대한영상의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology)

  • 제78권2호
  • /
  • Pages.95-102
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1738-2637(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2928(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

유방암 환자에서 유방 특이 감마영상 검사의 반정량적 분석 및 유방 자기공명영상 검사의 컴퓨터보조진단 분석 결과의 비교 연구

Correlation of Semi-Quantitative Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging Findings with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters Assessed by a Computer-Aided Evaluation Program for Breast Cancer

  • 안새미 (한양대학교 의과대학 영상의학교실) ;
  • 구혜령 (한양대학교 의과대학 영상의학교실) ;
  • 박정선 (한양대학교 의과대학 영상의학교실) ;
  • 문주희 (한양대학교 의과대학 구리병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 최윤영 (한양대학교 의과대학 핵의학교실) ;
  • 정민성 (한양대학교 의과대학 외과학교실)
  • Ahn, Saemee (Department of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Koo, Hye Ryoung (Department of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jeong Seon (Department of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Juhee (Department of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Yun Young (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Min Sung (Department of General Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.12
  • 심사 : 2017.09.29
  • 발행 : 2018.02.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 유방암 환자에 있어서 반정량적 유방 특이 감마영상 검사와 컴퓨터 보조진단 분석을 이용한 유방 자기공명영상 검사의 연관성을 보고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 47명의 침습적 유방암 환자를 대상으로 유방 특이 감마영상 검사에서 병변과 비병변의 비(lesion to nonlesion raio; 이하 L/N ratio)와 역동적 조영증강 자기공명 매개변수의 연관성을 분석하였다. 역동성 조영증강 자기공명영상의 매개변수는 컴퓨터보조진단 분석을 통하여 병변의 크기(cm), 혈관조영 부피(angio-volume, cc), 초기 조영증강 정도(%), 지속적 조영증강 비율(%), 조영증강 감쇄 비율(%)의 항목을 분석하였다. 병변과 비병변의 비(L/N ratio)와 역동적 조영증강 자기공명 매개변수를 대상으로 단변량/다변량 회귀분석을 시행하였다. 결과: 47개의 종양의 유방 특이 감마영상 검사에서 병변/비병변의 비(L/N ratio)의 평균값은 $3.63{\pm}2.19$ (range: 1-13.1)였다. 병변/비병변의 비(L/N ratio)는 종양의 크기가 클수록(p < 0.001), 혈관조영 부피가 클수록(p < 0.001), 초기 조영증강 비율이 높을수록(p = 0.005), 조영증강 감쇄 비율이 높을수록(p = 0.004) 높게 나타났다. 다중회귀분석 결과, 혈관조영 부피(p = 0.007)와 조영증강 감쇄 비율(p = 0.024)이 유방 특이 감마영상 검사에서 병변/비병변의 비와 연관성을 보였다. 결론: 유방암 환자에서 컴퓨터보조진단 분석을 이용한 역동성 자기공명영상의 혈관조영 부피와 조영증강 감쇄 비율은 유방 특이 감마영상 검사에서의 병변/비병변의 비와 연관성을 가진다.

Purpose: To investigate whether a correlation exists between the semi-quantitative breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) findings and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters assessed by a computer-aided evaluation program. Materials and Methods: Semi-quantitative index of the lesion to non-lesion (L/N) ratio in BSGI and DCE-MRI parameters was assessed by a computer-aided evaluation program, where 47 cases of invasive breast cancer were obtained. Correlations between the L/N ratio and DCE-MRI parameters were assessed by a computer-aided evaluation program. Tumor diameter (cm), angio-volume (cc), degree of initial peak enhancement (%), persistent enhancement proportion (%), and washout enhancement proportion (%) were analysed. The relationships between the L/N ratio and DCE-MRI parameters were evaluated by a univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Results: The mean L/N ratio of the 47 tumors was $3.63{\pm}2.19$ (range: 1-13.1). The L/N ratio was higher in tumors with larger diameters (p < 0.001), increased angiovolume (p < 0.001), higher degree of initial peak enhancement (p = 0.005) and increased washout enhancement proportion (p = 0.004). In the multivariate regression analysis, angio-volume (cc) and washout enhancement proportion (%) were associated with L/N ratio (p = 0.007 and p = 0.024, respectively). Conclusion: There was a correlation between the semi-quantitative L/N ratio in BSGI and DCE-MRI parameters assessed by a computer-aided evaluation program for breast cancer.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Hanyang University

