참고문헌
- 고은성. 이경화 (2011). 일반학급 학생들과의 비교를 통한 수학영재학급 학생들의 표본 개념 이해 수준 연구. 영재교육연구, 21(2), 287-307. (Ko, E-S & Lee, K. H. (2011). Study on levels of mathematically gifted students' understanding of statistical samples through comparison with non-gifted students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 21(2), 287-307.) https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.2.287
- 고은성 (2012). 통계적 변이성 사고 요소 간의 관계 연구. 학교수학, 14(4), 495-516. (Ko, E-S. (2012). The relationship among components of thinking related to statistical variability. School Mathematics, 14(4), 495-516.)
- 고은성 (2013). 수학영재학급 학생들과 일반학급 학생들의 통계적 변이성 인식 수준 비교 연구. 영재교육연구, 23(3), 287-406. (Ko, E-S. (2013). A comparison of mathematically talented students and non-talented students' level of statistical thinking: The noticing of statistical variability. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(3), 287-406.)
- 김동희. 김민경 (2016). 초등학생의 창의.융합적 사고 및 문제해결력에 관한 연구. 학교수학, 18(3), 541-569. (Kim, D. & Kim, M. K. (2016). A study on creativity integrated thinking and problem solving of elementary school students in ill-structured mathematics problems. School Mathematics, 18(3), 541-569.)
- 김민경. 이지영. 홍지연. 김은경 (2011). 초등학교 수학 교과서에서 나타난 '문제'의 비구조성 (ill-structured)에 관한 연구. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(2), 1-21. (Kim, M. K., Lee, J-Y, Hong, J. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). A study of 'ill-structured' status from mathematics problems in elementary school textbooks. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 1-21.)
- 김민경. 조미경. 박윤미. 허지연 (2012). 초등학교 4학년 학생들의 비구조화된 문제에서 나타난 해결 과정 및 추론 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 51(2), 95-114. (Kim, M. K., Heo, J. Y., Cho, M. K., & Park, Y. M. (2012). An analysis on the 4th graders' ill-structured problem solving and reasoning. J. Korea. Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A: The Mathematical Education, 51(2), 95-114.)
- 김민경. 이지영. 홍지연. 주현정 (2012). 자료분석에 관한 비구조화된 문제해결모형 적용에서 나타난 초등학교 5학년 학생들의 의사결정에 관한 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육논문집>, 26(2), 221-247. (Kim, M. K., Lee, J. Y., Hong, J. Y., & Joo, H. J. (2012). Decision making from the 5th graders' ill-structured problem of data analysis. J. Korea. Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 26(2), 221-247.)
- 김민경. 박은정 (2013). 비구조화된 정도에 따른 비례 문제 유형에서 나타난 초등학생의 비례추론에 관한 연구. 한국학교수학회논문집, 16(4), 719-743. (Kim, M. K. & Park, E. J. (2013). Children's proportional reasoning on problem type of proportion according to ill-structured degree. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 16(4), 719-743.)
- 김민경. 허지연. 박은정 (2014). 초등수학에서의 비구조화된 문제해결 모형 설계, 적용 및 그 교육적 의미. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 18(2), 189-209. (Kim, M. K., Heo, J. Y., & Park E, J. (2014). Design, application and its educational implication of ill-structured problem solving in elementary mathematics education. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 18(2), 189-209.)
- 김영미. 박영희 (2006). 초등학교 5학년 학생의 통계적 변이성 개념의 이해와 그 지도에 관한 연구. 수학교육학연구, 16(3), 221-249. (Kim, Y. M. & Park, Y. H. (2006). Understanding of statistical variation concept of elementary school 5th graders and study on its lesson plans. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 16(3), 221-249.)
