적용 및 비교. 수학교육학연구, 27(1), 23-49.(Park, J. H., Shin, J. H., Lee, S. J., & Ma, M. Y. (2017). Analyzing students' works with quantitative and qualitative graphs using two frameworks of covariational reasoning. Journal of EducationalResearch in Mathematics, 27(1), 23-49.)
- 방정숙, 최인영. (2016). 초등학교 3학년 학생들의 대수적 사고에 대한 실태 분석. 한국수학교육학회지시리즈 C, 19(3), 223-247.(Pang, J. S. & Choi, I. Y. (2016). An analysis of algebraic thinking by third graders. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series C: Education of Primary School Mathematics, 19(3),223-247.)
- 송윤오(2016). Algebra Applet을 활용한 교수실험에서 초등학생들의 공변 추론 수준 분석, 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교.(Song, Y. O. (2016). An analysis of elementary students' covariational reasoning level in teaching experiment using algebra applet. Master's thesis at KNUE.)
- 우정호, 김성준. (2007). 대수의 사고 요소 분석 및 학습-지도 방안의 탐색. 수학교육학연구, 17(4), 453-475.(Woo, J. H. & Kim, S. J. (2007). Analysis of the algebraic thinking factors and search for the direction of itslearning and teaching. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 17(4), 453-475.)
- 우정호(2007). 학교수학의 교육적 기초. 서울: 서울대출판부.(Wu, J. H. (2007). An educational foundation ofschool mathematics. Seoul: SNU.)
- 전형옥, 이경화, 방정숙. (2009). 초등학교 6학년 학생의 양적 추론 사례 연구. 수학교육학연구, 19(1), 81-98.(Jeon, H. O., Lee, K. H., & Pang, J. S. (2009). Case study of the sixth grade students' quantitative reasoning.Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 19(1), 81-98.)
- 최지영, 방정숙. (2012). 초등학교 2, 4, 6학년 학생들의 함수적 관계 이해 실태 조사. 학교 수학, 14(3), 275-296.(Choi, J, Y. & Pang, J. S. (2012). An analysis of elementary school students' understanding of functionalrelationships. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 14(3), 275-296.)
- Blanton, M. & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional thinking as a route into algebra in the elementary grade. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization (pp. 5-23). Berlin. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., Dougherty, B., & Zbiek, R. M. (2011). Developing essential understanding of algebraic thinking for teaching mathematics in grades 3-5. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A.M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. S. (2015). The development of children's algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39-87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
- Brizuela, B. M., Blanton, M., Sawrey, K., Newman-Owens, A., & Gardiner, M. A. (2015). Children's use of variables and variable notation to represent their algebraic ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(1), 34-63. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981939
- Carlson, M. P. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In J. J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, 3, CBMS issues in mathematics education (Vol. 7, pp. 114-162). Washington DC: Mathematical Association of America.
- Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352-379. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
- Carraher, D. W. & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669-705). Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age.
- Castillo-Garsow, C. C. (2012). Continuous quantitative reasoning. In R. Mwyes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield, & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol. 2, pp. 55-73). Laramie: University of Wyoming.
- Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics and teaching: Dynamics of the high school algebra classroom. NY: Teachers College Press.
- Cooney, T, P., Beckmann, S., Gwendolyn, M., & Lloyd, G. M. (2010). Developing essential understanding of functions for teaching mathematics in grades 9-12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Confrey, J. & Smith, E. (1994). Exponential functions, rate of change, and the multiplicative unit. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 135-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273661
- Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 235-272). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Saldanha, L. & Thompson, P. W. (1998). Re-thinking co-variation from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous continuous variation. In S. B. Berenson & W. N. Coulombe (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the psychology of mathematics education-north america (Vol. 1, pp. 298-304). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. Retrieved on November 1, 2017 from http://bit.1y/1b4sjQE
- Smith, J. & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95-132). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Thompson, P. W. (2011). Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling. In L. L. Hatfield, S. Cahmberlain, & S. Belbase (Eds.), New perspectives and directions for collaborative research in mathematics education, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol. 1, pp. 33-57). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
- Thompson, P. W. (2016). Researching mathematical meanings for teaching. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Third handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 435-461). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
- Thompson, P. W. & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421-456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics