DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

International Comparison of National Elementary Science Curriculum and Science Textbook on Introduction of Particulate Concept

물질의 입자적 관점 도입에 대한 초등과학 교육과정 및 교과서 국제 비교

  • Received : 2018.03.09
  • Accepted : 2018.05.14
  • Published : 2018.05.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the elementary science curriculum and textbooks of Korea, the United States, Japan, and Singapore to know how the contents on particulate concept of matter is introduced and expressed. In Korea, particulate concept of matter was adopted as a term for 'molecules' in the 3rd through 6th curriculum, and the term for 'particles' was adopted in the 2009 revised curriculum. In the United States, NGSS adopted the term 'particle' in fifth grade. Japan presented the concept of 'particle' as a core concept of matter in the commentary, and the expressions 'particles' were being introduced in the textbooks. But it did not cover particulate nature of matter at the elementary school level in Singapore. An analysis of elementary textbooks in Korea, the United States and Japan except Singapore showed particulate expressions in 'dissolution', 'state change of water', 'gas pressure and volume', 'combustion and extinguishment' units. Korean textbook was only being introduced in 'dissolution' and 'gas pressure and volume', but in the textbooks of Japan and the United States, water was expressed as particles in 'state change of water' unit. Discussion and implication on the introduction of particulate concept to elementary science curriculum and textbooks were suggested based on the results.

Keywords

References

  1. AAAS (2006). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved November 15. 2016. from http://www.project2061.org
  2. Adbo, K. & Taber, K. S. (2009). Learners’ mental models of the particle nature of matter: A study of 16-year-old Swedish science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 757-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701799383
  3. Anderson, C. W. & Berkheimer, G. D. (1998). Matter and molecules. Teacher's guide: Science book institute for research on teaching, College of Education, Michigan State University: Occasional Paper, 1988; No 21, 122.
  4. Edens, K. M. & Potter, E. (2003). Using descriptive drawings as conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18230.x
  5. Education World (2007). National Standards: Science. Retrieved on Dec. 4, 2007 from http://www.education-world.com/standards/national/science/index.shtml
  6. Educational Research Institute in Seoul National University (1994). The dictionary for educational terms. Seoul: How.
  7. Glynn, S. (1997). Drawing mental modes. Science Teacher, 64(1), 30-32.
  8. Gobert, J. D. (1997). Expertise in the comprehension of architectural plans: Contribution of representation and domain knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
  9. Herron, J. D. (1996). The chemistry classroom: Formulas for successful teaching. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
  10. Hong, M. & Jeon, K. (2007). Examining the concept of matter in the 7th national science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 51(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.1.065
  11. Jang (2015). The study of 2015 National Curriculum draft development(I). Ministry of Education.
  12. Jung, T. (1989). Textbook system improvement study. Journal of Textbook Study, 2, 22-29.
  13. Kim, D. (2000) A study on the effect on the new teaching strategy facilitating reflective thinking in the learning of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 44(4), 600-610.
  14. Kim, D. (2017). The effects on particulate concept formation based on abductive reasoning model for elementary science class. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.1.0025
  15. Kim, D. & Kim, H. (2012). International comparison of contents about particle concept in national science curricula. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(2), 164-176.
  16. Kim, W. & Kim, Y. (2005). A comparative study on the new middle-school level science curricula of Korea, Japan, Britain, and USA. Journal of Science Education (Busan National University), 32, 11-27.
  17. Korea Textbook Research Foundation (1992). Retrieved December 17, 2016, from http://www.textbook.ac
  18. Kwon, H., Choi, E. & Noh, T. (2004). Students’ understanding of the analogies used in chemistry education and the limitations of using analogies. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(2), 287-296.
  19. Lee, C. & Kwon, C. (2013). Comparison of illustrations of elementary science textbooks in Korea and Singapore. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 6(1), 13-19.
  20. Lee, S. & Kim, Y. (2012). Comparative study on illustrations of the Korean science textbooks of education curriculum rivised in 2007 and the American science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(1), 68-74.
  21. Michael J. B., Michael A, D., Marjorie F. & Gerald H. K. (2009). HSP science 1-6. Harcourt school publishers.
  22. Ministry of Education (1963). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education Announcement 1963-111.
  23. Ministry of Education (1973). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education Announcement 1973-310.
  24. Ministry of Education (1981). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education Announcement 1981-442.
  25. Ministry of Education (1987). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education Announcement 1987-9.
  26. Ministry of Education (1992). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education Announcement 1992-16.
  27. Ministry of Education (1997). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education Announcement 1997-15.
  28. Ministry of Education & Human Resource (2007). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education & Human Resource Announcement 2007-79.
  29. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2009). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education and Science Technology Announcement 2009-361 (supplement 9).
  30. Ministry of Education (2015). Science national curriculum. Ministry of Education Announcement 2015-74 (supplement 9).
  31. Ministry of Education (2018). Teacher's guidebook of elementary school science 5-1. Seoul: Mirae-n Co.
  32. National Curriculum Information Center (1994). Retrieved December 17, 2016, from http://ncic.kice.re.kr/
  33. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  34. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  35. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  36. Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S., Jeong, J., Lee, E., Yu, E., Lee, D., Park, J. & Baek. Y. (2012). Developmental study of science education content standards. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 729-750. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.729
  37. Park, J., Han, S. & Noh, T. (2010). Secondary science teachers’ awareness and perceptions of students’ misconceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 30(1), 42-53.
  38. Park, J. & Kim, S. (2001). Comparison of the instructional influences of dynamic versus static model emphasizing the particulate nature of matter for the learning of molecule on student’s conception in elementary science classes. The Journal of the Institute of Science Education, 22, 39-55.
  39. Park, J. & Paik, S. (2004). The learning effect of teaching materials using computer animation of particulate model in elementary school science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(2), 116-122.
  40. Sung, H. & Noh, S. (2017). The effect of the introduction of the particulate concept in the 2009 revised elementary science curriculum. The Journal of Education, 37(1), 165-182.
  41. Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Education Psychology, 93(1), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.129
  42. Yoon, H., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Paik, S. & Lee, K. (2009). Science curriculum improvement study. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation research report 2009-3-4.