- 나미영. 조형미. 권오남 (2017). 미래학교 수학교실 의 교육방법론에 대한 탐색: 비구조화된 문제에서 학생들의 질문 만들기를 중심으로. 한국수학교육학회 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 56(3), 301-318. (Na, M., Cho, H., & Kwon, O. N. (2017). Teaching methodology for future mathematics classroom: Focusing on students' generative question in ill-structured problem. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A: The Mathematical Education, 56(3), 301-318.)
- 박유나. 박만구 (2015). 문제해결에서 생산적 실패의 경험이 초등학생의 수학적 문제해결력 및 수학적 성향에 미치는 영향. 한국수학교육학회 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 18(2), 123-139.(Park, Y., & Park, M. (2015). The influences of experiences of productive failures on mathematical problem solving abilities and mathematical dispositions. J. Korea Soc. Mathe Ed. Ser. C: Education of Primary School Mathematics, 18(2), 123-139.)
- 박태학 (2003). 학교통계교육의 문제점과 개선방향. 교육학연구, 41(2), 401-430. (Park, T. H. (2003). The problems and reform directions of statistics education at school levels. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 401-430.)
- 송선아. 이경화 (2007). 중학교 3학년 학생들의 변이성 이해에 대한 사례 연구. 학교수학, 9(1), 29-44. (Song, S. A., & Lee, K. H. (2007). A case study aimed at junior high school 3rd grade students understanding of variability. School Mathematics, 9(1), 29-44.)
- Ben-Zvi, D. (2004). Reasoning about variability in comparing distributions. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 42-63.
- Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical Situations in Mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Cobb, G. W. & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1997.11990723
- Chi, M. T. H. & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information processing approach (pp. 227-250). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
- Ge, X. & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515
- Hiebert, J. (1992). Reflection and communication: Cognitive considerations in school mathematics reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(05)80004-7
- Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
- Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379-432. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_2
- Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 1042-1629.
- Kapur, M. (2006). Productive failure: A hidden efficacy of seemingly unproductive production. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 28(28), (pp. 1587-1592). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
- Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
- Kapur, M. & Kinzer, C. K. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9059-z
- Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x
- Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40(4), 651-672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9209-6
- Kapur, M. & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591717
- Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38, 1008-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12107
- Ko, E-S. & Lee, K. H. (2010). Are mathematically talented elementary students also talented in statistics?. In B. Sriraman & K. H. Lee (Eds.), The Elements of Creativity and Giftedness in Mathematics. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- NCTM (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S (2006). Designing and Using Mathematical Tasks. St. Albans: Tarquin.
- Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In Steen, L. A (Ed.) On the shoulders of giants: A new approaches to numeracy (pp. 95-137). Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
- Moore, D. S. (1992). Teaching statistics as a respectable subject. In F. S. Gordon & S. P. Gordon (Eds.) Statistics For the Twenty-First Century (pp. 14-25). Washington, D. C.: Mathematical Association of America.
- Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review 65(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1997.tb00390.x
- Pfannkuch, M. & Wild, C. (2004). Towards an understanding of statistical thinking. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 17-46). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Shaughnessy, J. M. (1997). Missed opportunities on the teaching and learning of data and chance. In J. Garfield & J. Truran (Eds.), Research Papers on Stochastics Education (pp. 129-145). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota.
- Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
- Snee, R. D. (1990). Statistical thinking and its contribution to total quality. The American Statistician, 44(2), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684144
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Truxaw, M. P. & DeFranco, T. (2008). Mapping mathematics classroom discourse and its implications for models of teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39(5), 489-525.
- Reading, C. & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2004). Reading About Variation. In: Ben-Zvi, D & Garfield, J (Eds) The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking (pp. 201-226). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Rice, J. A. (2007). Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont: Thompson Brooks/Cole.
- Watson, J. M., Kelly, B. A., Callingham, R. A., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2003). The measurement of school students’ understanding of statistical variation. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739021000018791
- Watson, J. M. (2006). Issues for statistical literacy in the middle school. In A. Rossman, & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Salvador: International Association for Statistical Education and International Statistical Institute.
- Wild, C. J. & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x