참고문헌

  1. Brem RF, Rechtman LR. Nuclear medicine imaging of the breast: a novel, physiologic approach to breast cancer detection and diagnosis. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48:1055-1074 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.008
  2. Yoon HJ, Kim Y, Chang KT, Kim BS. Prognostic value of semi-quantitative tumor uptake on Tc-99m sestamibi breast-specific gamma imaging in invasive ductal breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2015;29:553-560 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-015-0977-3
  3. Yu X, Hu G, Zhang Z, Qiu F, Shao X, Wang X, et al. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women. BMC Cancer 2016;16:450 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2537-1
  4. Specht JM, Mankoff DA. Advances in molecular imaging for breast cancer detection and characterization. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14:206 https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3094
  5. Sun Y, Wei W, Yang HW, Liu JL. Clinical usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality to mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40: 450-463 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2279-5
  6. Tan H, Jiang L, Gu Y, Xiu Y, Han L, Wu P, et al. Visual and semi-quantitative analyses of dual-phase breast-specific gamma imaging with Tc-99m-sestamibi in detecting primary breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2014;28:17-24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0776-7
  7. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-110 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap38101
  8. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13-30 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113
  9. Jena A, Taneja S, Singh A, Negi P, Mehta SB, Sarin R. Role of pharmacokinetic parameters derived with high temporal resolution DCE MRI using simultaneous PET/MRI system in breast cancer: a feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 2017;86: 261-266 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.029
  10. Aghaei F, Tan M, Hollingsworth AB, Qian W, Liu H, Zheng B. Computer-aided breast MR image feature analysis for prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy. Med Phys 2015; 42:6520-6528 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4933198
  11. Dorrius MD, Jansen-van der Weide MC, van Ooijen PM, Pijnappel RM, Oudkerk M. Computer-aided detection in breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1600-1608 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2091-9
  12. Kim BS. Usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality in breast cancer patients with dense breast: a comparative study with MRI. Ann Nucl Med 2012; 26:131-137 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0544-5
  13. Johnson N, Sorenson L, Bennetts L, Winter K, Bryn S, Johnson W, et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging is a cost effective and efficacious imaging modality when compared with MRI. Am J Surg 2014;207:698-701; discussion 701 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.015
  14. Brem RF, Floerke AC, Rapelyea JA, Teal C, Kelly T, Mathur V. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 2008; 247:651-657 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473061678
  15. Tan H, Zhang H, Yang W, Fu Y, Gu Y, Du M, et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging with Tc-99m-sestamibi in the diagnosis of breast cancer and its semiquantitative index correlation with tumor biologic markers, subtypes, and clinicopathologic characteristics. Nucl Med Commun 2016;37:792-799 https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000518
  16. Tadwalkar RV, Rapelyea JA, Torrente J, Rechtman LR, Teal CB, McSwain AP, et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality for the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer with correlation to tumour size and grade. Br J Radiol 2012; 85:e212-e216 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/34392802
  17. Baltzer PA, Vag T, Dietzel M, Beger S, Freiberg C, Gajda M, et al. Computer-aided interpretation of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging reflects histopathology of invasive breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1563-1571 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1722-x
  18. Narisada H, Aoki T, Sasaguri T, Hashimoto H, Konishi T, Morita M, et al. Correlation between numeric gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI ratios and prognostic factors and histologic type of breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:297-306 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0696
  19. Bekis R, Degirmenci B, Aydin A, Ozdogan O, Canda T, Durak H. Correlation between 99mTc-MIBI uptake and angiogenesis in MIBI-positive breast lesions. Nucl Med Biol 2005;32: 465-472 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.04.008