DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Actor and Partner Effect of Self Efficacy, Marital Adjustment, and Family Support on Yangsaeng in Infertile Couples

자기효능감, 부부적응도 및 가족 지지가 난임부부의 양생에 미치는 자기효과와 상대방효과

  • Received : 2017.10.18
  • Accepted : 2018.04.13
  • Published : 2018.05.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the actor and partner effects of self efficacy, marital adjustment and family support on Yangseang in infertile couples using the actor-partner interdependence model. Methods: The participants were 108 infertile couples. Data were collected using the Yangsaeng Scale, Infertility Self Efficacy Scale, Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale from March to April in 2016. The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model was used to analyze the actor and partner effects of self-efficacy, marital adjustment and family support on Yangsaeng. Results: The fit indices for the model were Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.99, Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.90, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.01, which met the criteria. We found that only self efficacy had an actor effect on Yangsaeng. Marital adjustment and family support of infertile husbands had an actor effect on the Yangsaeng. In addition, marital adjustment showed an interaction effect. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that the level of Yangseang in infertile couples was positively associated with the levels of self efficacy and martial adjustment. Partner effects may be hidden due to much stronger actor effects on Yangseang.

Keywords

References

  1. Berek JS, Novak E. Berek & Novak's gynecology. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. pp.59-65.
  2. Boivin J, Bunting, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human Reproduction. 2007;22(6):1506-1512. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem046
  3. Kim SK et al. 2012 National survey on fertility, family health & welfare. Seool (KOR): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2012. Report No.: 2012-54.
  4. Moerbeek H, Niehof A, van Ophem J. Changing families and their lifestyles. 1st ed. Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2007. pp. 1-340.
  5. Homan GF, Davies M, Norman R. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Human Reproduction Update. 2007;13(3):209-223. http://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml056
  6. Khosrorad T, Dolatian M, Riazi H, Mahmoodi Z, Alavimajd H, Shahsavari S, et al. Comparison of lifestyle in fertile and infertile couples in Kermanshah during 2013. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2015;13(9):549-556.
  7. Anderson K, Nisenblat V, Norman R. Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment-a review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;50(1):8-20. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01119.x
  8. Yi SJ, Kim AK. Factors influencing Yangsaeng in middle aged women. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2014; 21(1):39-30. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2014.21.1.39
  9. Kim SK, Choi HW, Woo WH. A prediction model on Korean medicine health promotion behavior in the late adulthood-elderly. Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine. 2015;19(2):1-12.
  10. Kim AJ. Development of a tool in measuring Yangseng. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2004;34(5):729-738. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.5.729
  11. Park YS, Lee HY, Kwon Y. Validation of a path model on elderly women’s Yangsaeng (Yangsaeng; traditional oriental health promotion). Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2011; 22(3):325-332. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.3.325
  12. Park YS, Seo DS, Kwon Y. Factors influencing Yangsaeng in elders (Yangsaeng; traditional oriental health promotion). Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2011;41(1):72-79. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.1.72
  13. Kim AK. Yangsaeng and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in middle-aged women. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2010;16(3):297-306. http://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2010.16.3.297
  14. Shin S, Kim JH, Jung D. Traditional Yangsaeng oriental health promotion in patients with cardiovascular disease. International Nursing Review. 2015;62(3):312-320. http://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12187
  15. Greil AL. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine. 1997;45(11):1679-1704. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00102-0
  16. Peterson BD, Newton CR, Rosen KH. Examining congruence between partners' perceived infertility-related stress and its relationship to marital adjustment and depression in infertile couples. Family Process. 2003;42(1):59-70. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00059.x
  17. Chachamovich JLR, Chachamovich, E, Ezer H, Cordova FP, Fleck MMP, Knauth DR, et al. Psychological distress as predictor of quality of life in men experiencing infertility: a cross-sectional survey. Reproductive Health. 2010;7(3):1-9. http://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-3
  18. Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Zachia S, Knauth D, Passos EP. What variables predict generic and health-related quality of life in a sample of Brazilian women experiencing infertility? Human Reproduction. 2007;22(7):1946-1952. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem080
  19. Kim JH, Shin HS. A structural model for quality of life of infertile women. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(3):312-320. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.3.312
  20. Valsangkar S, Bodhare T, Bele S, Sai S. An evaluation of the effect of infertility on marital, sexual satisfaction indices and health-related quality of life in women. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2011;4(2):80-85. http://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.86088
  21. Chachamovich J, Chachamovich E, Fleck MP, Cordova FP, Knauth D, Passos E. Congruence of quality of life among infertile men and women: findings from a couple-based study. Human Reproduction. 2009;24(9):2151-2157. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep177
  22. Gameiro S, Moura-Ramos M, Canavarro M, Santos T, Dattilio F. Congruence of the marital relationship during transition to parenthood: A study with couples who conceived spontaneously or through assisted reproductive technologies. Contemporary Family Therapy. 2011;33(2):91-106. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9153-7
  23. Kenny DA. Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1996;13(2):279-294. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596132007
  24. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin B, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NU: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006. p. 217.
  25. Cousineau TM, Green TC., Corsini EA, Barnard T, Seibring AR, Domar AD. Development and validation of the infertility self-efficacy scale. Fertility and Sterility. 2006;85(6):1684-1696. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.077
  26. Kim JH, Park HJ, Kim JH, Chung S, Hong HJ. Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the infertility self-efficacy scale. Asian Nursing Research. 2017;11(3):159-165. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2017.06.002
  27. Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1976;38(1):15-28. http://doi.org/10.2307/350547
  28. Choi SI. Revision dyadic adjustment scale: reliability and validity [Ko Hwang Thesis]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University; 2004. pp. 97-114.
  29. Cohen S, Hoberman HM. Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1983;13(2):99-125. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb02325.x
  30. Kim JH, Song Y. Health promoting behavior in pregnant couples: actor-partner interdependence model analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2017;47(4):467-475. http://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.4.467