Education of Primary School Mathematics (한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Elementary School Students' Perception of Mathematics Classroom Quality

수학 수업의 질에 대한 초등학교 학생들의 인식

  • Received : 2018.04.16
  • Accepted : 2018.04.25
  • Published : 2018.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of teacher's mathematical belief and student's mathematical performance, sex on the perception of mathematics classroom quality. And this study also detailed the relation between self-directed learning attitude and perception of mathematics classroom quality. For this purpose, this study used 'Students Perception of Mathematics Classroom Quality(SPOCQ)' as an instrument. This instrument focuses on appeal, challenge, choice, meaningfulness, self-efficacy. The 430 5th and 6th grade elementary school students were included in sample. The results obtained in this research are as follows; First, there was a significant difference in the perception of mathematics classroom quality between positive mathematical belief teacher's group and negative mathematical belief teacher's group. So, teacher's mathematical belief influence on the students' perception of mathematics classroom quality. Second, there was a significant difference according to the student's mathematical performance and sex. The students of high mathematical performance usually had positive perception of mathematics classroom quality and the male students also had higher mean than female students. Third, there was positive correlation between self-directed learning attitude and perception of mathematics classroom quality.

수업의 질에 대한 학생의 인식 검사(SPOCQ)'의 구인들은 학습의 동기부여 및 학업성취도와 직접적으로 관련이 있으며, 수업에 대한 학생들의 인식을 평가하고, 수업의 질을 평가하는데 중요한 도구로 작용할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 이 검사 도구를 활용하여 교사의 수학적 신념과 학생의 수학수업에 대한 인식의 관계를 밝히고, 수학성취 수준 및 성별에 따른 수학수업에 대한 인식을 비교함으로써, 수학수업에 대한 학생들의 인식과 학업성취도 사이의 관계를 분석하며, 이를 바탕으로 수학수업에 대한 시시점을 제시하고자 한다. 연구결과, 교사의 수학적 신념과 학생의 자기 주도적 학습태도가 수학수업의 질에 대한 학생들의 인식에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났으며, 학생들의 수학성취수준과 성별에 따라 수학수업의 질에 대한 학생들의 인식에 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권성룡 (2017). 수학수업에 대한 초등교사의 인식 조사. 초등수학교육, 20(4), 253-266. (Kwon, S. Y. (2017). A survey of elementary school teacher's perceptions of mathematics instruction. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 20(4), 253-266.)
  2. 김명희 (2010). Blended-Learning이 자기 주도적 학습능력과 수학적 태도에 미치는 영향. 대구교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문. (Kim, M. H. (2010). The Effects of Blended-Learning on Self-Directed Learning Ability and Mathematical Attitude. Daegu National University of Education Graduate School of Education Master's Thesis.)
  3. 김용성 (2000). 문제상황을 기초로 한 수학화 경험이 수학적 신념과 문제해결력에 미치는 효과. 석사학위논문. 한국교원대학교. (Kim, Y. S. (2000). Effects of mathematising Experiences based on Problem Situations on Mathematical Beliefs and Problem Solving Ability. Korea National University of Education Graduate School Master's Thesis)
  4. 박경미․김동원 (2011). 우리나라 수학교육의 문제점 진단을 위한 조사 연구. 수학교육, 50(1), 89-102. (Park, K. M., Kim D. W. (2011). A survey research to diagnose the problem of mathematics education in Korea. The Mathematical Education, 50(1), 89-102.)
  5. 박경미 외 31명 (2015). 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정 시안 개발 연구. 한국과학 창의재단 연구보고서. (Park Kyung Mi et al. (2015). 2015 revised mathematics curriculum development study. Korea Foundation for The advancement of Science &Creativity Research Report.)
  6. 박성선 (2007). 수학 교실 문화 개선을 위한 교사의 역할. 초등수학교육, 10(2), 151-161. (Park, S. S. (2007). The role of teachers in reform the culture of mathematics classroom. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 10(2), 151-161.)
  7. 교육부 (2015). 초 중학교 교육과정 총론. 교육부 고시 제 2015-80 (Ministry of Education(2015). Introduction to Elementary and Middle School Curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-80.)
  8. 이학식, 임지훈 (2008). SPSS 14.0 매뉴얼. 서울: 범문사. (Lee, H. S., Lim, J. H. (208). SPSS 14.0 manual. Seoul: Bobmunsa.)
  9. 정미영 (2007). 사이버가정학습을 통한 수학과 자기주도적 학습 능력에 관한 연구. 한국교원대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문. (Jung, M. Y. (2007). Study on improvement of self-directed learning ability in mathematics through cyber home study. Graduate School of Education, Korea National University of Education Master's Thesis.)
  10. Abbott, M., Baker, D., Smith Karen., & Trzyna, T. (2010). Winning the math wars: No teacher left behind. University of Washington Press. Seattle, WA.
  11. Artzt, A., Armour-Thomas, E., Curcio, F. (2009). Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher. Routledge. New York.
  12. Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  13. Ball, D.L. (1998). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40-48.
  14. Baudura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  15. Bransford, J. D., Vye, N. Y., Kinzer, C., & Risko, V. J. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge toward an integrated approach. In B. Jones (Ed.), Teaching thinking(pp. 381-413). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  16. Chae, Y., Gentry, M. (2011). Gifted and general high school students’perceptions of learning and motivational constructs in Korea and the United States. High Ability Studies, 22(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2011.577275
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Literacy and intrinsic motivation. Deadalus, 119, 115-140.
  18. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  19. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think (Rev. ed.). New York: Heath.
  20. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C. Ames & R. Ames(Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognition(pp. 13-44). New York: Academic.
  21. Gardner, H. (1991). The unschool mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basicbooks.
  22. Gentry, M., & Owen, S. V. (2004). Secondary student perceptions of classroom quality: Instrumentation and differences between advanced/honors and nonhonors classes. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-464
  23. Gentry, M., Rizza, M. G., & Owen, S. V. (2002). Examining perceptions of challenge and choice in classrooms: The relationship between teachers and their students and comparisons among gifted students and other students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600207
  24. Glassers, W. (1996). Then and now: The theory of choice. Learning, 25, 20-22.
  25. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  26. Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.631
  27. Haladyna, T., & Thomas, G. (1979). The attitudes of elementary school children toward school and subject matters. Journal of Experimental Education, 48, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1979.11011707
  28. Lampert, M. (1988). The teachers' role in reinventing the meaning of mathematical knowing in the classroom. In M.J. Behr, C.B. Lacampagne, & M.M. Wheeler(Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth conference of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education(pp. 433-480). DeKalb, IL: Psychology of Mathematics Education.
  29. Lepper, M. R., & Hodell, M. (1989). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 356-362.
  30. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  31. NCTM (1991). Professional Standards for teaching mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
  32. NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
  33. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology: Vol. 1(pp. 703-732). New York: Wiley.
  34. Pintrich, P., Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom(pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  35. Popham, W. J. (2001). The truth about testing: An educator's call to action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.